, C IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE S/SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JM, & MANISH BORAD, AM ./ITA.NO.2221/AHD/2011 ( / ASSTT YEAR : 2008-09) DCIT, CIRCLE-8, SURAT VS. M/S SAI DEVELOPERS, 4, DIVYA KRUPA SOCIETY, B/H M.J. COMPLEX, MAGOB, NR. POONA JAKATNAKA, PARVAT PATIA, SURAT. PAN : ABFFS 5134F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY: MR. N.P. PATEL, SR.DR / RESPONDENT BY: NONE (WRITTEN SUBMISSION) / DATE OF HEARING 16/11/2015 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05-01-2016 / O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THE REVENUE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE US AGAINST THE OR DER OF LD.COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-IV, SURAT DATE D 30.052011. PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2008-09. 2. THE GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE LD.CIT( A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION OF RS.25,67,705/- ON ACCOUNT OF DELETION OF ADDITION ITA.NO.2745/AHD/2015 - 2 IN RESPECT OF DISALLOWANCE OF SUPPRESSION AND NON-D ECLARATION OF DISCLOSED INCOME. 3. THIS APPEAL WAS PRESENTED ON 05.9.2011. ON 10.1 2.2015 THE CBDT HAS ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS BEARING NO. 21/2015 PR OHIBITING ITS SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES FROM FILING OF THE APPEAL T O THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) WHERE THE TAX EFFECT BY VIR TUE OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. THE INSTRU CTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE APPLICABLE WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, MEANING THERE BY, THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPLICABLE ON PENDING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRE SENT CASE, THE ASSESSED INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE IS OF RS.2,09,19,530/-. THE ADDITION DELETED BY THE CIT(A) IS RS.25,67,706/-. THE TAX EFFECT ON DE LETION OF THIS TOTAL ADDITION WOULD BE LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. THE PRESE NT APPEAL DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED BEING TREATED TO BE FILED IN VIOLATION OF CBDT INSTRUCTIONS. THE CASE DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIO NS PROVIDED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS. IT IS FURTHER OBSERVED THAT SINCE, W HILE HEARING THE APPEAL, SUCH FACTORS WERE NOT CONSIDERED, THEREFORE, IN CA SE, ON RE-VERIFICATION AT THE END OF THE AO, IT CAME TO THE NOTICE THAT THE T AX EFFECT IS MORE OR IT FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN TH E INSTRUCTION, THEN THE DEPARTMENT WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBU NAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ITA.NO.2745/AHD/2015 - 3 ORDER. SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED WITHIN FOU R YEARS OF THIS ORDER. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 5 TH JANUARY, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER (MANISH BORAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED, 05/01/2016 ! '!/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. $% / THE APPELLANT 2. &$% / THE RESPONDENT. 3. '(( ) * / CONCERNED CIT 4. ) * ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 5. !-. , ,012 /DR,ITAT, RAJKOT 6. .3 45 / GUARD FILE. ) ' / BY ORDER, ' (0 (ASSTT.REGISTRAR) ITAT, AHMEDABAD ITA.NO.2745/AHD/2015 - 4 1. DATE OF DICTATION .. : 5/1/2016 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER : 5/1/2016 3. OTHER MEMBER 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR.P.S./P.S. 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 6/1/16 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER