VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH JES'K LH 'KEKZ] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI RAMESH C SHARMA, AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM VK;DJ VIHY LA - @ ITA NO. 248/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. M/S GEMS PARADISE, 45, GULAB NIWAS, M.I. ROAD, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: AACFG 6830 A VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI P.P. MEENA (ADDL.CIT) FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI P.C. PARWAL (CA) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF HEARING: 30/04/2019 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03/05/2019 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: R.C. SHARMA, A.M. THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06/12/2018 OF LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR FOR THE A.Y. 2006-07, WHEREIN THE ONLY ISSUE INVOLVED WHICH IS AGAINST NOT SUSTAINING THE ADDITION @ 25.5% OF TOTAL BOGUS PURCHASES MADE BY THE A.O. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE HAS RAISED AN OBJECTION OF MAINTAINABILITY OF THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE DUE TO THE TAX EFFECT NOT EXCEEDING RS. 20 LACS AS PER THE CBDT CIRCLE NO. 3 OF 2018 DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018. THE LD. A/R SUBMITTED THAT IN THE FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE, TAX EFFECT IN REVENUES APPEAL IS STATED TO BE BELOW THE PRESCRIBED LIMIT OF RS. 20 LACS. 2 ITA NO. 248/JP/2019 ACIT VS M/S GEMS PARADISE 3. THE LD. D/R HAS FAIRLY SUBMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE REVENUES APPEAL IS LESS THAN 20 LACS WHICH IS PRESCRIBED THRESHOLD LIMIT IN TERMS OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018 ISSUED IN SUPERSESSION OF ITS EARLIER CIRCULAR NO. 21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12.2015. 4. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IT IS OBSERVED THAT THE DEMAND/ TAX EFFECT IN THE REVENUES APPEAL IN QUESTION IS BELOW RS. 20.00 LACS. UNDER THE POWERS VESTED BY SECTION. 268A(1) OF THE I T ACT, CBDT HAS RECENTLY ISSUED CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018 (F NO. 279/MISC. 142/2007-ITJ(PT) INSTRUCTING THE AUTHORITIES BELOW THAT DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE FILED BEFORE ITAT WHERE THE DEMAND/TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED RS. 20 LACS. THE CIRCULAR IS SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED TO BE APPLICABLE FOR ALL PENDING APPEALS. 5. SUBJECT TO SOME EXCEPTIONS, IT IS FURTHER DIRECTED BY CBDT THAT ALL THE DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS PENDING BEFORE ITAT WHERE THE DEMAND/TAX EFFECT IS NOT EXCEEDING THAN 20 LACS SHOULD BE EITHER WITHDRAWN OR NOT PRESSED BY THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVES. 6. THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT COVERED BY ANY EXCEPTIONS MENTIONED IN THE SAID CBDT CIRCULAR. SINCE THE TAX DEMAND IN DISPUTE IN THIS DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL IS BELOW THE LIMIT SET OUT BY CBDT FOR THE APPEAL, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018 DATED 11.07.2018. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED/WITHDRAWN. 3 ITA NO. 248/JP/2019 ACIT VS M/S GEMS PARADISE 7. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 03 RD MAY, 2019. SD/- SD/- FOT; IKY JKO JES'K LH 'KEKZ (VIJAY PAL RAO) (RAMESH C SHARMA) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 03 RD MAY, 2019 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- THE A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- M/S GEMS PARADISE, JAIPUR . 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K]T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 248/JP/2019 ) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR