IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: F NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A .NO.-2826/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10) RAMSONS DRUGS LTD. VS. ITO F-125, ADHYAPAK NAGAR, WARD-15(2) NANGLOI, NEW DELHI-110041 NEW DELHI. PAN: AAACR5650E (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY:-NONE REVENUE BY:-MS. ANURADHA MISRA, CIT. DR ORDER PER R. P. TOLANI, JM. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.02.2013 PASSED BY THE LD. CIT (A) XVIII, NEW DE LHI IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. IT IS A RECALLED MATTER I NASMUCH AS THE EARLIER ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL WAS SUBSEQUENTLY RECAL LED. 2. AT THE THRESHOLD WE NOTE THAT WHEN THIS APPEAL W AS CALLED FOR, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. WE FIND THAT PR OPER NOTICE OF HEARING HAS ALREADY BEEN GIVEN TO THE ASSESSEE. UNDER THESE CIR CUMSTANCES, IN OUR 2 CONSIDERED OPINION ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PR OSECUTING THE APPEAL. AS SUCH WE HOLD THAT THIS APPEAL IS LIABLE TO BE DISMI SSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. IN THIS REGARD WE PLACE RELIANCE UPON FOLLOWING CASE L AWS: 1. CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL) 2. ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) 3. NEW DIWAN OIL MILLS VS. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495 ( P& H) 4. CIT VS. B. N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER 118 ITR 461(SC) 3. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE VIEW TAKEN IN THE CAS ES CITED (SUPRA), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON P ROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 7/11/2013. SD/- SD/- ( SHAMIM YAHYA ) (R. P. TOLANI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 7/11/2013 *AK VERMA* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTR