IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC‘ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2254/Mum/2019 (Asse ssment Year :2010-11) Ms. Hemali P Porwal B-604, Bhoomi Elegant Thakur Complex Kandivli (E) Mumbai – 400 101 Vs. Income Tax Officer 23(2)(2) Matru Mandir Tardeo, Mumbai – 400 007 PAN/GIR No.AN MPP9779Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Gaurav Mehta Revenue by Shri Vachashpati Tripathi Date of Hearing 05/07/2022 Date of Pronouncement 05/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in ITA No.2254/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2010-11 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-48/IT-164/ITO 23(2)(2)/2018-19 dated 12/02/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 19/12/2017 by the ld. Income Tax Officer- 23(2)(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO). ITA No.2254/Mum/2019 Ms. Hemali P Porwal 2 2. We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 27/06/2022 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-5 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter. Ld. DR also agreed that the Form -5 has been received. 3. In view of this, we hereby dismiss the appeal pending before us. 4. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 05/07/2022. Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) Sd/- (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 05/07/2022 KARUNA, sr.ps Copy of the Order forwarded to : BY ORDER, (Sr. Private Secretary / Asst. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A), Mumbai. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard file. //True Copy//