Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2015] 134 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1375 (ITAT-PANAJI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
1 month(s) 8 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
14-09-2015
Appeal Filed By
Department
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
DB
Assessment Year
2012-2013
Appeal Filed On
05-08-2015
Judgement Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI , HONBLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, HONBLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 318 /PNJ/201 5 (ASST. YEAR : 2012 - 13 ) IT O , WARD - 1 , GOKAK . VS. M/S. KURUHINSHETTY URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUDALAGI, TAL : GOKAK , DIST. BELGAUM. PAN NO. AAAA K 1754 G (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 31 9 /PNJ/201 5 (ASST. YEAR : 20 12 - 13 ) IT O , WARD - 1 , GOKAK . VS. THE KALLOLI URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., KALLOLI , TAL : GOKAK, DIST. BELGAUM. PAN NO. AAAA T 4834 C (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 3 20 /PNJ/201 5 (ASST. YEAR : 20 12 - 13 ) ITO , WARD - 1 , GOKAK . VS. SHRI GAYATRI URBAN CREDIT SOUHARD A SAHAKARI NIYAMIT, P.B. ROAD, HATTARGI, HUKKERI, DIST. BEL A GA VI . PAN NO. ABPFS 8940 K (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 3 2 1 /PNJ/201 5 (ASST. YEAR : 2012 - 13 ) ITO, WARD - 1, GOKAK. VS. M/S. SHIVABODHARANG URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUDALAGI, TAL : GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. PAN NO. AAAAS 6801 L (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) 2 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 ITA NO. 322 /PNJ/201 5 (ASST. YEAR : 2012 - 13 ) ITO, WARD - 1, GOKAK. VS. SHRI MAHALAXMI URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUDALAGI, TAL : GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. PAN NO. AAAAS 6803 J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 323 /PNJ/201 5 (ASST. YEAR : 2012 - 13 ) ITO, WARD - 1, GOKAK. VS. SHRI BASAVESHWAR URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUDALAGI, TAL : GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. PAN NO. AAAAS 680 0 M (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI J.D. KALPAVRIKSHA - CA DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI K.M. MAHESH - D R DATE OF HEARING : 14 / 0 9 /2015 . DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14 / 0 9 /201 5 . O R D E R PER N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TH ESE ARE THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDER S OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), BELGAUM /BELAGAVI, DATED 1 1 /0 5 /2015 , 18 /0 5 /2015 & 1 9 /0 5 /2015 . 2. THESE APPEAL S ARE BARRED BY LIMITATION BY 01 DAY. THE REVENUE HAS FILED CONDONATION APPLICATION S REQUESTING FOR CONDONING THE DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL S . AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE HA D NO OBJECTION TO THE CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL S BY THE REVENUE . WE FIND THAT THE REASONS GIVEN FOR DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL S 3 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 ARE RE ASONABLE HENCE, WE CONDONE THE DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL S BY THE REVENUE AND ADMIT THE APPEAL S FOR HEARING. 3 . THE SOLE ISSUE INVOLVED IN THESE APPEALS IS THAT THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ERRED IN ALLOWING DEDUCTION TO THE ASSESSEE UNDER SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. 4 . THE FACTS OF THE CASE ARE THAT THE ASSESSEES FILED RETURN OF INCOME AFTER CLAIMING DEDUCTION UNDER SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT. IT WAS CLAIMED THAT THE SOCIETY IS ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION UNDER SEC. 80P(2)( A)(I) AS IT WAS A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. HOWEVER, THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) WAS REJECTED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER IN THE ORDER PASSED UND ER SEC. 143(3) OF THE ACT ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS A COOPERATIVE BANK, AND HENCE, NOT ENTITLED TO CLAIM DEDUCTION BY VIRTUE OF SEC. 80P(4). 