INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.:- 2865/DEL/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 O R D E R T HE AFORESAID APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(APPEALS)7, NEW DELHI VIDE ORDER DATED 21.02.2018 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 13.11.2018 BUT ON THE FIXED DATE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, THEREFORE, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 29.1.2019 AND BOTH PARTIES WERE INFORMED. TODAY ON 29.1.2019, NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS PLACED BEFORE THE BENCH. RATNASHRI COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. 10, SAGAR APARTMENTS, 6, TILAK MARG, NEW DELHI -110 001 VS. IT O, WARD - 21 (1), NEW DELHI PAN AAACR7138K (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI S.L. ANURAGI, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 29/01 /201 9 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 29/ 01/2019 2 3. IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE PROSECUTION OF APPEAL. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), I DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 4. IN THE RESULT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29 TH JANUARY, 2019. SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 29/01/2019 VEENA COPY FORWARDED TO 1. APPLICANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI