N. KRISHNAMURTHY, TRICHY V. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

ITA 321/CHNY/2023

AI Insights

The case involves four appeals by the assessee, N. Krishnamurthy, against the common order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, which confirmed the disallowance of agricultural income declared by the assessee for the specified assessment years. The assessee, a close associate of a former minister, had his assessments remitted back to the Assessing Officer following a search and seizure operation. The Assessing Officer disallowed the agricultural income declared by the assessee, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal, however, found merit in the assessee's appeal based on the certificates from the Village Administrative Officer, which detailed the extent of agricultural land owned and the income earned therefrom.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 135394 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-06-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 07-06-2023
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 13-03-2023
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 143(3); 142(1); 143(2); 158BC

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’बी’ Ɋायपीठ, चेɄई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ SMC BENCH, CHENNAI ŵी वी दुगाŊ राव Ɋाियक सद˟ के समƗ Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.318, 319, 320 & 321/Chny/2023 िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Years: 1996-97, 1997-98, 2000-01 & 2001-02 N. Krishnamurthy, Muthuraja, Plantain Commission Merchant, Gandhi Market, Trichy 620 008. [PAN:AAIPM4028N] Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3(2), Chennai 600 034. (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) (ŮȑथŎ/Respondent) अपीलाथŎ की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri M. Karunakaran, Advocate ŮȑथŎ की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 08.06.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 12.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R These four appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the common order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, dated 17.02.2023 relevant to the assessment years 1996-97, 1997-98, 2000-01 and 2001-02. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and stated to be a close associate of Shri Ku. Pa. Krishnan, Ex-Minister, Government of Tamil Nadu in whose case a search was conducted and subsequently, order under section 158BC r.w.s. 143(3) r.w.s. 254 r.w.s. 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] was passd on I.T.A. Nos. 318 to 321/Chny/23 2 28.03.2013. In the case of the assessee, the assessment order dated 31.03.1999 was passed under section 143(3) determining the total income at ₹.96,170/-. Vide order in ITA No. 169/Mds/2000 dated 09.05.2012 and corrigendum dated 10.07.2012 for the assessment year 1996-97, the Tribunal has set aside the assessment and remitted the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. For other assessment years also, the matter was remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer issued notice under sections 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act asking the assessee to file submissions. After considering the reply, the Assessing Officer has completed the assessment by disallowing the agricultural income declared by the assessee of ₹.35,590/- for AY 1996-97, ₹.55,590/- for AY 1997-98, ₹.85,000/- for AY 2000-01 and ₹.1,20,000/- for AY 2001-02. On appeal, by passing common order for all the assessment years under appeal, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer on the ground that the assessee has failed to submit the details and evidences to support the grounds. 3. On being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. By filing copy of the certificate issued by the Village Administrative Officer, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee has owned 3.63 acres of agricultural lands at Allathur I.T.A. Nos. 318 to 321/Chny/23 3 Village, where plantain was grown and earned net income of ₹.50,000/- per acre per annum. It was further submission that the assessee also owned 3.63.5 acres of agricultural lands and by cultivating, he has earned net income of ₹.5,000/- per acre per annum. It was also submitted that the above details including adangal(s) were already submitted before the authorities below during the course of first round of litigation and therefore, no new material could be able to produce during set aside assessment proceedings. Since the Revenue authority of the State Government issued the certificate with survey numbers and extent of the agricultural land owned by the assessee, the ld. Counsel has prayed for deleting the addition made towards disallowance of agricultural income. 4. On the other hand, the ld. DR supported the orders of authorities below. 5. Heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below and examined the certificates issued by the Village Administrative Officer. In the certificate, the VAO has clearly mentioned the extent of agricultural land owned by the assessee, crop raised and agricultural income earned. The certificate issued by the VAO on 13.11.1997, it has been clearly mentioned that out of agricultural land, the assessee earned net income of ₹.50,000/- per I.T.A. Nos. 318 to 321/Chny/23 4 acre per annum in Alathur Village, which was subsequently confirmed by the another VAO on 31.03.2004 that ₹.50,000/- per acre per annum has been earned from the agricultural lands to the extent of 3,.63 acre. Similarly, the VAO of Piratiyur West Village, Srirangam taluk, issued the certificate that the assessee owned agricultural lands to the extent of 3.63.5 acres and earned income of ₹.5,000/- per acre per annum. Since the above details were already travelled at various stages, it is opined that the genuine claim of the agricultural income has to be allowed. Accordingly, the additions made towards disallowance of agricultural income are deleted for all the assessment years under appeal. 7. In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced on 12 th June, 2023 at Chennai. Sd/- (V. DURGA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER Chennai, Dated, 12.06.2023 Vm/- आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant, 2.ŮȑथŎ/ Respondent, 3.आयकर आयुƅ/CIT, 4. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध/DR & 5. गाडŊ फाईल/GF.