Umed Singh, Faridabad V. ITO, Faridabad

ITA 2949/DEL/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 81717 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 3 month(s) 11 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-09-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2014
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 13-06-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SAMEER SHARMA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : H NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S.SIDHU , JM AND AND SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM ITA NO: 2949 /DEL/20 1 2 A Y : - 200 8 - 09 SH.UMED SINGH VS. ITO, WARD 1(5) S/O SHRI RANJIT SINGH FARIDABAD H.NO. 2817 A, HOUSING COLONY SECTOR 3, FARIDABAD PAN: AZNPS 5244 G (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SH. SAMEER SHARMA, SR.D.R. O R D E R PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 16.03.2012 OF LD.CIT(A) , FARIDABAD FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 200 8 - 09 . 2. ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 24.09.2014 , NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF TH E ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED. THE NOTICE SENT WAS RETURNED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARK LEFT . WE FIND FROM THE RECORD THAT ON EARLIER OCCASION S ALSO THE APPEAL HAD BEEN ADJOURNED. HENCE WE PRESUME THAT TH E ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 2 3. FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD. 38 ITD, 320 (DELHI), AND THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S CHEMIPOL VS. UOI AND OTHERS IN C ENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 62/2009 JUDGEMENT DT. 17 TH SEPTEMBER,2009, WE CONSIDER IT A FIT CASE FOR DISMISSING THE APPEALS IN LIMINE, AS NOT ADMITTED. WE MAY LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY, IF THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON - APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24 TH SEPTEMBER ,2014. SD/ - SD/ - ( H.S.SIDHU ) ( J.SUDHAKAR REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: THE 24 TH SEPTEMBER , ,2014 *MANGA 3 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT; 2.RESPONDENT; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR; 6.GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR