Shri Indrajeet Zandusing Tomar, Surat V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-9(2), Surat

ITA 22/AHD/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0506 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-09-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2016
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 03-01-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, B BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.22/AHD/2014 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2008-2009 INDRAJEET ZANDUSINGH TOMAR R-102, ROHIT AC MARKET RING ROAD SURAT 395 002. VS ITO, WARD-9(2) SURAT. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI JAMES KURIAN, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 23/09/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 23/09/2016 $%/ O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE US AGAINST ORDER OF LD .CIT(A)-V SURAST DATED 15.10.2013 FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2008-09. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE. ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY APPL ICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. THUS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SER IOUS IN PURSUING WITH ITS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE ITAT, D ELHI BENCH IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 23RD SEPTEMBER, 20 16 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER (AMARJIT SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 23 /09/2016