SHELAR PROPERTIES PVT LTD., Mumbai V. CIT (A)-21, MUMBAI, Mumbai

ITA 2172/MUM/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1614 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 18 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-11-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 08-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: T S KHALSA SR
• Keywords: Competent authority; Condonation of delay
• Section: 201; 6

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES G , MUMBAI BEFORE S HRI RAJESH KUMAR (AM ) AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI (JM) ITA NO. 2172 /MUM/2019 ASSESSMENT Y EAR: 2014 - 15 SHELAR PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., FIRST FLOOR, PETER PLAZA, J.S. ROAD, DAHISAR (WEST), MUM BAI - 400068 PAN: AAFCS0440N VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 21, AAYKAR BHAVAN, 147/261A, M.K. ROAD, MUMBAI - 400020 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI T.S. KHALSA ( SR. AR ) DATE OF HEARING: 23 /11 /2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 26 / 11 /2020 O R D E R PER RAM LAL NEGI, JM THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.12.2018 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( APPEALS) - 21 (FOR SHORT THE CIT(A) , MUMBAI , FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014 - 15 , WHEREBY THE LD. CIT(A) HAS PARTLY ALLOWED T HE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED U/S 143 (3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (FOR SHORT THE ACT). 2 . THE ONLY ISSUE RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IS THAT THE LD. CIT (A) HAS ERRED IN MAKING ADDITION OF RS. 38,75,80,069/ - TO THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE U/S 35AD OF THE ACT. 3 . THIS CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 23.11.2020. HOWEVER, WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED OU T FOR HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. WE NOTICE THAT THE DIRECTOR OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY HAS SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION DATED 17 .11.2020 STATING THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020, THEREFORE THE APPEAL MAY BE KEPT IN ABEYANCE. 2 ITA NO. 2172 / MUM/20 19 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 201 4 - 1 5 4 . THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT OPPOSE THE ASSESSEES APPLICATION. I N THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) VS . ACIT , TAC NO 372 OF 2020, THE HONBLE MADRAS HIGH COURT HAS DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE ASS ESSEE AS WITHDRAWN IN WHICH THE COUNSEL HAD MADE THE SIMILAR SUBMISSIONS BEFORE THE HONBLE COURT. THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT ARE AS UNDER: - 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (VVS SCHEME FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO. I. 4. IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THIS COURT TO DECIDE THE SUB STANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW FRAMED FOR CONSIDERATION ON ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENACTED THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (ACT 3 OF 2020) TO PROVIDE FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTED TAX AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. THE ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT RECEIVED THE ASSENT OF THE PRESIDENT ON 17 TH MARCH 2020 AND PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ON 17 TH MARCH 2020. 5. IN TERMS OF THE SAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPTION TO PUT AN END TO THE TAX DISPUTES, WHICH MAY BE PENDING AT DIFFERENT LEVELS EITHER BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY OR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL OR BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OR BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. UNDER SECTION 2(J) DISPUTED TAX HAS BEEN DEFINED. IN T ERMS OF SECTION 3, WHERE A DECLARANT MEANS A PERSON, WHO FILES A DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 4 ON OR BEFORE THE LAST DATE FILES A DECLARATION TO THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROV ISIONS OF SECTION 4 IN RESPECT OF TAX ARREARS, THEN, NOTWITHS TANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE INCOME TAX ACT OR ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE DECLARANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 3(A - C) THEREUNDER. 6. THE FIRST PROVISO TO SECTION 3 STATES THAT IN CASE, WHERE AN APPEAL OR WRIT PETITION OR SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IS FILED BY THE INCOME TAX AUTHORITY ON ANY ISSUE BEFORE THE APPELLATE FORUM, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE SHALL BE ONE - HALF OF THE AMOUNT IN THE TABLE STIPULATED IN SECTION 3 CALCULATED ON SUCH ISSUE, IN SUCH A MANN ER AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. THE 3 ITA NO. 2172 / MUM/20 19 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 201 4 - 1 5 SECOND PROVISO DEALS WITH THE CASES, WHERE THE MATTER IS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) OR BEFORE THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL. THE THIRD PROVISO DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ISSUE IS PENDING BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE T RIBUNAL. THE FILING OF THE DECLARATION IS AS PER SECTION 4 OF THE ACT AND THE PARTICULARS TO BE FURNISHED ARE ALSO MENTIONED IN THE SUB SECTIONS OF SECTION 4. SECTION 5 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH THE TIME AND MANNER OF THE PAYMENT AND SECTION 6 DEALS WITH IMMUN ITY FROM INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF OFFENCE AND IMPOSITION OF PENALTY IN CERTAIN CASES. SECTION 9 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ACT 3 OF 2020 WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RESTORE THIS APPE AL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHOUT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN T HE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE TO FILE THE FORM NO.I ON OR BEFORE 20.11.2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SHALL PROCESS THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSI BLE PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIOD OF SIX (6) WEEKS FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE DECLARATION IS FILED IN THE PROPER FORM. 5. SINCE, THE INTENDS TO FILE DECLARATION AND UNDERTAKING IN FORM - 1 AND 2 UNDER DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020, WE RESPECTFULLY FOL LOWING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) VS. ACIT (SUPRA) , DISMISS THE PRESENT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN . HOWEVER, THE APPELLANT/ASSESSEE IS AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF APP EAL AS DISCUSSED BY THE HONBLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE JUDGMENT. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 201 4 - 201 5 IS DISMISSED. 4 ITA NO. 2172 / MUM/20 19 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 201 4 - 1 5 ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 26 TH NOVEMBER , 2020 UNDER RULE 34 (4) OF THE INCOME T AX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, 1963. SD/ - SD/ - ( RAJESH KUMAR ) ( RAM LAL NEGI ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ; D ATED: 26 / 1 1 /2020 ALINDRA, PS / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - 4. / CIT 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD FILE . / BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI