INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.C.SUDHIR , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I TA NO . 2862/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009 - 10 ) DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), ROOM NO.312, C.R. BUILDING, NEW DELHI VS. INFRASTRUCTURE PROFESSIONAL ENTERPRISE LTD, C - 2, GREEN PARK EXTENSION, NEW DELHI PAN:AAACI5794A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SH. T. VASANTHA, SR. DR REVENUE BY: SH. SUBODH GUPTA, CA DATE OF HEARING 27/04/ 2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 16 / 06 /2016 O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI , A . M . 1 . TH IS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD CIT(A) - XV, NEW DELHI DATED 25.03.2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1009 - 10. 2 . AT THE OUTSET OF THE HEARING ITSELF, THE LD. DR BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 DATED 10TH DECEMBER, 2015 HAS DECIDED THAT THE REVENUE WOULD NOT PREFER AN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IF THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. T HEREFORE, HE PLEADED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE BE DECIDED AS PER THE INSTRUCTION OF THE CBDT. LD AR ALSO REITERATED SAME FACTS. 3 . WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE SIDES ON THE ISSUE AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL. WE FIND THAT THE CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR DATED 10.12.2015 HAS REVISED THE MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING THE APPEAL BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, HONBLE HIGH COURTS AND HONBLE SUPREME COURT. THE RELEVANT PARA OF THE AFORESAID CIRCULAR IS REPRODUCED AS UNDER : - 3. HENCEFORTH, APPEALS/SLPS SHALL NOT BE FILED IN CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY LIMITS GIVEN HEREUNDER: - SL.NO. APPEALS IN INCOME - TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT(IN RS.) 1. BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 10,00,000 2. BEFORE HIGH COURT 20,00,000 3. BEFO RE SUPREME COURT 25,00,000 IT IS CLARIFIED THAT AN APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE FILED MERELY BECAUSE THE TAX EFFECT IN A CASE EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMITS PRESCRIBED ABOVE. FILING OF APPEAL IN SUCH CASES IS TO BE DECIDED ON MERITS OF THE CASE. PAGE 2 OF 2 4 . WE FIND THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVES IN THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS BELOW RS.10 LAKHS. THERE IS NO DISPUTE THAT THE BOARDS INSTRUCTIONS OR DIRECTIONS ISSUED TO THE INCOME - TAX AUTHORITIES ARE BINDING ON THOSE AUTHORITIES, THEREFORE, THE DEPARTMENT SHOULD HAVE WITHDRAWN/N OT PRESSED THE PRESENT APPEAL IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID INSTRUCTION SINCE THE TAX EFFECT IN THE INSTANT APPEAL IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT OF RS.10 LAKHS. 5. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, CIRCULAR NO.21 DATED 10.12.2015 W ILL APPLY TO ALL PENDING APPEAL . THEREFORE THE P RECEDENT, IT IS HELD THAT THE APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN THE INSTANT CASE AS THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HELD THAT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE DEPART MENT IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 1 6 / 06 /2016 . - S D / - - S D / - ( I.C.SUDHIR ) (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 1 6 / 06 / 2016 A K KEOT COPY FORWARDED TO 1 . APPLICANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT 4 . CIT (A) 5 . DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI