Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9102 (ITAT-DELHI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
7 year(s) 10 month(s) 23 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
22-03-2021
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
D
Next Hearing Date
03-05-2017
Assessment Year
2009-2010
Appeal Filed On
29-04-2013
Judgement Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) SL. NO(S) ITA NO(S) ASSESSM ENT YEAR(S) APPEAL(S) BY APPELLANT VS. RESPONDENT APPELLANT RESPONDENT 1. ITA NO.210/DEL/2013 2007-08 TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD., TCIL BHAWAN, GREATER KAILASH-I, NEW DELHI-48 PAN NO. AAACT 0061 H DCIT CIRCLE 16(1), C. R. BUILDING NEW DELHI 2. ITA NO.419/DEL/2013 2007-08 ACIT CIRCLE 16(1), C.R. BUILDING NEW DELHI TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. 3. ITA NO.3724/DEL/2012 2008-09 TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. DCIT CIRCLE 16(1), NEW DELHI 4. ITA NO.3728/DEL/2012 2008-09 ACIT CIRCLE 16(1) NEW DELHI TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. 5. ITA NO.2492/DEL/2013 2009-20 TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. ACIT CIRCLE 16(1) NEW DELHI 6. ITA NO.3920/DEL/2014 2010-11 --DO-- --DO-- A SSESSEE BY SHRI TARUN SHARMA, ADV. RE VENUE BY MRS. AASHNA PAUL, CIT DATE OF HEARING: 22 / 0 3 /202 1 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 22 / 0 3 /202 1 2 ORDER PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JM : THESE SIX APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE AND REVENUE ARE PREFERRED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-X, NEW DELHI DATED 27.11.2012 PERTAINING TO A.Y. 2007- 08, CIT(A)-XII, NEW DELHI DATED 03.04.2012 PERTAINING TO A.Y. 2008-09, CIT(A)-19, NEW DELHI DATED 07.12.2012 & 13.03.2014 PERTAINING TO A.YS. 2004-05 & 2010-11. 2. BEFORE US, ASSESSEE HAS VIDE EMAIL DATED 20 TH MARCH, 2021 SEEKS WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL AS IT HAS OPTED FOR VIVAD SE VISHWAS (VSV) 2020 AND HAS FILED THE DECLARATION (FORM-1) AND UNDERTAKING (FORM-2) SCHEME AND SEEKING FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. 3. AFTER CONSIDERING THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE, WE DISMISS THE APPEALS OF ASSESSEE AS WELL AS REVENUE AS WITHDRAWN SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESAID ACT, THE PARTIES SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEALS AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. WITH THESE DIRECTIONS, ALL THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE AS WELL AS REVENUE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22.03.2021, IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING OF THE MATTER IN VIRTUAL MODE. SD/- SD/- (K. NARASIMHA CHARY) (ANIL CHATURVEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATE:- 22.03.2021 PY* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI
Mehul