JITESH CHHOTELAL DUBEY, MUMBAI V. ITO 20(1)(3), MUMBAI

ITA 293/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: 29319914 RSA 2011
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-01-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: I
• Next Hearing Date: 24-12-2013
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 12-01-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: M L PERUMAL

Judgement Text

, VKBZ VKBZ VKBZ VKBZ INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMB AI - I BENCH MUMBAI . . , / ! ! ! ! , BEFORE S/SH.B.R.MITTAL,JUDICIAL MEMBE R & RAJENDRA,ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /. ITA NO. 293/MUM/2011, ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 JITESH CHHOTELAL DUBEY 502, SHIV DARSHAN, OLD NAGARDAS ROAD, ANDHERI (E) MUMBAI-400069 VS. ITO 20(1)(3) BANDRA, MUMBAI. PAN: ABQPD8814J ( $% / ASSESSEE ) ( &'$% / RESPONDENT) $% $% $% $% ( (( ( ) ) ) ) / ASSESSEE BY : NONE &'$% ( ) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M.L.PERUMAL ' ' ' ' ( (( ( +, +, +, +, / DATE OF HEARING : 24 . 12 .2013 -.# ( +, / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08 . 01 .201 4 ' ' ' ' , 1961 ( (( ( 254 )1( +/ +/ +/ +/+ ++ + 0 0 0 0 ORDER U/S.254(1)OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT,1961(ACT) PER RAJENDRA,A.M: CHALLENGING THE ORDER DATED 01.10.2010 OF THE CIT(A )-31,MUMBAI,ASSESSEE HAD RAISED FOUR GROUNDS OF APPEAL. 2. ASSESSEE, AN INDIVIDUAL, HAD FILED ITS RETURN OF INCOME ON 31.10.2006 DECLARING TOTAL INCOME OF RS. 4.47 LACS. ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) FINALISED THE ASSESSMENT ON 15.12.2008 DETERMINING THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE AT RS. 21.94 LACS. 3. ASSESSEE PREFERRED AN APPEAL BEFORE THE FIRST AP PELLATE AUTHORITY(FAA). BUT, NONE APPEARED BEFORE HIM DURING THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS, THOUGH THE NOTICES WERE SERVED UPON HIM AS PER THE FAA. AS A RESULT, HE DISMISSED THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. 4. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING BEFORE US ASSESSEE WAS NOT PRESENT NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION FILED BY HIM FOR ADJOURNING THE MATTER. IN THESE CIRCUMST ANCES, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE FAA, WE DECIDE GROUND NO. 1 TO 4 AGAINST THE ASSESSEE. AS A RESULT,APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED. 1 2 '1+ 3 4 V 5+ ( + 67. 2 ITA NO. 293/MUM/2011 JITESH CHHOTELAL DUBEY ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 8 TH JANUARY, 2014. 0 ( -.# 9 8 TUOJH] TUOJH] TUOJH] TUOJH] 2014 . ( /. SD/- SD/- ( . . . B.R.MITTAL ) ( ! ! ! ! / RAJENDRA ) / JUDICIAL MEMBER /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / MUMBAI, :' /DATE: 08.01.2014 SK 0 0 0 0 ( (( ( &+; &+; &+; &+; < ;#+ < ;#+ < ;#+ < ;#+ / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. ASSESSEE / $% 2. RESPONDENT / &'$% 3. THE CONCERNED CIT(A)/ = > , 4. THE CONCERNED CIT / = > 5. DR I BENCH, ITAT, MUMBAI / ;?/ &+' VKB VKBVKB VKB Z ZZ Z , . . . 6. GUARD FILE/ / @ . ';+ &+ //TRUE COPY// 0' / BY ORDER, A / 6 DY./ASST. REGISTRAR , /ITAT, MUMBAI.