IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES B : HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL CONFERENCE) BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO S . 2095, 2096 & 2097 / H/201 8 A SSESSMENT Y EAR S : 20 04 - 05, 2005 - 06 & 200 7 - 07 KARIM NAWAZ ALLADIN, HYDERABAD. PAN A AACU 3999B VS. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX, CIRCLE 1 4 ( 1 ), HYDERABAD. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: NONE REVENUE BY: SHRI ROHIT MUJUMDAR DATE OF HEARING: 1 6 /0 3 /2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 19/ 0 3 /2021 O R D E R PER BENCH: T H E S E THREE APPEAL S FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR AY S 20 0 4 - 05, 2005 - 06 & 2007 - 08 IS DIRECTED AGAINST CIT(A) - 6 , HYDERABADS SEPARATE ORDER S, ALL DATED 2 1 / 08 /201 8 INVOLVING PROCEEDINGS U/S 143(3) RWS 254 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ; IN SHORT THE ACT. 2. AT THE OUTSET, LD. AR SUBMITTED BEFORE US THAT THE ASSESSEE DESIRE S TO AVAIL VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME. HE FURTHER ITA NO S . 2095 TO 2097 /HYD/ 20 1 8 KARIM NAWAZ ALLADIN, HYD. : - 2 - : SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT FILE FORM NO.1 & 2 DUE TO PAUCITY OF TIME, HOWEVER HE ASSURED THE BENCH THAT THE FORM NO.1&2 SHALL BE FILED SHORTLY. 3. THE LD. DR SUBMITTED THAT IF THE ASSESSEE DESIRE S TO AVAIL THE VIVAD SE VISH WAS SCHEME , 2020 THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. HAVING HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE, WE ARE INCLINED TO TREAT THE INSTANT APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN RELYING ON THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS IN THE CASE OF DCIT VS. M/S. KEYARAM HOTELS P. LTD IN T.C.A. NO. 694 OF 2019, DATED 13/10/2020 WHEREIN IT WAS HELD AS UNDER: - 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (VVS SCHEME FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO.1. . .. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RESTORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, T HE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHOUT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR ITA NO S . 2095 TO 2097 /HYD/ 20 1 8 KARIM NAWAZ ALLADIN, HYD. : - 3 - : RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE TO FILE FORM NO.1 ON OR BEFORE 09/11/2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY HTTP://WWW.JUDIS.NIC.IN5/6 T.C.A.NO.694 OF 2019. ACCORDINGLY, WE HEREBY DISMISS THE INSTANT APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, WE ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT, IF THE ASSESSEE S CASE S ARE NOT ACCEPTED IN THE VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME BY THE REVENUE FOR WHATSOEVER MAY BE REASON ON A SUBSEQUENT DATE, THEN THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION S BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED UNDER THE ACT TO REINSTATE HIS APPEAL S . IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 5. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL S ARE DISMISSED IN ABOVE TERMS. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19 TH MARCH , 2021 . SD/ - SD/ - (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDE RABAD, DATED : 1 9 TH MARCH , 20 2 1 . KV ITA NO S . 2095 TO 2097 /HYD/ 20 1 8 KARIM NAWAZ ALLADIN, HYD. : - 4 - : C OPY TO : 1 KARIM NAWAZ ALLADIN, 8 - 2 - 584, SHANGRILA, ROAD NO. 9, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD . 2 AC IT, CIRCLE 1 4 ( 1 ), IT TOWERS, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD . 3 CIT(A) 6 , HYDERABAD 4 PR. CIT 6 , HYDERABAD. 5 ITAT, DR, HYDERABAD 6 GUARD FILE.