Prabhakaran Mangat, Kerala V. The Pr. CIT-3, Ahmedabad

ITA 215/AHD/2021

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9665 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 9 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-07-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 14-09-2021
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 263; 143(3)

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरणआयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद 瀈यायपीठ अहमदाबाद 瀈यायपीठअहमदाबाद 瀈यायपीठ अहमदाबाद 瀈यायपीठ ‘बी’ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद।अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SMT. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 215/Ahd/2021 Assessment Year : 2015-16 Shri Prabhakaran Mangat, 7E-FG, Vishraam Aanandita Apartment, Mammiyoor, Guruvayur, Chavakkad, Thrissur, Kerala-380101 PAN : AQFPM 6706 J Vs The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-3, Ahmedabad / (Appellant) / (Respondent) Assessee by : Withdrawal Application Revenue by : Shri Alok Kumar, CIT-DR /Date of Hearing : 07/07/2022 /Date of Pronouncement: 07/07/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-3 (“PCIT” in short) dated 31.03.2021 passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short). 2. At the time of hearing fixed in this case on 07.07.2022, it is noticed that the learned Counsel for the assessee has filed a letter dated 6 th July, 2022 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the assessee has already been granted relief, vide an assessment order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 263 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act, on the issue taken by the PCIT under the revisional proceedings. The ITA No. 215/Ahd/2021 Prabhakaran Mangat Vs. PCIT AY : 2015-16 2 assessee, therefore, pleaded that the appeal filed by the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn. The learned Departmental Representative has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. In view of these facts, we allow the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee; and, accordingly appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 7 th July, 2022 at Ahmedabad. Sd/- Sd/- (SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE) (P.M. JAGTAP) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE-PRESIDENT Ahmedabad, Dated 07/07/2022 *Bt /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. ! / The Appellant 2. "# ! / The Respondent. 3. $%$&' # # ( / Concerned CIT 4. # # ( ) (/ The CIT(A)- 5. + , # &' , # # &' /DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad, 6. , ./ 0 /Guard file. / BY ORDER, TRUE COPY ह # $ज (Asstt. Registrar) # # &' ITAT, Ahmedabad 1. Date of dictation- ...covered matter...07.07.2022... 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member ...07.07.2022............ Other member...07.07.2022....... 3. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S. - ...07.07.2022............... 4. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for Pronouncement ...07.07.2022.. 5. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk...07.07.2022................ 6. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk.................................. 7. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order..................... 8. Date of Despatch of the Order..................