IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH D NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 3050/DEL./2014 ASSTT. YEAR : 2009 - 10 JUBILANT ENERGY (KHARSANG) PVT. LTD., VS. ACIT, CIRCLE 4(1), A - 80, SECTOR 2, NOIDA. NEW DELHI (PAN: AABCE 2251K) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. MONA SINGH, CIT/DR DATE OF HEARING : 20.03.2017 DATE OF PRONOU NCEMENT : 20 .03.2017 ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2014 PASSED BY LEARNED CIT(A) - VIII, NEW DELHI FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 200 9 - 10 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE THE NOTICE SENT THROUGH REGISTER POST AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN COLUMN NO. 10 OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS ALSO COME ON RECORD. THEREFORE, IT CAN BE SAFELY INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE LEFT WITH US IS TO DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. SUPPORT IS DRAWN FROM THE ORDER OF TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS . MULTI PLAN INDIA (P) ITA NO. 3050/DEL./2014 2 LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. BEFORE PARTING, WE THINK IT APPROPRIATE TO ADD THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS ABLE TO SHOW REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NON - REPRE SENTATION ON THE DATE OF HEARING, THEN IT MAY, IF SO ADVISED, PRAY FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER AND DECISION ON MERITS. 4 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20.03.2017 . SD/ - SD/ - ( H.S. SIDHU ) (L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 20.03.2017 *AKS/ - COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI