IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. N.K. CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 321 (ASR)/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 PAN: BECPS3667E SH. AMRINDER SINGH S/O SH. JAGJIT SINGH, 141, LAJPAT NAGAR, JALANDHAR. VS. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JALANDHAR. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE. RESPONDENT BY: SH. RAHUL DHAWAN (LD. D.R.) DATE OF HEARING: 29/03/2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 29/03/2017 ORDER PER N. K. CHOUDHRY(JM): THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, FEELING AGGRIEVE D AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. CIT (A), JALANDHAR DATED 29.03.2016 FOR ASST. YEAR: 2009-10. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE OR ITS R EPRESENTATIVE PRESENT IN COURT NOR THERE WAS ANY APPLICATION FILED F OR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. IT APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PRO SECUTION OF HIS APPEAL, THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMST ANCES AND RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RU LES, 1963, AS THE ITA NO. 321(ASR)/2016 ASST. YEAR: 2009- 10 2 SAME WAS CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN IND IA LTD, REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320(DEL.), WE FEEL IT APPROPRIAT E TO DISMISS THE APPEAL UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING F OR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER BY EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-APPEARANCE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29.03.2017. SD/- SD/- (T.S. KAPOOR) (N.K. CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL M EMBER DATED: 29/03/2017 GP/SR.PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE ASSESSEE: 2. THE 3. THE CIT(A) 4. THE CIT 5. THE SR DR, ITAT, AMRITSAR. TRUE COPY BY ORDER INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AMRITSAR BENCH: AMRITSAR.