Ved Parkash, Ludhiana V. DCIT, Ludhiana

ITA 289/CHANDI/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1332 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 4 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-07-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 10-02-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SANDEEP DAHIYA

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH B, CHANDIGARH , ! ' , $ % & ' ( , ' BEFORE: SMT.DIVA SINGH, JUDICAL MEMBER AND SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NOS.117 & 118/CHD/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2004-05 & 2005-06 & ./ ITA NOS.289 & 290/CHD/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2006-07 & 2007-08 VED PARKASH S/O SHRI DEWAN CHAND, 788-I BRS NAGAR, LUDHIANA. THE D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE II, LUDHIANA. ./PAN NO: AAIAPP7775R /APPELLANT /RESPONDENT /ASSESSEE BY : SHRI DEEPAK AGGARWAL, ADV. ! / REVENUE BY : SHRI SANDEEP DAHIYA, CIT DR ' # $ /DATE OF HEARING : 05.07.2021 %&'( $ /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 06.07. 2021 (VIRTUAL COURT) / ORDER PER BENCH : ALL THE ABOVE APPEALS HAVE BEEN PREFERRED BY THE SA ME ASSESSEE AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF THE COMMISS IONER OF INCOMETAX (APPEALS)-5, LUDHIANA DATED 13.10.2016, 13.10.2016, 28.11.2016 AND 29.11.2016 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 AND 2007 -08 ITA NOS.117,118,289 & 290/CHD/2017 A.YS. 2004-05 TO 2007-08 PAGE 2 OF 3 RESPECTIVELY, PASSED U/S 250(6)) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ACT. 2. LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT SINCE THE ASSESSEES APPLICATION IN ALL THE APPEALS FOR SETTL ING THE DISPUTE UNDER THE 'VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020'(VSV) HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT AND FORM NO.3 HAS BEEN ISSUED EVIDENCING THE SAME, THEREFORE, HE INTE NDS TO WITHDRAW ALL THE PRESENT APPEALS. SEPARATE APPLICAT ION DATED 02.07.2021 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ALL THE APPEALS HAS BE EN SUBMITTED BY THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE. THE LD. DR DID NOT OBJECT TO THE SAME. 3. WE HAVE PERUSED THE RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS BEFOR E US AND FIND THAT THE DISPUTE IN THE ABOVE APPEALS STAND SE TTLED UNDER THE VSV SCHEME, WHICH IS EVIDENCED BY SEPARATE FORM NO.3 ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT IN THIS RESPECT FOR ASSESS MENT YEAR 2004-05 & 2005-06 DATED 20.04.2021 AND FOR ASSESSME NT YEAR 2006-07 & 2007-08 DATED 23.02.2021. IN VIEW OF THE SAME, THE ASSESSEES APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IS A CCEPTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE ABOVE APPEALS OF THE ASSE SSEE ARE HEREBY DISMISSED AS 'WITHDRAWN'. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 06.07.2021. SD/- SD/- (DIVA SINGH) (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) !'/ JUDICIAL MEMBER )*'/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 6 TH JULY, 2021 ITA NOS.117,118,289 & 290/CHD/2017 A.YS. 2004-05 TO 2007-08 PAGE 3 OF 3 * * *+ ,+ / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. ' - / CIT 4. ' - ( )/ THE CIT(A) 5. +./ 0 , $ 0 , 123/4 / DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. /3 / GUARD FILE ' / BY ORDER, / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR