Income tax Officer, V. Satish Madhukar Dighe, Nashik

ITA 2967/PUN/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0277 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-12-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2018
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 28-12-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Retrospective amendment; Tax effect
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B , PUNE , , BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM . / ITA NO. 2 967 /P U N/201 6 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 1 0 - 1 1 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 1 (5) , NASHIK . / APPELLANT VS. SHRI SATISH MADHUKAR DIGHE PROP. M/S. S.R. ENTERPRISES, SHOP NO.18, RUPSHREE, DINDORI NAKA, PANCHAVATI, N ASHIK 422003 . / RESPONDENT PAN: A DRPD2083Q / APPELLANT BY : SHRI SUDHENDU DAS / RESPONDENT BY : NONE / DATE OF HEARING : 0 6 . 1 2 .201 8 / DATE OF PRON OUNCEMENT: 11 . 1 2 .201 8 / ORDER PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, J M : THE APPEAL FILED BY REVENUE IS AGAINST ORDER OF CIT (A) - 1 , NASHIK , DATED 06 . 1 0.2016 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 1 0 - 1 1 AGAINST ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 153C R.W.S. 143(3) OF THE INCOME - T AX ACT , 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) . 2. THE CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR NO.3/2018 , DATED 11 . 07 . 2018 HAS REVISED THE MONETARY LIMITS FOR FILING OF APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT. THE TAX EFFECT IN DISPUTE IN THE CAPTIONED APP EAL IS STATED ITA NO. 2967 /P U N/ 20 1 6 SHRI SATISH MADHUKAR DIGHE 2 TO BE BELOW THE MONETARY LIMIT OF 20.00 LA KHS SPECIFIED IN THE CBDT CIRCULAR DATED 11 . 07 . 2018 (SUPRA). 3. IN THIS BACKGROUND, THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE WAS REQUIRED TO STATE H IS POSITION; HE HAS NOT REFERRED TO ANY MATERIAL WHICH WOULD SHOW THAT THE CAPTI ONED APPEAL IS PROTECTED BY ANY OF THE EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN PARA 10 OF THE CIRCULAR (SUPRA). 4. WITHOUT GOING INTO THE MERIT OF THE ISSUES RAISED IN THE CAPTIONED APPEAL, THIS APPEAL IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN/NOT PRESSED AS ITS FILING IS IN CONTRAV ENTION OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR DATED 11 . 07 . 2018 (SUPRA). BEFORE PARTING, WE CLARIFY HERE THAT THE REVENUE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RE - INSTITUTION OF APPEAL, IF THE REQUISITE MATERIAL IS BROUGHT TO SHOW THAT THE APPEAL IS PROTECTED BY THE EXCEPTIONS PRESCRIBED IN PARA 10 OF THE CIRCULAR (SUPRA). 5 . IN CONCLUSION, BY APPLYING THE CBDT C IRCULAR DATED 11 . 07 . 2018 (SUPRA), THE CAPTIONED APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN/NOT PRESSED. 6 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF REVENUE IS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 11 TH D AY OF DECEM B ER , 201 8 . SD/ - SD/ - (AN IL CHATURVEDI) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE ; DATED : 11 TH DECE M BER , 201 8 . GCVSR ITA NO. 2967 /P U N/ 20 1 6 SHRI SATISH MADHUKAR DIGHE 3 / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT ; 2. / THE RESPONDENT; 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - 1 , NASHIK ; 4. THE PR. CIT - 1 , NASHIK ; 5. 6. , , / DR B , ITAT, PUNE ; / GUARD FILE . / BY ORDER , // TRUE COPY // / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY , / ITAT, PUNE