M/s. BCI Optical Disc. Ltd., New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 2234/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 118 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2516 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 10 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-03-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 26-04-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SURENDER PAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES F : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.NO.2234/DEL./2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 BCI OPTICAL DISC. LTD., 2, SSI INDUSTRIAL AREA, G.T. KARNAL ROAD, DELHI 033. PAN AAACB0517G VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : - NONE - FOR REVENUE : SHRI SURENDER PAL, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 11.03.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11.03.2019 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-2, NEW DELHI, DATED 12.02.2016, FOR THE A.Y. 2011-2012. 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THE DATE OF HEARING TWICE THROUGH REGISTERED POST. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 2 ITA.NO.2234/DEL./2016 BCI OPTICAL DISC. LTD., DELHI. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE AFORECITED DECISIONS, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS UN-ADMITTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- (R.K. PANDA) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 11 TH MARCH, 2019. VBP/- 3 ITA.NO.2234/DEL./2016 BCI OPTICAL DISC. LTD., DELHI. COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT F BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. // BY ORDER // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.