5 . ON APPEAL, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ALLOWED THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEES BY OBSERVING AS UN DER: - 6. I HAVE CAREFULLY PERUSED AND CONSIDERED THE AFORESAID SUBMISSION MADE BY THE APPELLANT AND THE CONTENTS OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER. I HAVE ALSO PERUSED THE CASE LAWS RELIED UPON BY THE APPELLANT AND THE ASSESSING OFFI CER. THE MAIN PLANK OF ARGUMENT OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS BEEN THAT AFTER CAREFUL ANALYSIS OF SECTION 80P(4) READ WITH SECTION 2(24)(VIIA) OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT, 1961 AND PART V OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT AND THE FACTS OF THE CASE, THE APPELLANT ASSE SSEE CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY IS HELD TO BE A 'PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK' HENCE IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SEC.80P(2)(A)(I) IN VIEW OF THE NEWLY INSERTED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80P(4). THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS ARRIVED AT A CONCLUSION THAT IF A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY SATISFIES ALL THE THREE CONDITIONS AS LAID DOWN IN THE DEFINITION AS GIVEN U/S 5(CCV) IN PART V OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949, THEN IT BECOMES A 'PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK', AND THEREF ORE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) CAN BE DENIED BY VIRTUE OF SEC.80P(4). 4 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 6.1 THE RELEVANT PART OF SECTION 80P OF THE I.T ACT UNDER WHICH THE APPELLANT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY HAS CLAIMED DEDUCTION READS AS UNDER: 'DEDUCTION IN RESPECT OF INCOME OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. 80P. (1) WHERE, IN THE CASE OF AN ASSESSEE BEING A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, THE GROSS TOTAL INCOME INCLUDES ANY INCOME REFERRED TO IN SUB - SECTION (2), THERE SHALL BE DEDUCTED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SE CTION, THE SUMS SPECIFIED IN SUB - SECTION (2), IN COMPUTING THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. (2) THE SUMS REFERRED TO IN SUB - SECTION (1) SHALL BE THE FOLLOWING, NAMELY: - (A) IN THE CASE OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN (I) CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS O F BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS, OR (II) ------------------------------ THE WHOLE OF THE AMOUNT OF PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ANY ONE OR MORE OF SUCH ACTIVITIES: 6.1.1 THE CLAUSE (4) OF SEC.80P INSERTED BY THE FINANCE ACT,2006 W.E.F. 01 - 04 - 2007, WHICH HAS BEEN INVOKED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO DENY DEDUCTION TO THE APPELLANT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY READS AS UNDER: (4) THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY IN RELATION TO ANY CO - OPERATIVE BANK OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY OR A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK. EXPLANATION: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUB - SECTION: (A) CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY SHALL HAVE THE MEANINGS RESPECTIVEL Y ASSIGNED TO THEM IN PART V OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 (10 OF 1949); (B) PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK MEANS A SOCIETY HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A TALUK AND THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF WHICH IS TO PROVI DE FOR LONG - TERM CREDIT FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. BY VIRTUE OF INTRODUCTION OF CLAUSE(4) IN SEC.80P, THE CO - OPERATIVE BANKS HAVE BEEN TAKEN OUT OF THE PURVIEW OF EXEMPTION GRANTED UNDER SEC.80P WHEREAS OTHER ENTITIES/COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES SPECIFIED IN OTHER CLAUSES OF SEC.80P CONTINUE TO ENJOY SUCH EXEMPTIONS. THE EXPLANATION TO SEC.80P PROVIDES THAT CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY SHALL HAVE THE MEANINGS RESPECTIVELY ASSIGNED TO THEM IN PART V OF TH E BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 (10 OF 1949). 5 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 6.1.2 FOLLOWING THE PROVISIONS OF AFORESAID EXPLANATION TO SEC.80P, THE ASSESSING OFFICER, WITH A VIEW TO FIND OUT THE DEFINITION OF CO - OPERATIVE BANK HAS TAKEN RECOURSE TO THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE BANK ING REGULATION ACT, 1949. SL. NO. CATEGORY CLAUSE/SECTION OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 DEFINITION 1 2 3 4 1 CO - OPERATIVE BANK CLAUSE (CCI) OF SECTION 5 CO - OPERATIVE BANK MEANS A STATE CO - OPERATIVE BANK, A CENTRAL CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK 2 PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK CLAUSE (CCV) OF SECTION 5 PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK MEANS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY (1) THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF WHICH IS THE TRANSACTION OF B ANKING BUSINESS; (2) THE PAID UP SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES OF WHICH ARE NOT LESS THAN ONE LAKHS OF RUPEES; AND (3) THE BYE - LAWS OF WHICH DO NOT PERMIT ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS A MEMBER. 3 PRIMARY CREDIT SOCIETY CLAUSE (CCVI) OF SECTION 5 PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY MEANS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY OTHER THAN A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY (1) THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF WHICH IS THE TRANSACTION OF BANKING BUSINESS; (2) THE PAID UP SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES O F WHICH ARE NOT LESS THAN ONE LAKHS OF RUPEES; AND (3) THE BYE - LAWS OF WHICH DO NOT PERMIT ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS A MEMBER. THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS THUS MENTIONED THAT THE CO - OPERATIVE BANK INCLUDES PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK MEANS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY (1) THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF WHICH IS THE TRANSACTION OF BANKING BUSINESS; (2) THE PAID UP SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES OF WHICH ARE NOT LESS THAN ONE LAKHS OF RUPEES; AND (3) TH E BYE - LAWS OF WHICH DO NOT PERMIT ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS A MEMBER. 6.1.3 THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS CONCLUDED THAT THE APPELLANT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY SATISFIES ALL THE ABOVE MENTIONED THREE CONDITIONS AND THEREFORE IT IS HELD TO BE A PRIMARY COOPERATIVE BANK AND HENCE ITS CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) HAS BEEN DENIED U/S 80P(4). BEFORE ARRIVING AT THIS CONCLUSION THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS ALSO REFERRED TO THE NEWLY INSERTED PROVISIONS OF SEC.2(24)(VIIA), INSERTED BY THE FINAN CE ACT,2006 W.E.F. 01 - 04 - 2007 WHICH READS AS UNDER: 6 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 (24) INCOME INCLUDES - (VIIA) THE PROFITS AND GAINS OF ANY BUSINESS OF BANKING (INCLUDING PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES) CARRIED ON BY A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY WITH ITS MEMBERS; THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS CONTENDED THAT THE PURPOSE OF INTRODUCTION OF THESE PROVISIONS WAS TO TAX THE PROFITS AND GAINS OF ANY BUSINESS OF BANKING (INCLUDING PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES) CARRIED ON BY A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY WITH ITS MEMBERS. THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS ALSO REFERR ED TO THE DEFINITION OF BANKING AS PROVIDED IN SEC.5(B) OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT,1949 WHICH READS AS UNDER: (B)BANKING MEANS THE ACCEPTING FOR THE PURPOSE OF LENDING OR INVESTMENT, OF DEPOSIT OF MONEY FROM PUBLIC, REPAYABLE ON DEMAND OR OTHERWISE, AND WITHDRAWAL BY CHEQUE, DRAFT, ORDER OR OTHERWISE. THE A.O HAS COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE APPELLANT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS DOING BANKING BUSINESS AS PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO MEMBERS IS AKIN TO BANKING BUSINESS AND SINCE THE MEM BERSHIP IS OPEN TO PUBLIC, IT IS ACCEPTING DEPOSITS FROM PUBLIC WHICH CAN BE WITHDRAWN BY ANY ONE OF THE SPECIFIED MEANS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ABOVE MENTIONED DEFINITION OF BANKING. 6.1.4. SIMILAR ISSUE IS ALSO INVOLVED IN A NUMBER OF CASES PERTAINING TO CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES WHICH ARE ALSO IN APPEAL AND THEY HAVE ALL CONTESTED THE ACTION OF THE AO IS INVOKING THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4) IN THEIR RESPECTIVE CASES ON THE BASIS OF VARIOUS CONTENTIONS DISCUSSED HEREIN BELOW. 6.2 THE APPELLANTS ON T HE OTHER HAND HAS CHALLENGED THE INTERPRETATION OF SECTIONS 80P(2), 80P(4) AND RELEVANT PROVISION OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 AS ADOPTED BY THE A.O IN HIS ASSESSMENT ORDER. THE APPELLANTS HAVE ALSO CONTENDED THAT THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE AS REVEALED BY THE SPEECH OF THE FINANCE MINISTER WAS NOT TO DENY DEDUCTION TO ALL THE COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES BY INTRODUCTION OF SEC. 80P(4). 6.2.1 IT HAS ALSO BEEN A CONTENTION OF THE APPELLANTS THAT TO FULFIL THE FIRST CONDITION FOR BECOMING A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE BANK, THE SOCIETY SHOULD CARRY ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING AS PER THE DEFINITION OF BANKING IN BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949. THE APPELLANTS HAVE ALSO CONTENDED THAT THE RESPECTIVE APPELLANT ASSESSEE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA COOPER ATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 IS CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS OF PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITY TO ITS MEMBERS AND IS NOT ALLOWED TO ISSUE CHEQUES, DRAFTS, PAY ORDERS, ETC. AS PER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, PERMISSION OF 7 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA IS REQUIRED TO ISSUE CHEQ UES, DRAFTS AND PAY ORDERS, ETC. AND THE RESPECTIVE APPELLANT HAS NOT OBTAINED ANY SUCH LICENSE/PERMISSION FROM THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA TO CARRY ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING. 6.2.2 THE APPELLANT COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES HAVE CONTENDED THAT THE EXPLANATORY NOTE TO MEMORANDUM EXPLAINING THE PROVISIONS IN THE FINANCE BILL, 2006 WHEREIN THE HON'BLE FINANCE MINISTER EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF TAX BENEFITS AVAILABLE TO CERTAIN CO - OPERATIVE BANKS, THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE SAID NOTES IS REPRODUCED HE REINBELOW: 'SECTION 80P, INTER ALIA, PROVIDES FOR A DEDUCTION FROM THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS, OR BUSINESS OF COTTAGE INDUSTRY, OR OF MARKETING OF AGRICULT URAL PRODUCE OF ITS MEMBERS, OR PROCESSING, WITHOUT THE AID OF POWER, OF THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE OF ITS MEMBERS, ETC. THE CO - OPERATIVE BANKS ARE FUNCTIONING AT PAR WITH OTHER COMMERCIAL BANKS, WHICH DO NOT ENJOY ANY TAX BENEFITS. IT IS, THEREFORE, PROPOSE D TO AMEND SECTION SOP BY INSERTING A NEW SUB - SECTION (4) SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE SAID SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY IN RELATION TO ANY CO - OPERATIVE BANK OTHER THAN PRIMARY CREDIT SOCIETY OR A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVEL OPMENT BANK. IT IS ALSO PROPOSED TO DEFINE THE EXPRESSIONS 'CO - OPERATIVE BANK', 'PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY' AND 'PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK'. IT IS ALSO PROPOSED TO INSERT A NEW SUB - CLAUSE (VIIA) IN CLAUSE (24) O F THE SECTION 2 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROFITS AND GAINS OF ANY BUSINESS OF BANKING (INCLUDING PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES) CARRIED ON BY A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY WITH ITS MEMBERS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE DEFINITION OF 'INCOME'. THIS AMENDMENT WILL TAKE E FFECT FROM 1ST APRIL, 2007 AND WILL, ACCORDINGLY, APPLY IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007 - 08 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS.' THE APPELLANTS HAVE THUS CONTENDED THAT IT WAS CLEAR THAT THE INTENTION OF THE FINANCE MINISTER WAS TO TAX 'CO - OPERATIVE BANKS' ONLY. 6.2.3 THE APPELLANTS HAVE RELIED ON THE DECISION IN THE CASES OF (I) KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH )0RDER IN THE CASE OF CIT VS SRI BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA BAGALKOT ITA 5006/2013 DT 5TH FEB 2014 WHEREIN APART FROM THE DEC IDING ON SECTION 263 IT HAS ALSO HELD, ON SECTION 80P THAT ' AS THE ASSESSEE IS NOT A COOPERATIVE BANK CARRYING ON EXCLUSIVELY BANKING BUSINESS AND AS IT DOES NOT POSSESS A LICENCE FROM RESERVE 8 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 BANK OF INDIA TO CARRY ON BUSINESS , IT IS NOT A COOPERATIVE B ANK. (II) THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), MYSORE & OTHERS VS GENERAL INSURANCE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD ITA NO 273/2013 DT 27.6.2014. (III) KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF VASAVI MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA, ITA NO. 505/2013 DATED 27/06/2014. (IV) CIT VS JAFARI MOM IN VIKAS COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD ITA 442,443 & 863 OF 2013 OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT. (V) TARAMANI MANILA COOP CREDIT SOCIETY VS ITO WARD 1(2), BELG AUM ITA 229 & 230/PNJ/2013DT 28.2.2014 (VI) ITAT BANGALORE B BENCH DECISION VIDE ITA NO 1069/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASST YEAR 2007 - 08 OF M/S BANGALORE COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT COOP SOCIETY LTD, BANGALORE. (VII) ITO VS YESHWANTPUR CREDIT COOP SOCIETY LTD ITA NO 717/BANG/2011 DT 11.4.2012 RENDERED BY ITAT A BENCH, BANGALORE. (VIII) M/S JAYALAKSHMI MAHILA VIVIDODESHAGALA SOUHARADA SAHAKARI LTD & ANOTHER IN ITA NO 01 TO 03/PNJ/2012 AND ITA 04 TO 06/PNJ/2012. THE APPELLANTS HAVE CLAIMED THAT IN ALL THESE CASES IT WAS HELD THAT INCOME EARNED BY CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY FROM ITS ACT OF LENDING MONEY TO MEMBERS SHALL BE ELIGIBLE FOR EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT. 7. THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS RELATING TO THE ISSUES IN THIS CASE HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AND DEC IDED BY VARIOUS ITATS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. THE JURISDICTIONAL ITAT OF BANGALORE BENCH IN A NUMBER OF CASES WHILE DECIDING THE ISSUE IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEES HAS HELD THAT THE COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ARE NOT DOING BANKING BUSINESS AND THEREFORE, THE PROVISIO NS OF SECTION 80P(4) ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THEM. THE JURISDICTIONAL ITAT PANJIM BENCH HAS ALSO IN A NUMBER OF CASES WHERE THE ASSESSEE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS AND NOT ACCEPTING DEPOSIT FROM PUBLIC AS EVIDEN CED FROM THEIR BYE LAWS OR THE COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACCEPTING OTHER COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AS MEMBERS HAVE HELD THAT THOSE COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ARE ENTITLES TO THE BENEFIT OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE I.T. ACT. 9 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 8. NOW, AFTER THE GUJARAT HIG H COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS JAFARI MOM IN VIKAS COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD ITA 442, 443 & 863 OF 2013 DECIDING THE ISSUE IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE, THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT IN THE CASES OF CIT VS SRI BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA BAGAL KOT ITA 5006/2013 DT 5 TH FEB 2014, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), MYSORE & OTHERS VS GENERAL INSURANCE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD ITA NO 273/2013 DT 27.6.2014 AND KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF VASAVI MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA SAHA KARI NIYAMITA, ITA NO. 505/2013 DATED 27/06/2014 HAS ALSO DECIDED THE ISSUE IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. 8.1 NOW A QUESTION WHICH MAY BE ASKED IN THE CASE OF THE APPELLANT BEING A SOUHARDA IS; WHETHER, SOUHARDA IS A CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY WITHIN THE ME ANING OF SECTION 80P/2(19) OF THE L.T. ACT.? SINCE THE DEDUCTION U/S80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 IS AVAILABLE TO THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, IT IS IMPERATIVE TO GO INTO THE DEFINITION OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY WHICH HAS BEEN SPECIFICALLY DEFINED IN SECT ION 2(19) OF THE ACT. SECTION 2(19) READS AS FOLLOWS; CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY MEANS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1912 (2 OF 1912), OR UNDER ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE IN ANY STATE FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES; THIS DEFINITION HAS TWO PARTS: CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY MEANS (1) A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY (2) REGISTERED (A) UNDER THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1912 (2 OF 1912), OR (B) UNDER ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE IN ANY STATE FOR THE REGISTRATION OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES; 8.1.1 AS FAR AS FIRST PART OF THE DEFINITION GIVEN IN SECTION 2(19) IS CONCERNED, A SOUHARDA IS A SOCIETY WHICH IS COOPERATIVE IN NATURE AND THUS IT IS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. THE DICTIONARY MEANING OF SOCIETY AS PER OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY IS: AN ASSOCIATION OR BODY OF PEOPLE UNITED BY A COMMON AIM, INTEREST, BELIEF, PROFESSION ETC. THE WEBESTER DICTIONARY GIVES THE MEANING OF SOCIETY AS; 10 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 A VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION OF INDIVIDUALS FOR C OMMON ENDS; ESPECIALLY: AN ORGANIZED GROUP WORKING TOGETHER OR PERIODICALLY MEETING BECAUSE OF COMMON INTERESTS, BELIEFS, OR PROFESSION GOING BY THE BYE LAWS OF THE SOUHARDAS AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI ACT, 1997, IT IS CLEAR THA T THE SOUHARDAS ARE SOCIETIES WHICH ARE COOPERATIVE IN NATURE. THEY ARE REGISTERED UNDER AN ACT WHICH PROVIDES FOR RECOGNITION, ENCOURAGEMENT AND VOLUNTARY FORMATION OF CO - OPERATIVES BASED ON SELF HELP, MUTUAL AID, WHOLLY OWNED, MANAGED AND CONTROLLED BY M EMBERS AS ACCOUNTABLE, COMPETITIVE, SELF RELIANT AND ECONOMIC ENTERPRISES GUIDED BY CO - OPERATIVE PRINCIPLES AND MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH. IT IS ALSO WORTH NOTING THAT THE WORD CO - OPERATIVE HAS BEEN USED ON INNUMERABLE OCCASIONS IN THE KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI ACT, 1997. A FEW EXAMPLES OF WHICH ARE: A. SECTION 4(1) - CO - OPERATIVES WHICH MAY BE REGISTERED: - NO CO - OPERATIVE SHALL BE REGISTERED UNDER THIS ACT, UNLESS B. SECTION 6(1) - CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION: - WHERE A CO - OPERATIVE IS REGISTERED OR DEEMED TO BE REGISTERED, THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DULY SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE REGISTRAR SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CO - OPERATIVE MENTIONED THEREIN, IS A COOPERATIVE REGISTERED OR DEEMED TO BE REGISTERED UNDER THIS ACT. C. SECT ION 10(1) - BYE LAWS - SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT OR RULES, EVERY COOPERATIVE SHALL FUNCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS BYE - LAWS WHICH AS FAR AS POSSIBLE SHALL ADHERE TO THE CO - OPERATIVE PRINCIPLES. D. SECTION 32(1) - MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS, ACCOUN TS, ETC : - EVERY CO - OPERATIVE SHALL MAINTAIN AT ITS REGISTERED OFFICE THE FOLLOWING, NAMELY: - E. SECTION 33(1) - AUDIT : - EVERY COOPERATIVE SHALL GET ITS ACCOUNTS AUDITED ATLEAST ONCE A YEAR F. SECTION 35(1) - INQUIRY: - THE REGISTRAR MAY CONDUCT AN INQUIR Y OR CAUSE AN INQUIRY TO BE CONDUCTED EXPEDITIOUSLY INTO ANY SPECIFIC MATTER TOUCHING THE CONSTITUTION, MANAGEMENT, WORKING OR FINANCIAL CONDITIONS OF A COOPERATIVE. G. SECTION 47(1) - WINDING UP OF A CO - OPERATIVE : - ON AN APPLICATION MADE BY NOT LESS THA N ONE - FIFTH OF THE MEMBERS OF A CO - OPERATIVE TO WIND UP THE AFFAIRS OF 11 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 THE SAID COOPERATIVE, THE BOARD SHALL CONVENE A GENERAL - MEETING BY ISSUING A NOTICE TO EACH MEMBER 8.1.2 SOUHARDAS SATISFY THE SECOND PART OF THE DEFINITION ALSO AS THEY ARE REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI ACT,1997, AN ACT IN FORCE IN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN ADDITION TO THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT. 8.1.3 FURTHER, IN A NUMBER OF DECISIONS BY THE PANJIM AND BANGALORE BEN CHES OF THE ITAT AND BY THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT, NO DISTINCTION HAS BEEN DRAWN BETWEEN THE SOUHARDAS AND THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AS FAR AS THE APPLICABILITY OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80P OF THE ACT ARE CONCERNED. SOME OF SUCH DECISIONS ARE: (I) KARN ATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH )ORDER IN THE CASE OF CIT VS SRI BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA, BAGALKOT ITA 5006/2013 DT 5 TH FEB 2014. (II) KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF VASAVI MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA, ITA NO. 505/2013 DATED 27/06/2014. (III) M/S JAYALAKSHMI MAHILA VIVIDODESHAGALA SOUHARADA SAHAKARI LTD & ANOTHER IN ITA NO 01 TO 03/PNJ/2012 AND ITA 04 TO 06/PNJ/2012. (IV) DCIT VS. M/S DWARKA SOUHARDA CREDIT SAHAKARI LTD. ITA NO.04 - 06/PNJ/2012 8.1.4 THUS, IT IS AMPLY CLEAR THAT SOUHARDAS ARE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961. MOREOVER, IT IS NOT THE CASE OF THE A.O THAT THE APPELLANT SOUHARDA IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 8 0P OF THE L.T. ACT. 8.2 THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN THE CASE OF SRI BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA, SUPRA WHICH WAS FOLLOWED IN THE CASES OF GENERAL INSURANCE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, AND KARNATAKA HIGH COUR T DECISION IN THE CASE OF VASAVI MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA, ITA NO. 505/2013 DATED 27/06/2014. SUPRA, HAS CLEARLY HELD THAT A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED AS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO MEMBERS AND NOT REGISTERED WI TH THE RBI CANNOT BE DENIED THE EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE I.T. ACT. THE OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT READS AS FOLLOWS: 12 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 'THEREFORE, THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE IS CLEAR. IF A CO - OPERATIVE BANK IS EXCLUSIVELY CARRYING ON BANKING BUSI NESS, THEN THE INCOME DERIVED FROM THE SAID BUSINESS CANNOT BE DEDUCTED IN COMPUTING THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. THE SAID INCOME IS LIABLE FOR TAX. A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AS DEFINED UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT INCLUDES THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CRED IT SOCIETY OR A PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK. THE LEGISLATURE DID NOT WANT TO DENY THE SAID BENEFITS TO A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY OR A. PRIMARY CO - OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK. THEY DID NOT W ANT TO EXTEND THE SAID BENEFIT TO A CO - OPERATIVE BANK WHICH IS EXCLUSIVELY CARRYING ON BANKING BUSINESS I.E. THE PURPORT OF THIS AMENDMENT. THEREFORE, AS THE ASSESSEE IS NOT A COOPERATIVE BANK CARRYING ON EXCLUSIVELY BANKING BUSINESS AND AS IT DOES NOT POS SESS A LICENCE FROM RESERVE BANK OF INDIA TO CARRY ON BUSINESS, IT IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. IT IS A CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY WHICH ALSO CARRIES ON THE BUSINESS OF LENDING MONEY TO ITS MEMBERS WHICH IS COVERED UNDER SECTION 80P{2)(A}(I) I.E. CARRYING ON THE BUSINESS OF BANKING FOR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. THE OBJECT OF THE AFORESAID AMENDMENT IS NOT TO EXCLUDE THE BENEFIT EXTENDED UNDER SECTION 80P(1) TO SUCH SOCIETY ........................................IN THE INSTANT CASE, WHEN THE STATUS OF THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AND IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK, THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING AUTHORITY EXTENDING THE BENEFIT OF EXEMPTION FROM PAYMENT OF TAX UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT IS CORRECT. ' 8.3 THE FACT THAT THE APPELLANT IS A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT,1959 ENGAGED IN PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS HAS BEEN CLEARLY MENTIONED BY THE A.O IN PARA 3 OF HIS AFORESAID ASSESSMENT ORDER. IT IS ALSO NOT THE CASE OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER THAT THE ASSESSEE IS REGISTERED WITH THE RBI AS A BANK. IN ITS AFORESAID SUBMISSIONS DATED 27/10/2014 THE APPELLANT HAS CLEARLY STATED WITH THE HELP OF NECESSARY EVIDENCE AND AN AFFIDAVIT DATED 20/10/2014 T O THIS EFFECT THAT THE APPELLANT IS A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 ENGAGED IN PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES ONLY TO ITS MEMBERS AND IT DOES NOT POSSESS ANY BANKING LICENCE FROM THE RBI. IT IS THEREFORE, CLEAR THAT THE APPELLANT'S CASE IS SQUARELY COVERED BY THE AFORESAID DECISIONS OF THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN THE CASES OF SRI 13 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA. SUPRA WHICH WAS FOLLOWED IN THE CASE OF GENERAL INSURANCE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, AND KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF VASAVI MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA, ITA NO.505/2013 DATED 27/06/2014 SUPRA. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION AND RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE AFORESAID DECISIONS OF THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, IT IS HELD THAT THE APPELLANT'S CASE IS NOT COVERED BY SECTION 80P(4) AS IT IS NOT A 'CO - OPERATIVE BANK' AND THEREFORE, IT IS ENTITLED TO THE EXEMPTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE IT. ACT. 6 . THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE RELIED ON THE ORDERS OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER. HE COULD NOT POINT OUT ANY SPECIFIC ERROR IN THE ABOVE QUOTED ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS). THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) HAS ALLOWED THE CLA IM OF DEDUCTION UNDER SEC. 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT BY FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS OF THE HONBLE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF SRI BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA (SUPRA) AND IN THE CASE OF GENERAL INSURANCE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CRED IT SOCIETY LTD . (SUPRA). NO CONTRARY DECISION COULD BE CITED BY THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE. WE, THEREFORE, DO NOT FIND ANY GOOD AND JUSTIFIABLE REASON TO INTERFERE WITH THE ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), WHICH ARE HEREBY CONFIRME D AND THE GROUND OF APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. 7 . IN THE RESULT, APPEAL S OF THE REVENUE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT AT THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON MONDAY , THE 14 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 2015 AT GOA. S D / - S D / - (GEORGE MATHAN) (N.S.SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 14 TH SEPTEMBER, 2015. 14 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 VR/ - COPY TO: 1 . THE ASSESSEE. A . M/S. KURUHINSHETTY URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD B . THE KALLOLI URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD C . SHRI GAYATRI URBAN CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMIT D . M/S. SHIVABODHARANG URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD E . SHRI MAHALAXMI URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD F . SHRI BASAVESHWAR URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD 2 . THE REVENUE. A . ITO, WARD - 1, GOKAK. 3 . THE CIT 4 . THE CIT(A) 5 . THE D.R . 6 . GUARD FILE. BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I.T.A.T., PANAJI 15 ITA NO S . 318 - 323 /PNJ/201 5 DATE INITIAL ORIGINAL DICTATION PAD IS ENCLOSED WITH I.T.A.NO. 25 - 27/PNJ/2015 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 14 .0 9 .2015 SR.PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 15.09 .2015 SR.PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER 15 /0 9 /2015 JM/AM 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER 15 /0 9 /2015 JM/AM 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS/PS 15 /0 9 /2015 SR.PS 6. DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 14 /0 9 /2015 SR.PS 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 15 /0 9 /2015 SR.PS 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 9. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER
