IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: AHMEDABAD A BENCH (BEFORE S/SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI JM & A.N.PAHUJA, AM ) ITA NO. 3072/AHD/2010 ASSTT. YEAR:- 2007-08 M/S RAMKABIR TYRES. MAHAMAYA KRUPA DHAM,DHULIA ROAD,VYARA,SURAT [PAN:AAJFS9309K] VS ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 AAYAKAR BHAVAN,MAJURA GATE,SURAT (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI S.K.MEENA, DR O R D E R A.N. PAHUJA: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ON 16.11 .2010 AGAINST AN ORDER DATED 6.9.2010 OF THE LD. CIT(A)-I I, AHMEDABAD, UPHOLDING THE ADDITION OF RS.6,12,679 TOWARDS DIFFERENCE IN STOC K FOUND DURING SURVEY. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN TH E APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED. EVEN EARLIER WHEN APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 3.6.2011 , NONE APPEARED O N BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VS CIT [38 ITD 320] (DEL) AND THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CAS E OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT [(1996) 223 ITR 480 (MP)], THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 29.7.2011 SD/- SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER (A.N. PAHUJA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD DATED 29. 7.2011 . COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : ITA NO.3072/AHD/2010 2 THE ASSESSEE/ AC IT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,SURAT / THE CIT CONCERNED/ THE CIT(A)- II, AHMEDABAD/DR A BENCH/ GUARD FILE BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF ITAT, AHMEDABAD BENCH