DEEPAK LALWANI, Bhopal V. ACIT-2(1), Bhopal

ITA 261/Ind/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 100 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0132 (ITAT-INDORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-08-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2024
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 28-03-2024
• Result in Favour of: Matter Remanded
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: REVENUE AGREES
• Section: 147; 143(3)

Judgement Text

Page 1 of 3 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, इंदौर Ɋायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 261/Ind/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Deepak Lalwani, 30, Old Ashoka Garden, Raisen Road, Bhopal बनाम/ Vs. ACIT-2(1), Bhopal (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) PAN: ABHPL2405J Assessee by Shri Ashish Goyal, Adv. and Shri N. D. Patwa, Adv. Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 12.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement 13.08.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 26.02.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Pune [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 15.12.2016 passed by learned ACIT-Circle 2(1), Bhopal [“AO”] u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2013-14, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36). Shri Deepak Lalwani, Bhopal ITA No. 261/Ind/2024 - AY 2013-14 Page 2 of 3 2. On hearing learned Representatives of both sides, it emerges that the CIT(A) has decided first-appeal ex-parte qua assessee for the reason that the assessee did not make any submission before him despite opportunities given. It is further observed that the CIT(A) has basically confirmed the order passed by AO and thereby upheld the additions but the grounds/issues raised by assessee in first-appeal requires an apt adjudication by CIT(A) on merit in accordance with the provisions of section 250(6) of the Act which provides “The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) disposing of the appeal shall be in writing and shall state the points for determination, the decision thereon and the reason for the decision.”. Ld. AR for assessee submits that the assessee is ready and willing to make representation before CIT(A) if an opportunity is given and hence prays that the present matter should be remanded to CIT(A) for an apt adjudication. Ld. DR for revenue agrees with the prayer of Ld. AR but makes a request to direct the assessee to represent his case before CIT(A) and do not seek unnecessary adjournments. 3. Considering above submissions and also having regard to the principle of natural justice and fair play, we deem it fit to remand this matter back to the file of CIT for a proper adjudication on merit. The CIT(A) shall give necessary opportunity of hearing to assessee and pass an appropriate order uninfluenced by his earlier order. The assessee is also directed to ensure participation in the hearings as may be fixed by CIT(A) and do not seek unnecessary adjournments failing which the CIT(A) shall be Shri Deepak Lalwani, Bhopal ITA No. 261/Ind/2024 - AY 2013-14 Page 3 of 3 at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. 4. Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in open court on 13.08.2024. Sd/- sd/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Indore िदनांक /Dated : 13.08.2024 CPU/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYAssistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore