VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES B, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 215/JP/2020 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 SHRI PUSH PAL SINGH, 43, CHAND KI TAKSAL, RAJAMAL KA TALAB, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD 5(1), NCRB, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: AIDPS 1884 R VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY: SHRI S.C. JAIN (ADV) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 11/02/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15/02/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-2, JAIPUR DATED 31/12/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2007-08. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: IN THE MATTER OF ABOVE NAMED APPELLANT IN WHOSE CASE AN APPEAL WAS FILED AND WAS PLACED FOR HEARING AND WAS REQUESTED TO BE ADJOURNED FOR THE REASON THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD MOVED APPLICATION FOR SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES AS PER SCHEME NOTIFIED BY THE GOVERNMENT UNDER DTVSV 2020. ITA 215/JP/2020_ PUSH PAL SINGH VS ITO 2 THE APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE AUTHORITY HAS BEEN APPROVED AND THE ASSESSEE ACKNOWLEDGE HAVING RECEIVED THE ORDER IN FORM NO, 3 VIDE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO. 231917220290121 AND ACCORDINGLY THE DISPUTE STANDS SETTLED AS PER SCHEME. THE ASSESSEE IS TO FILE FORM NO. 4 BEFORE THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY FOR FINAL ORDER AND THEREFORE, IT IS PRAYED BEFORE THE BENCH THAT THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE BENCH MAY KINDLY BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN SINCE THE DISPUTE STANDS SETTLED UNDER THE SCHEME. NO ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL SO FILED IS REQUIRED TO BE MADE AND THE SAME BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. (S.C. JAIN) A.R. OF THE ASSESSEE 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH FEBRUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKA D@ DATED:- 15/02/2021 ITA 215/JP/2020_ PUSH PAL SINGH VS ITO 3 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI PUSH PAL SINGH, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 5(1), NCRB, JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 215/JP/2020) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR