Excell Media Privsate Limited, Hyderabad V. Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(2), Hyderabad

ITA 2009/Hyd/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6270 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-06-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB-A
• Next Hearing Date: 01-05-2019
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 04-12-2017
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DINESH PARUCHURI
• Keywords: Condonation of delay

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMEBR ITA NO. 2009/HYD/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15 EXCELL MEDIA PVT LTD, HYDERABAD PAN AAACE6553D VS. ITO WARD 17(2), HYDERABAD. (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI DINESH PARUCHURI DATE OF HEARING : 01-05-2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12-06-2019 ORDER PER P. MADHAVI DEVI, J.M.: THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR THE A.Y 2014-15 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-5, HYDERABAD DATED 22.09.2017. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE IS AGGRIEVED BY THE DISALLOWANCE OF THE EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTION TO PF AND ESI COLLECTED BY THE ASSESSEE BUT NOT REMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT. THE DISALLOWANCE WAS MADE U/S 36(1)(VA) OF THE ACT. THIS APPEAL IS FILED WITH A DELAY OF SIX DAYS AND AN APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IS FILED ALONG WITH THE AFFIDAVIT. THE CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 17.05.2018 BUT NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE EVEN THOUGH THE VAKALAT WAS ALREADY FILED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE BY MR. P. MURALI KRISHNA ON 01.12.2017. 2 ITA.NO. 2009/HYD/2017 EXCELL MEDIA PVT LTD, HYDERABAD. THEREAFTER, THE APPEAL WAS AGAIN FIXED FOR HEARING ON 01.01.2019 AND NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ONE OF THE COUNSELS MR. A.V. RAGHU RAM WHO WAS PRESENT IN THE COURT UNDERTOOK TO INFORM THE COUNSEL AND AT HIS REQUEST THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 01.05.2019. HOWEVER, ON 01.05.2019 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, PRESUMING THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE THE APPEAL AND RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF B.N. BHATTACHARGEE & ANR., 118 ITR 461 THAT APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN ONLY FILING OF MEMO OF APPEAL BUT ALSO PURSUING IT EFFECTIVELY AND ALSO RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF MUMBAI IN THE CASE OF M/S CHEMIPOL VS. UNION OF INDIA IN EXCISE APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2009, WHEREIN IT WAS HELD THAT WHERE THE ASSESSEE DOES NOT WANT TO PURSUE THE APPEAL, COURTS/TRIBUNALS HAVE INHERENT POWER TO DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT. EVEN ON MERITS, NO DECISION TO REBUT THE FINDINGS OF THE CIT(A) HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR NOTICE. THEREFORE, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 12 TH JUNE, 2019 SD/- SD/- (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) (P. MADHAVI DEVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED: 12 TH JUNE, 2019 KRK 3 ITA.NO. 2009/HYD/2017 EXCELL MEDIA PVT LTD, HYDERABAD. 1) EXCELL MEDIA PVT LTD, 8-2-268/N/28/A, QUINN HOUSE, ROAD NO. 2, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD. 2) ITO, WARD 17(2) HYDERABAD. 3) CIT(A)-5, HYDERABAD. 4) PR.CIT-5, HYDERABAD. 5) THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, I.T.A.T., HYDERABAD. 6) GUARD FILE.