IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD SMC BENCH ALLAHABAD BEFORE SHRI P.K. BANSAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 2 77 /ALLD/201 5 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 200 5 - 0 6 DHARAMJEET SINGH , VS. ITO R/O KHANDAWA, TEHSIL SADAR, RANGE - III(1), DISTT. MIRZAPUR. MIRZAPUR. PAN: CCUPS8288J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE . REVENUE BY : SHRI A.K. PANDEY, SR.DR. DATE OF HEARING: 16 . 1 2 .2015 ORDER PRONOUNCED ON: 21 /1 2 /2015 ORDER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30 . 04 .201 4 PASSED BY THE LD. CIT (A) , ALLAHABAD, IN R ELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 200 5 - 0 6 . 2. AT THE THRESHOLD I NOTE D THAT WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. WE FIND THAT PROPER NOTICE OF HEARING HAS ALREADY BEEN SENT TO THE ASSESSEE. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IN MY CONSIDERED OPINION ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE A PPEAL. AS SUCH WE HOLD THAT THIS APPEAL IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. IN THIS REGARD I PLACE RELIANCE UPON THE FOLLOWING CASE LAWS: 1. CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL) ITA NO. 277 /ALLD/201 5 2 2. ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (M. P.) 3. NEW DIWAN OIL MILLS VS. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495 (P& H) 4. CIT VS. B. N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER 118 ITR 461(SC) 3. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE VIEW TAKEN IN THE CASES CITED (SUPRA), I DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21 / 1 2 /2015. SD/ - (P.K. BANSAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 21 / 1 2 /2015 A.K.V. COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR