IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BR BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.242/VIZAG/2002 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 1997-98 ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR M/S. ITCOS, GUNTUR (APPELLANT) VS. (RESPONDENT) GIR NO.I-301 APPELLANT BY: SHRI G.S.S. GOPINATH, DR RESPONDENT BY: SHRI G.V.N. HARI, CA ORDER PER SHRI S.K. YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.2.2002 PASSED BY THE CIT (A), GUNTUR, AND IT PER TAINS TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1997-98. 2. BOTH THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED THAT THE REVENUE EF FECT IN EACH CASE IS LESS THAN RS.2,00,000/- AND AS SUCH THE SAME ARE LI ABLE TO BE DISMISSED IN VIEW OF JUDGEMENT OF THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF C.I.T. VS A. RAJENDRA PRASAD (299 ITR 227) . IN THE SAID DECISION, HONBLE COURT HAS HELD THAT THE CBDT INSTRUCTIONS FIXING MONETARY LIMITS F OR FILING APPEALS ARE STATUTORY IN NATURE AS THEY WERE ISSUED BY THE CBDT IN EXERCISE OF POWERS UNDER SECTION 119 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT AND THE REV ENUE HAS TO NECESSARILY FOLLOW THEM AND IF A CASE FALLS UNDER ONE OF THE EX CEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULARS, A SPECIFIC GROUND SHOULD BE RAISED IN TH AT REGARD. ADMITTEDLY, THE REVENUE HAS NOT RAISED A SPECIFIC GROUND TO SHOW TH AT THE CASE FALLS WITHIN THE EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULARS OF CBDT. 3. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, BY RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWI NG THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT CITED SUPRA, WE D ISMISS THE APPEAL AS UN- ADMITTED ON THE GROUND THAT IT IS CONTRARY TO THE P OLICY DECISION TAKEN BY THE CBDT. 2 PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 31.12.2009 SD/- SD/- (BR BASKARAN) (SUNIL KUMAR YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER VG/SPS VISAKHAPATNAM, DATED 31 ST DECEMBER, 2009 COPY TO 1 THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR 2 M/S. ITCOS, G.T. ROAD, GUNTUR 3 THE CIT, GUNTUR 4 THE CIT(A), GUNTUR 5 THE DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6 GUARD FILE. BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM