1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC - 3 , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 29 48 /DEL/201 5 AY: 20 10 - 11 SHIKSHA SAMITI KANINA VS. ACIT C/O CA AJAY KUMAR AIRAN REWARI SHOP NO.443 OLD COURT ROAD SHOPPING COMPLEX, MODEL TOWN REWARI 123 401 PAN: AAAJS 3132 P (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE. RESPONDENT BY : NONE . O R D E R THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) , ROHTAK DATED 10.04.2015 PERTAINING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (A.Y.) 20 10 - 11 . 2. NONE APPEARED ON BOTH THE SIDES. 2.1. THE REVENUE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF ALL THE CASES WHICH ARE ON BOARD TODAY ON THE GROUND THAT SR.D.R. IS NOT A VAILABLE . I AM INFORMED THAT, FOR THE ENTIRE WEEK, THE DEPARTMENT WOULD BE SEEKING ADJOURNMENTS IN ALL THE CASES POSTED BEFORE THIS SMC BENCH ON THE SAME GROUND. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, AS THE BENCH CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO 2 COLLAPSE, I REJECT SOME OF THESE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE REVENUE FOR ADJOURNMENTS AND DISPOSE OF THE CASE EX PARTE QUA THE REVENUE ON MERITS. 3. AFTER CONSIDERING THE PAPERS O N RECORD I AM OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHOULD CONSIDER THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE F OR EXEMPTION U/S 12AA OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT). THE ASSESSEE HAS SOUGHT THIS EXEMPTION IN THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS AND THE TRIBUNAL HAS THE POWER TO ADMIT SUCH A LEGAL CLAIM AND REMIT THE SAME. HENCE I ADMIT THIS CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE AND RESTORE THE MATTER TO THE FILE OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR FRESH ADJUDICATION OF THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE U/S 12AA OF THE ACT. 4. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 1 0 T H AUGUST, 2016. S D / - (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: THE 1 0 T H AUGUST, 2016 MANGA 3 COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1 . APPELLANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT 4 . CIT(A) 5 . DR, ITAT - TRUE COPY - BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR