, .. , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , SMC B BENCH, CHENNAI . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.2087/MDS/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12) DR.GOPALAN NARAYANAN, C/O. RAMAN ASSOCIATE, CA, NO.70, R.E. APARTMENTS, 1 ST FLOOR, ARYA GOWDA ROAD, WEST MAMBALAM, CHENNAI 600 033. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2(1), CHENNAI 34. PAN: AIMPN9226B ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SAGADEVAN, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 06.07.2017 !' /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06.07.2017 / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEA LS)-16, CHENNAI DATED 19.05.2016 IN ITA NO.01/CIT(A)-16/AY 2011-12 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 PASSED U/S.250(6) R.W.S .143(3) & 147 OF THE ACT. 2. ON THE EARLIER OCCASION DATED 27.04.2017 THE L D. AR HAD SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT AND THE SAME WAS GRANTED. ON SE VERAL EARLIER OCCASIONS ALSO THE LD.AR HAD SOUGHT ADJOURNMENTS. T HEREAFTER ON 2 ITA NO.2087/MDS/2016 THE SUBSEQUENT DATE OF HEARING ON 06/07/17 NONE APP EARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. MOREOVER THERE WAS NO REQU EST BY THE LD. AR FOR ADJOURNMENT. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, IM OF THE CONSIDERED OP INION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COU RT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), I DISM ISS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. THE REGISTRY IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO DISPA TCH THIS ORDER TO THE ASSESSEE WITHIN A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS FROM THIS DA Y. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 06 TH JULY, 2017. SD/- ( . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER #$ /CHENNAI, %& /DATED 06 TH JULY, 2017 JR & () *) /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. - ( )/CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. )./ 0 /DR 6. /1 /GF