M/s. Shree Sai Communicatio, Moradabad V. ITO, Moradabad

ITA 2599/DEL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 65910 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 5 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-11-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2012
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 31-05-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SATPAL SINGH

Judgement Text

ITA NO.2599/DEL/2010 ASSTT. YEAR: 2006-07 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.N. PAHUJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.NO.2599/DEL/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 SHREE SAI COMMUNICATION, VS INCOME TAX OF FICER, CHAURAHA DURGA COLONY, POST OFFIC E- SAMBHAI, PRO-SAMBHAL, MO RADABAD. DISTT. MORADABAD. (PAN: ABGFS5062F) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SATPAL SINGH, SR.DR O R D E R PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A), BAREILLY DATED 4.1.2 010 FOR AY 2006-07. 2. NONE PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING FOR 14.11.2012 NOR ANY REQUEST F OR ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS DULY SERVED ON THE ASSESS EE THROUGH REGISTERED AD POST. THIS GIVES AN IMPRESSION THAT THE ASSESSE E IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL FILED. WE, THEREFORE, HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO DISMISS THE ITA NO.2599/DEL/2010 ASSTT. YEAR: 2006-07 2 APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE, PLACING RELIANCE ON THE RATIO OF DECISIONS IN THE FOLLOWING CASES:- 1. CIT VS MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 ( DEL); AND 2. LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR VS CWT (1996) 223 ITR 480 (MP) 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL STANDS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14.11.2012. SD/- SD/- (A.N. PAHUJA) (CHANDRAMOHAN GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DT. 14 TH NOVEMBER, 2012 GS COPY FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. C.I.T.(A) 4. C.I.T. 5. DR BY ORDER ASSTT.REGISTRAR