IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH C, BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE GEORGE. K, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOS.322 & 323/(BANG/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2 004-06 & 2005-06) MS INTERGARDEN (IND.) PVT.LTD., NO.29/A, MALLARABANAWADI VILLAGE, KUNIGAL MAIN ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562 123 APP ELLANT PAN NO.AAACI7692H VS THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(4), BANGALORE. R ESPONDENT ASSESEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGGARWALA, JCIT DATE OF HEARING : 11-04-2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11-04-2016 O R D E R PER SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THESE TWO APPEALS, AT THE INSTANCE OF ASSESSEE, ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF CIT(A)-I, BANGALORE DATED 16-12-2013. THE RELEV ANT ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2004-05 & 2005-06. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING ON 11-04-2016. IT TRANSPIRES FROM THE R ECORD THAT THE NOTICE OF 2 ITA NOS.322 & 323(B)14 HEARINGS WERE DULY SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE VIDE ACKN OWLEDGEMENT AVAILABLE ON RECORD. ACCORDINGLY, IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTAN CES OF THE CASE, WE ARE OF THE VIEW, THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PU RSUE ITS APPEALS. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE CO-ORDINATE BENCH IN THE CASE O F CIT VS M/S MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT.) LTD., (38 ITD 320) THE APPEALS FILED B Y THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSE E ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 11 TH APRIL, 2016. SD/- SD/- (ABRAHAM P GEORGE) (GEORGE GEORGE K ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AM* PLACE: BANGALORE DATED : 11-04-2016 COPY TO : 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE REVENUE 3. THE CIT CONCERNED. 4. THE CIT(A) CONCERNED. 5. DR 6. GF BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, BANGALORE.