P.S.CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI V. DCIT-CC- 1(3), MUMBAI

ITA 3228/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 117 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3437 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-05-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 15-05-2018
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: HARI S RAHEJA
• Keywords: Bogus purchase; Unexplained cash credit; Income from undisclosed sources; Search and seizure; Principle of natural justice; Question of law; Corroborative evidences; Accommodation entries; Assessment record; Bogus loan; TDS
• Section: 271(1)(c); 69C; 143(3); 133A; 133(6); 195; 147; 131; 68

Judgement Text

, , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES C , MUMBAI . , , , BEFORE SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER, ITA NO.2687, 2688 & 2689/MUM/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR:-2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S PABAL HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, 66B, 3 RD FLOOR, PODAR CHAMBERS, MUMBAI SAMACHAR MARG, MUMBAI-400001 / VS. DCIT, CC - 1(3), 905, OLD CGO ANNEX BUILDING, M. K. ROAD, MUMBAI-400020 ( /ASSESSEE) ( / REVENUE) P.A. NO.AAQFM8445I ITA NO.2692, 2693 & 2694/MUM/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR:-2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 POONAM SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION 66B, 3 RD FLOOR, PODAR CHAMBERS, MUMBAI SAMACHAR MARG, MUMBAI-400001 / VS. DCIT, CC - 1(3), 905, OLD CGO ANNEX BUILDING, M. K. ROAD, MUMBAI-400020 ( /ASSESSEE) ( / REVENUE) P.A. NO.AAHFP4019R 2 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. ITA NO.3226 TO 3229/MUM/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR:-2009-10, 2012-13, TO 2014-15 P.S. CONSTRUCTION 66B, 3 RD FLOOR, PODAR CHAMBERS, MUMBAI SAMACHAR MARG, MUMBAI-400001 / VS. DCIT, CC - 1(3), 905, OLD CGO ANNEX BUILDING, M. K. ROAD, MUMBAI-400020 ( /ASSESSEE) ( / REVENUE) P.A. NO.AAKFP4348Q ITA NO.2690/MUM/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR:-2012-13 POONAM SHANTI DEVELOPERS 66B, 3 RD FLOOR, PODAR CHAMBERS, MUMBAI SAMACHAR MARG, MUMBAI-400001 / VS. DCIT, CC - 1(3), 905, OLD CGO ANNEX BUILDING, M. K. ROAD, MUMBAI-400020 ( /ASSESSEE) ( / REVENUE) P.A. NO.AAMFP0302N ITA NO.2691/MUM/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR:-2013-14 POONAM MEGA DEVELOPERS 66B, 3 RD FLOOR, PODAR CHAMBERS, MUMBAI SAMACHAR MARG, MUMBAI-400001 / VS. DCIT, CC - 1(3), 905, OLD CGO ANNEX BUILDING, M. K. ROAD, MUMBAI-400020 ( /ASSESSEE) ( / REVENUE) P.A. NO.AAMFP4284F / ASSESSEE BY SHRI HARI S. RAHEJA & SHRI MANI JAIN / REVENUE BY SHIR AWUNGSHI GIMSON CIT- DR 3 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. !' # / DATE OF HEARING : 04/02/2019 ' # / DATE OF ORDER: 03/05/2019 / O R D E R PER BENCH THIS BUNCH OF 12 APPEALS FILED BY DIFFERENT ASSESSE ES AND ARE DIRECTED AGAINST SEPARATE, BUT IDENTICAL ORDERS OF THE LD. CIT(A), 47, MUMBAI, ALL DATED 28/02/2012 AND THEY P ERTAINS TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2012-1 3, 2013-14 AND 201415. SINCE, FACTS, ARE IDENTICAL AND ISSUES ARE COMMON, FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE, THESE APPEALS WERE HEARD TOGETHER AND ARE DISPOSED OF BY THIS CONSOLIDATED O RDER. ITA NO.2688/MUM/2018 2. ALL ASSESSEES HAVE MORE OR LESS FILED COMMON GR OUNDS OF APPEAL IN RESPECTIVE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL. FOR THE SAKE OF BREVITY, GROUNDS OF APPEAL TAKEN IN ITA NO.2688/MUM /2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 OF M/S PABAL HOUSING PV T. LTD. IS REPRODUCED HEREUNDER:- 1. