GRK Reddy, CHENNAI V. ACIT, CHENNAI

ITA 2914/CHNY/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 90371 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-05-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 28-05-2015
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 27-11-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DR B NISCHAL

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH : CHENNAI . , ! ' , # $% & [BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER] ./ I.T.A.NO.2914/MDS/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 SHRI GRK READDY RAMAKRISHNA REDDY GORREPATI OLD NO.24, NEW NO.17 SOUTH MADA STREET SRINAGAR COLONY CHENNAI 600 015 VS. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX COMPANY CIRCLE IV(1) CHENNAI [PAN AEHPR 7240 G] ( '( / APPELLANT) ( ')'( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : DR. B. NISCHAL, JCIT / DATE OF HEARING : 28-05-2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28-05-2015 * / O R D E R PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-IV, CHENNA I, DATED 28.3.2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED UPON FOR HEARING, NOBOD Y APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT ITA NO.2914/14 :- 2 -: FILED. FROM THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD OF THE POST OFFICE PLACED ON RECORD, IT IS EVIDENT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS RECEI VED THE NOTICE OF HEARING. IT IS, THEREFORE, INFERRED THAT THE ASSE SSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL WHICH IS HEREBY DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION FOLLOWING THE ORDER OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBU NAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD (1991) 38 ITD 320(DE L.) AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480). 3 . THE ASSESSEE SHALL, HOWEVER, BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER, IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NON-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF H EARING ON 28 TH OF MAY, 2015, AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( ! ' ) (CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD) # / JUDICIAL MEMBER ( . ) (D. KARUNAKARA RAO) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / CHENNAI !' / DATED: 28 TH MAY, 2015 RD '#$%&'& / COPY TO: 1 . / APPELLANT 3. ()* / CIT(A) 5. &+ ,$$-. / DR 2. / RESPONDENT 4. ( / CIT 6. , /01 / GF