IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH SMC AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.234/AHD/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2004-05 DATE OF HEARING: 19.8.09 DRAFTED:20.8.09 SMT. DOLLYBEN JAYESH SHAH, 110, SANTOK APARTMENT, VARACHHA ROAD, SURAT PAN NO.ABNPS6859D V/S . INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(1), SURAT (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY :- SHRI M.K. PATEL, AR RESPONDENT BY:- SHRI C.K. MISHRA, DR O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-V, SURAT IN APPEAL NO.CAS-V/25 5/2007-08 DATED 24-12-2008. THE ASSESSMENT WAS FRAMED BY THE ITO, WAQRD-9(1), S URAT U/S. 144 OF THE INCOME- TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT ) VIDE HIS ORDER DATED 30-10-2006 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. 2. THE ONLY ISSUE IN THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A) CONFIRMING THE ADDITION OF RS.1.25 LAKHS MADE BY TH E ASSESSING OFFICER ON ACCOUNT OF UNEXPLAINED BANK DEPOSITS. 3. AT THE OUTSET, LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE STAT ED THAT THIS ADDITION IS ARISEN ON ACCOUNT OF SURVEY CONDUCTED BY THE INVESTIGATION WING OF THE DEPARTMENT U/S.133A OF THE ACT ON SHRI PANKAJ DANAWALA, THE TH EN CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT OF THE ASSESSEE ON 11-03-2005. DURING THE COURSE OF SURVE Y ON SHRI PANKAJ DANAWALA, IT WAS FOUND THAT HE HAS CREDITED THE AMOUNTS OF CAPIT AL BUILD UP CASES AND THE MODUS OPERANDI IS FRAUDULENT AND IN THESE CASES FALLS IN TWO CATEGORIES. THE FIRST CATEGORY OF INFLATION OF OPENING CAPITAL SUBSTANTIALLY AND I N THE SECOND CATEGORY HE PREPARED THE PROFIT AND LOSS A/C BY RECEIVING MERELY GIFTS A ND INCOME FROM INTEREST / BROKERAGE ITA NO.234/AHD/2009 A.Y. 2004-05 SMT. DOLLYBEN J SHAH V. ITO, WD-9(1) SURAT PAGE 2 / COMMISSION ETC. FOR MANY YEARS AND THIS CREATED S UBSTANTIALLY CAPITAL IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE ALSO. ACCORDING TO LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, THE ASSESSING OFFICER AFTER DISCUSSING THE VARIOUS STORIES, MADE ADDITION OF CASH DEPOSITED IN THE BANK ACCOUNT AS UNEXPLAINED INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. LD. COUNSEL FAIRLY STATED THAT THE AO HAS MADE THIS ADDITION BY WAY OF EX PARTE ORDER PASSED U/S.144 OF THE ACT AND EVEN BEFORE THE CIT(A) NONE REPRESENTED ON BEHALF O F ASSESSEE AND THE CIT(A) JUST ON THE BASIS OF ASSESSMENT ORDER CONFIRMED THE ADDI TION WITHOUT GIVING ANY INDEPENDENT FINDING. IN VIEW OF THIS, LD COUNSEL R EQUESTED THE BENCH THAT THE MATTER BE SET ASIDE TO THE FILE OF ASSESSING OFFICER TO BE DECIDED AFRESH DE NOVO AFTER PROVIDING REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO THE ASSESSEE, SO THAT HE CAN PLACE THE EVIDENCE BEFORE THE AO IN HIS CASE. ON Q UERY FROM BENCH, LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FAIRLY CONCEDES THAT TH IS ISSUE CAN BE REMITTED BACK TO THE FILE OF ASSESSING OFFICER AS HE AGREED THAT THE RE WAS NO OPPORTUNITY GIVEN TO THE ASSESSEE TO REPRESENT THE CASE BEFORE EITHER OF THE AUTHORITIES BELOW. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WE SET ASIDE THIS ISSUE TO THE FILE OF ASSESSING OFFICER AS INDICATED ABOVE AND THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL IS ALLOWED FOR STA TISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 09/10/2009 SD/- (MAHAVIR SIN GH) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AHMEDABAD, DATED : 09/10/2009 *DKP COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO :- 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(APPEALS)- V, SURAT 4. THE CIT CONCERNS. 5. THE DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, /TRUE COPY/ DEPUTY / ASSTT.REGISTRAR ITAT, AHMEDABAD