ITA NO. 281/KOL/2018 A.Y. 2009-2 010 CINDRELLA DEALERS PVT. LIMITED 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA D BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT (KZ) AND SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 281/KOL/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-2010 CINDRELLA DEALERS PVT. LIMITED,.................... ................................APPELLANT 23/1, PRINCIPAL KHUDIRAM BOSE ROAD, KOLKATA-700 006 [PAN: AADCC 4990 M] -VS.- INCOME TAX OFFICER,................................ ........................................RESPONDENT WARD-7(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, P-7, CHOWRINGHEE SQUARE, KOLKATA-700 069 APPEARANCES BY: N O N E, FOR THE APPELLANT SHRI SANKAR HALDER, JCIT, SR. D.R , FOR THE RESPONDENT DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING : JANUARY 07, 2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : JANUARY 07, 2019 O R D E R PER SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT (KZ):- THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-16, KOLKATA DA TED 28.03.2017. 2. IN THIS CASE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE W AS INITIALLY FIXED FOR HEARING ON 10.12.2018. NONE, HOWEVER, APPEARED ON T HE SAID DATE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IN ORDER TO GIVE ONE MORE O PPORTUNITY TO THE ASSESSEE, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 07.01.2019 W ITH THE DIRECTION TO THE REGISTRY TO SEND THE NOTICE OF THE SAID HEARING TO THE ASSESSEE AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN THE APPEAL MEMO. ON 07.01.2019, I. E. TODAY, NONE, HOWEVER, HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. IT APPEARS FROM THIS CONDUCT OF THE ITA NO. 281/KOL/2018 A.Y. 2009-2 010 CINDRELLA DEALERS PVT. LIMITED 2 ASSESSEE THAT IT IS NOT SERIOUSLY INTERESTED IN PRO SECUTING THIS APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 3. THE LAW ASSISTS THOSE WHO ARE VIGILANT AND NOT T HOSE WHO SLEEP OVER THEIR RIGHTS. THIS PRINCIPLE IS EMBODIED IN THE WEL L KNOWN DICTUM - VIGILANTIBUS, NON DORMIENTIBUS, JURA SUBVENIENT. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WAS CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS.- MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADE SH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS.- C.W.T . REPORTED IN 223 ITR 480, WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME FOR NON- PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON JANUARY 07, 2019. SD/- SD/- (A.T. VARKEY) (P.M. JAGTAP) JUDICIAL MEMBER V ICE-PRESIDENT (KZ) KOLKATA, THE 7 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 COPIES TO : (1) CINDRELLA DEALERS PVT. LIMITED, 23/1, PRINCIPAL KHUDIRAM BOSE ROAD, KOLKATA-700 006 (2) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, P-7, CHOWRINGHEE SQUARE, KOLKATA-700 069 (3) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-16, KOLKA TA, (4) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- , (5) THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA LAHA/SR. P.S.