The ITO, Wd-2(5), Trivandrum V. Attingal Muncipal Town Service Co- Op Society /Bank Ltd, Trivandrum

ITA 264/COCH/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6528 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-08-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 16-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A S BINDHU
• Keywords: Question of law; Competent authority; Set aside
• Section: 80P

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJAR I, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO. 264 /COCH/201 9 : ASST.YEAR 201 3 - 201 4 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 (5) /RANGE 2 TRIVANDRUM . VS. M/S. ATTINGAL MUNICIPAL TOWN SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.T - 437, BANK BUILDING, ATTINGAL PO, TRIVANDRUM 695 101. PAN : AAAAA7776J . (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SMT.A.S.BINDHU, SR.DR RESPONDENT BY : ---- NONE ---- DATE OF HEARING : 1 8.07.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01.08 .2019 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JM : THIS APPEAL AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) DATED 05.03.2019 . THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR IS 201 3 - 201 4 . 2. THE SOLITARY ISSUE RAISED IN THIS APPEAL IS WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT? 3. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE ASSESSEE IN THIS CASE IS REGISTERED AS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNDER THE KERALA STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. THE ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED IN ASSESSEES CASE BY DENYING DEDUCTION CLAIMED U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR DENYING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT, ITA NO. 264 /COCH /201 9. M/S. ATTINGAL MUNICIPAL TOWN SCB LTD. 2 TREATED THE ASSESSEE AS CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND NOT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. 4. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSMENT, THE ASSESSEE FILED APPEAL BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY. THE CIT(A) BY FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (384 ITR 490) ALLOWED THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. 5. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A), THE DEPARTMENT HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. THE GROUNDS RAISED READ AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT THE APPELLANT IS ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE ACT RELYING ON THE DECISION OF THE ORDER OF HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN THE CASE OF M/S.CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD REP ORTED IN (2016) 239 TAXMAN 417. 2. THE PRESENT APPEAL INVOLVES THE FOLLOWING SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW: (I) THE LD.CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE NOTICED THAT THE RESPONDENT IS ESSENTIALLY, A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND NOT MERELY A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY AND HENCE THE ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P TO THE RESPONDENT ASSESSEE WHILE COMPUTING THE TOTAL INCOME WAS IRREGULAR IN NATURE AND ALSO AGAINST LAW. (II) RECENTLY, THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA HAS OVER RULED THE DECISION OF M/S.CHIRAKKAL S CB THAT THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY WHICH HAD BEEN GRANTED REGISTRATION BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OP SOCIETY IS ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT OF SEC 80P AND THAT THE INCOME TAX AUTHORITY CANNOT GO INTO THE AVAILABILITY OF THE EXEMPTION U/S 80P IS NO MORE GOOD LAW. IT IS ALSO HELD THAT THE DECISION OF THE DIVISION BENCH IN ITA NO. 264 /COCH /201 9. M/S. ATTINGAL MUNICIPAL TOWN SCB LTD. 3 PERINTHALMANNA SCB HAS BEEN DECLARED TO BE THE CORRECT POSITION IN LAW. (III) THE CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE NOTICED THAT THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN THE CASE OF PERINTHALMANNA SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LD REPORTED IN (2014) 363 ITR 68 (KERALA) HAS HELD THAT 'WITH INTRODUCTION OF SECTION 80P(4} NECESSARILY, AN ENQUIRY HAS TO BE CON DUCTED INTO FACTUAL SITUATION WHETHER CO - OPERATIVE BANK IS CONDUCTING BUSINESS AS A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK AND DEPENDING UPON TRANSACTIONS, ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO EXTEND BENEFITS AVAILABLE, AND HE WOULD NOT MERELY LOOK AT THE REG ISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED UNDER THE RELEVANT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT OR AT NOMENCLATURE OF COOPERATIVE BANK', (IV) LD. CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE CONSIDERED THE JUDGEMENT OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD VS ACIT, CIRCIE - 9( 1), HYDERABAD DATED 08.08.2017 REPORTED IN 397 ITR 1(SC), WHEREIN IT HAS BEEN HELD THAT IF A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY IS VIOLATING THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUALITY IN THE GRAB OF PERSONS WHO ACTUALLY ARE NOT REAL MEMBERS AND INDULGING IN BANKING BUSINESS PE R SE THAT IT CANNOT CLAIM THE BENEFIT OF SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I). (V) THE LD. CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING CASE LAWS: (A) 203 ITR 1027 (SC) IN THE CASE OF SABARGANTHA ZILLA KHARID VECHAR SANGH LTD. (B) 234 ITR 201 (KERALA) IN THE CASE O F CIT VS KERALA STATE CO - OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION FOR THESE AND OTHER GROUNDS THAT MAY BE ADVANCED AT THE TIME OF HEARING THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), TRIVANDRUM ON THE ABOVE POINTS MAY BE SET ASIDE AND THAT OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER RESTORED. 6. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE RELIED ON THE GROUNDS RAISED IN THE APPEAL. FURTHER, THE LEARNED DR PLACED ITA NO. 264 /COCH /201 9. M/S. ATTINGAL MUNICIPAL TOWN SCB LTD. 4 RELIANCE ON THE LATEST JUDGMENT OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [ITA NO.97/2016 ORDER DATED 19 TH MARCH, 2019] . NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. 7. WE HAVE HEARD THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (SUPRA) HELD THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CO NDUCT AN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE THE ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. IT WAS HELD BY THE HONBLE HIGH COURT THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS NOT BOUND BY THE REGISTRATION CER TIFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CLASSIFYING THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY AS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT HELD THAT EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS SEPARATE AND ELIGIBILITY SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR EAC H OF THE ASSESSMENT YEARS. THE FINDING OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT READS AS FOLLOWS: - 33. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] IT CANNOT BE CONTENDED THAT, WHILE CONSIDERING THE CLA IM MADE BY AN ASSESSEE SOCIETY FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO EXTEND THE BENEFITS AVAILABLE, MERELY LOOKING AT THE CLASS OF THE SOCIETY AS PER THE CERTIFICATE O F REGISTRATION ISSUED UNDER THE CENTRAL OR STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT AND THE RULES MADE THEREUNDER. ON SUCH A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE A CTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS ITA NO. 264 /COCH /201 9. M/S. ATTINGAL MUNICIPAL TOWN SCB LTD. 5 CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P. 33. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH HELD THAT THE APPELLANT SOCIETIES HAVING BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT, IT HAS NECESSARILY TO BE HELD THAT THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF SUCH SOCIETIES IS TO UNDERTAKE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE LOANS AND ADVANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES, THE RATE OF INTEREST ON SUCH LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BE AT THE RATE TO BE FIXED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KCS ACT AND HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A VILLAGE, PANCHAYAT OR A MUNICIPALI TY AND AS SUCH, THEY ARE ENTITLED FOR THE BENEFIT OF SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT TO EASE THEMSELVES OUT FROM THE COVERAGE OF SECTION 80P AND THAT, THE AUTHORITIES UNDER THE IT ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO ANY ISSUES OR SUCH MATTERS RELATING TO SU CH SOCIETIES AND THAT, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER THE KCS ACT AND CLASSIFIED SO, UNDER THE ACT, INCLUDING THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO SUCH EXEMPTION. 34. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH EXPRESSED A DIV ERGENT OPINION, WITHOUT NOTICING THE LAW LAID DOWN IN ANTONY PATTUKULANGARA [2012 (3) KHC 726] AND PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268]. MOREOVER, THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] IS NOT GOOD LAW, SINCE, IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DO WN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1], ON A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE A CTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE S OCIETY [397 ITR 1] THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268] HAS TO BE AFFIRMED AND WE DO SO. 35. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN ACE MULTI AXES SYSTEMS CASE (SUPRA), SINCE EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS A SEPARATE UNIT, THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE IS IN NO MANNER DEFEATED BY NOT ALLOWING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, IF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY CEASES TO BE THE SPECIFIED CLASS OF SOCIETIES FOR WHICH THE DEDUCTION I S PROVIDED, EVEN IF IT WAS ELIGIBLE IN THE INITIAL YEARS. ITA NO. 264 /COCH /201 9. M/S. ATTINGAL MUNICIPAL TOWN SCB LTD. 6 7.1 IN VIEW OF THE DICTUM LAID DOWN BY THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT, THE ISSUE OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) IS RESTORED TO THE ASSESSING OFFICER. THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL EXAMINE T HE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE ACTIVITIES ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FUNCTIONING UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 AND GRANT DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. IT IS OR DERED ACCORDINGLY. 8. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 01 ST DAY OF AUGUST , 2019 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ( GEORGE GEORGE K. ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIA L MEMBER COCHIN ; DATED : 01 ST AUGUST , 2019 . DEVDAS* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, COCHIN 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM . 4. THE PR.CIT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM . 5. DR, ITAT, COCHIN 6 . GUARD FILE.