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLAN T'S CASE AND IN LAW THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 47 (CITA) ERRED IN NOT HOLDING THAT THE LD. ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) HAS NOT FOLLOWE D THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE BY GRANTING EFFECTIVE OPPORTUNITY O F BEING HEARD AND PROVIDING MATERIAL/RECORD GATHERED DURING SEARCH/SU RVEY PROCEEDING IN THE THIRD PARTY'S CASE, IF ANY INTENDED TO BE USED AGAI NST THE APPELLANT. 2. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLANT' S CASE AND IN LAW THE LD. CITA ERRED IN NOT HOLDING THAT THE LD. AO ERRED IN MAKING THE VARIOUS ADDITIONS DISALLOWANCE MERELY RELYING ON THE AVERME NTS MADE BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. 4 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 3. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLANT' S CASE AND IN LAW THE LD. CITA ERRED IN CONFIRMING THE ADDITION OF SUM OF RS. 10,45,00,000/- MADE BY THE LD. AO IN RESPECT OF UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM THE PERSONS MENTIONED HEREIN BELOW AS ALLEGED ACCOMMODATION ENT RIES AND TREATING THE SAME AS ALLEGED UNEXPLAINED CREDITS: NAME OF THE PARTY AMOUNT MERIDIAN JEWELLERY PVT LTD 1,50,00,000 ROSE GEMS 2,45,00,000 SANKHALA EXPORTS 70,00,000 LITTLE DIAM 40,00,000 MOULI GEMS 2,00,00,000 ROSE IMPEX 3,00, 00,000 NICE DIAMONDS 40,00,000 TOTAL 10,45,00,000 4. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLANT' S CASE AND IN LAW THE LD. CITA ERRED IN CONFIRMING THE DISALLOWANCE OF RS. 98 ,30,414/- BEING INTEREST PAID ON UNSECURED LOANS BORROWED FROM PERSONS TREAT ED AS ALLEGED ACCOMMODATION TRANSACTIONS AS PER THE IMPUGNED ORDE R OR OTHERWISE. 5. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLANT' S CASE AND IN LAW THE LD. CITA ERRED IN CONFIRMING THE ADDITION OF RS. 20,20, 000/- ON ACCOUNT OF ALLEGED COMMISSION PAID ON ALLEGED ACCOMMODATION TR ANSACTIONS OF UNSECURED LOANS AS PER THE IMPUGNED ORDER OR OTHERW ISE. 6. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLANT' S CASE AND IN LAW THE LD. CITA ERRED IN CONFIRMING THE DISALLOWANCE AGGREGATI NG TO SUM OF RS. 90,81,012/- MADE BY THE AO BEING ALLEGED BOGUS PURC HASE OF RS. 63,17,640 FROM M/S ANIKET ENTERPRISES AND RS.27,63, 372/- FROM M/S AKASH INTERNATIONAL. 7. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE APPELLANT' S CASE AND IN LAW THE LD. CITA ERRED IN CONFIRMING THE ACTION OF THE AO IN NO T GRANTING THE SET-OFF OF LOSS INCURRED DURING THE YEAR AGAINST THE ADDITIONS /DISALLOWANCES AMOUNTING TO RS. 18,13,250/-. 3. BRIEFLY, STATED THE FACTS OF THE CASE ARE THAT T HE ASSESSEE IS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, FILED ITS RETURN OF INCOME FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14, ON DA TED 30/09/2013, DECLARING TOTAL INCOME AT RS.NIL. THE C ASE WAS SELECTED FOR SCRUTINY AND NOTICE U/S 143(2) AND 142 (1) INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER THE ACT) WERE ISSUED. IN RESPONSE TO NOTICES, THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSES SEE APPEARED FROM TIME TO TIME AND FILED VARIOUS DETAILS AS CALL ED FOR. DURING 5 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. THE COURSE OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, THE AO NOTICE D THAT DDIT(INV.), UNIT-9(2), MUMBAI, HAD INTIMATED VIDE L ETTER DATED 10/03/2014 THAT THE ASSESSEE IS ONE OF THE BENEFICI ARY OF ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES FOR LOANS FROM VARIOUS COMPAN IES CONTROLLED AND MANAGED BY MR. BHANWARLAL JAIN. THE SAID INFORMATION WAS FURTHER BASED ON SEARCH