, , IN THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, CHENNAI . , . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO. 2234 /MDS/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR :20 1 4 - 1 5 LEELADHAR RUNGTA, 24, VENKATESA MAISTRY ST., CHENNAI 600 0 01 . [PAN: A A BHL1610C ] VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , NCR 11(1), C HENNAI - 6 . ( / APP ELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : MRS. S. VIJAYAPRABHA, J CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 04 . 12 .201 7 / DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 05 . 12 .201 7 / O R D E R PER DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 1 3 , C HENNAI DATED 1 8 . 0 7 .201 7 RELEVANT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 1 4 - 1 5 . 2. THE APPEA L OF THE ASSESSEE WAS POSTED FOR HEARING ON 04 . 12 .2017 BY SERVICE OF NOTICE [RPAD ON RECORD]. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE I.T.A. NO . 2234 /M/ 1 7 2 ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION HAS BEEN FILED. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNC ED ON THE 5 TH DECEMBER , 201 7 AT CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 05 . 1 2 .201 7 VM/ - / COPY TO: 1. / APPELLANT , 2. / RESPONDENT , 3. ( ) / CIT(A) , 4. / CIT , 5. / DR & 6. / GF.