AND SEIZURE ACTION CONDUCTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE DGIT(INV.), MUMBAI, ON 03/10/2013 IN BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP OF CASES. DURIN G THE COURSE OF SEARCH, COPIOUS INCRIMINATING MATERIAL/ DOCUMENTS/PAPERS/DATA WERE FOUND AND SEIZED. DURING SEARCH OPERATION, A STATEMENT U/S 132(4) WAS RECORDED FROM SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN AND SEVERAL OTHER PERSONS, WHEREIN, IT HAS BEEN ADMITTED BY THEM THAT THEY WERE PROVIDING ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES FOR BOGUS SALES/PURCHASES/IMP ORT FOR OTHERS, THROUGH VARIOUS BENAMI CONCERNS. THE DOCUMENTS/SEIZED MATERIALS, WERE ANALYZED IN DETAIL BY MUMBAI INVESTIGATING WING, WHERE, IT WAS FURTHER NO TICED THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS ALSO ONE OF THE BENEFICIARIES OF S UCH ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES FOR LOANS PROVIDED BY BENAMI CONCERNS OF BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP. 6 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 4. THEREAFTER, SURVEY OPERATION U/S 133A WAS CARRIE D OUT ON 16/10/2014 ON M/S POONAM GROUP OF CASES TO WHICH TH E ASSESSEE BELONGS, ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION GATHE RED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH IN CASES OF M/S BHANWARLAL JAI N GROUP. DURING THE COURSE OF SURVEY ON POONAM GROUP, SHRI A SHWIN MEHTA, WHO LOOK AFTER THE FINANCIAL MATTERS OF THE GROUP INCLUDING RAISING OF FUNDS HAD ACCEPTED IN HIS STAT EMENT RECORDED U/S 131 THAT VARIOUS CONCERNS BELONGING TO POONAM GROUP HAVE INDEED OBTAINED LOANS AND ADVANCES IN DI FFERENT YEAR FROM VARIOUS CONCERNS MANAGED AND CONTROLLED B Y BHANWARLAL JAIN AND HIS SON SHRI RAJESH B. JAIN. F URTHER, DURING THE SURVEY U/S 133A OF THE ACT, IT WAS NOTIC ED THAT TRANSACTIONS WITH REGARD TO UNSECURED LOANS AND ADV ANCES OBTAINED FROM VARIOUS COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND MANA GED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN WERE SIMILAR IN THE NATURE OF ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES WITHOUT HAVING ANY COMMERCIAL SENSE. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION I NCLUDING NORMS WHICH WERE REQUIRED TO BE FOLLOWED WHILE GRAN TING LOANS AND ADVANCES WERE NOT FOLLOWED, WHICH IS EVIDENT FR OM THE ADMISSION MADE BY SHRI ASHWIN MEHTA IN HIS STATEMEN T RECORDED DURING COURSE OF SURVEY. 7 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 5. DURING THE COURSE OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, THE AO ON THE BASIS OF REPORT OF DGIT(INV.), COUPLED WITH INF ORMATION GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF SURVEY OPERATION IN T HE GROUP CASES OF M/S POONAM GROUP CAME TO THE CONCLUSION TH AT THE ASSESSEE IS ONE OF THE BENEFICIARIES OF BOGUS UNSEC URED LOANS TAKEN FROM COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND OPERATED BY SHR I BHNWARLAL JAIN. THEREFORE, IN ORDER TO ASCERTAIN TH E CORRECTNESS OF LOAN TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES, CALLED UP ON THE ASSESSEE TO FILE COMPLETE DETAILS OF LOANS AND ADVA NCES TAKEN FROM M/S MERIDIAN JEWELLERY PVT. LTD., M/S ROSE GEM S PVT. LTD., M/S SANKHALA EXPORTS, M/S LITTLE DIAM, M/S MO ULI GEMS, M/S ROSE IMPEX AND M/S NICE DIAMOND APPEARING IN TH E BOOKS OF THE ASSESSEE. IN RESPONSE TO NOTICE, THE ASSESSE E HAS FILED COMPLETE DETAILS OF LOANS AND ADVANCES TAKEN FROM A BOVE SAID CONCERNS INCLUDING CONFIRMATIONS FROM THE LOAN CRED ITORS, THEIR ITR ACKNOWLEDGMENT COPIES FILED FOR AY 2013-14, PRO FIT & LOSS ACCOUNT AND BALANCE SHEET ALONG WITH BANK STATEMENT S. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO FILED AFFIDAVIT FROM THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY TO SUPPORT THEIR CONTENTIONS TO CLAIM THAT UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM ABOVE COMPANIES ARE GENUINE LOANS WHICH ARE TAKEN UNDER NORMAL COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. IT WAS FURT HER 8 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. CONTENDED THAT LOANS WERE TAKEN THROUGH PROPER BANK ING CHANNEL AND ALSO INTEREST HAS BEEN PAID AFTER DEDUC TING NECESSARY TDS APPLICABLE AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF T HE ACT. THE ASSESSEE ALSO REPAID SAID LOANS IN THE NEXT FINANCI AL YEAR, THEREFORE, MERELY ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION RECEI VED FROM SOME THIRD PARTY SOURCE, GENUINE LOANS TAKEN FROM C ERTAIN PARTIES, CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS BOGUS ENTRIES, WHI CH CAN BE TAXED U/S 68 OF THE ACT. 6. THE AO, AFTER CONSIDERING RELEVANT SUBMISSIONS O F THE ASSESSEE AND ALSO AFTER THOROUGHLY DISCUSSING THE M ODUS OPERANDI EXPLAINED BY DGIT(INV.) DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH AND SURVEY OPERATIONS CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT T HE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO PROVE THE PRIMARY ONUS BY ESTABLISHIN G THE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS AND CREDITWOR THINESS OF THE PARTIES. THE AO, FURTHER OBSERVED THAT INFORMAT ION GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH IN CASES OF SHRI BHANWA RLAL JAIN AND ALSO SURVEY IN GROUP CASES OF M/S POONAM GROUP CLEARLY ESTABLISHED THE FACT THAT THE TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE MERE BOOK ENTRIES WITHOUT THERE BEING ANY COMME RCIAL ASPECT, THEREFORE, MERELY FOR FURNISHING CERTAIN DO CUMENTS TO PROVE THE IDENTITY AND PAYMENTS BY SAID LOANS THROU GH PROPER 9 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. BANKING CHANNELS WOULD NOT DISCHARGE INITIAL ONUS C AST UPON THE ASSESSEE U/S 68 OF THE ACT. ALTHOUGH, THE ASSES SEE HAS FILED ENORMOUS DETAILS IN RESPECT OF SAID LOANS BUT FACT REMAINS THAT THE INFORMATION GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARC H CLEARLY PROVES THE FACT THAT MR. BHANWARLAL JAIN AND ITS AS SOCIATES ARE CONTROLLED 70 ODD COMPANIES FOR PROVIDING BOGUS UNS ECURED LOANS FOR VARIOUS BENEFICIARIES. MR. BHANWARLAL JAI N, HIMSELF IN HIS STATEMENT ADMITTED THIS FACT BEFORE THE SEARCH PARTY. ALTHOUGH, THE ASSESSEE HAS DENIED ANY WRONG DOING B Y ACCEPTING ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES DURING THE COURSE O F SURVEY, BUT THE STATEMENT OF THE ASSESSEE CANNOT BE CONSIDE RED AS SACROSANCT, BECAUSE THE PERSON WHO IS INVOLVED IN P ROVIDING ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES HAD CATEGORICALLY ADMITTED IN HIS STATEMENT DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH THAT THESE AR E BOOK ENTRIES WITHOUT ANY ELEMENT OF COMMERCIAL ELEMENT I N THE SAID TRANSACTIONS. THE AO THOROUGHLY DISCUSSED THE ISSUE IN HIS ASSESSMENT ORDER AND ALSO DISCUSSED THE MODUS OPERA NDI OF COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND OPERATED BY MR. BHANWARLAL JAIN. FURTHER, THE AO ALSO IGNORED AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND MR. BHANWARLAL JAIN RETRACTING THE STATEMENT DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH ON THE GROUND THAT SUBSEQUENT EVENTS AND EVIDENCES 10 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. ARE ONLY A SELF SERVING DOCUMENTS, WHICH CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS VALID EVIDENCES IN ORDER TO GIVE CLEAN CHIT TO T HE ASSESSEE, WHEN THE DOCUMENTS COLLECTED DURING THE COURSE OF S EARCH AND SURVEY, PROVES OTHERWISE. THEREFORE, HE CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO PROVE THE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES . ACCORDINGLY, MADE ADDITIONS TOWARDS UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM ABOVE COMPANIES U/S 68 OF THE ACT. SIMILARLY, THE AO HAS MADE ADDITIONS TOWARDS INTEREST PAID ON UNSECURED L OANS TAKEN FROM ABOVE CONCERNS ON THE GROUND THAT SINCE, TRANS ACTION BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE PROVED AS BOGUS ACCOMMODATI ON ENTRIES, ANY INTEREST PAID ON SUCH LOANS IS ALSO BO GUS IN NATURE. THEREFORE, THE SAME IS DISALLOWED AND ADDED BACK TO THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. LIKEWISE, THE LD. AO HAS MA DE ADDITION OF RS.20,20,000/- TOWARDS POSSIBLE COMMISSION PAID BY THE ASSESSEE TO OBTAIN UNSECURED LOANS ENTRIES OBTAINED FROM SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. AS REGARDS PURCHASES FROM M/S ANKI T ENTEPRISES AND M/S AKASH INTERNATIONAL TOTALLING TO RS. 90,81,012/-, THE AO OBSERVED THAT SINCE THE PRIMARY ONUS WAS NOT ESTABLISHED BY THE ASSESSEE, THE TOTAL PURCHASE S FROM ABOVE PARTIES IS TREATED AS BOGUS AND ACCORDINGLY, MADE A DDITIONS 11 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. TOWARDS PURCHASES FROM ABOVE ENTITIES TO THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. THE RELEVANT FINDINGS OF THE AO IS RE PRODUCED AS UNDER:- FROM THE CASE LAWS CITED ABOVE AND THE DISCUSSION ON EVIDENCES / FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION WING IN THE PRECEDING PARAS , THE PRIMARY ONUS WAS AND IS ON THE ASSESSEE TO ESTABLISH THE GENUINENESS OF THE LO ANS TAKEN BY IT IN WHICH IT HAS MISERABLY FAILED. IT IS EVIDENT THAT ON PERUSAL OF THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY, THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE INVESTIGATION WING OF THE DEPARTMENT ,MUMBAI, REGARDING THE BILLERS NAME AND AMOUNTS ARE MATCHED IN-TOTE AND VERBATIM. HENCE THE ASSESSEE'S ARGUMENT ON THIS LACKS ANY MERIT AND DESERVES TO BE REJECTED. THERE IS A SPECIFIC FINDING THE ABOVE MENTIONED PAR TIES HAD ISSUED FALSE BILLS WITHOUT DELIVERY OF GOODS UNEARTHED BY THE INDEPEND ENT ENQUIRIES CONDUCTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE DGIT (MV), MUMBAI. SUCH CRUCIA L FINDINGS BASED ON CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCES UNEARTHED DURING SEARCH NEG ATE THE CONTENTION OF THE ASSESSEE. THUS, UNDISPUTED FACT IS THAT THE PURCHAS ES CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN MADE FROM THESE PARTIES REMAINED UNVERIFIED. IN FAC T, SELF- INTEREST TALKS IN ALL SORTS OF TONGUES AND PLOYS ALL SORTS OF ROLES. THE INDIFFERENCE OF NOT PRODUCING THE PARTY WHICH ISSUED THE BILL IS INDICATIVE OF TH E TRUTH. THE REVENUE IS NOT DOUBTING ALL THE PURCHASES BUT DOUBTING ONLY THOSE PURCHASES FOR WHICH THE GENUINENESS COULD NOT BE PROVED. THE ASSESSEE IN ITS REPLY HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO GIVE A SATISFACTORY REPLY TO THE STAND TAKEN BY THE DEPARTMENT. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT COMMENTED ON THE ENTIRE MODUS OPERANDI ADMITTED BY THE PARTIES CONCE RNED. THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTIONS AND THEIR CONTROLLING KEY PERSONS HAVE CATEGORICALLY ADMITTED BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF PROVIDING ONLY BOGUS AND A CCOMMODATION ENTRIES FOR A COMMISSION TO THEIR CLIENTS. THE STATEMENTS WERE GIVEN UNDER OATH UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT. THE EVIDENCES GATHERED CLEARLY PROV ED THAT THESE PARTIES HAVE ONLY PROVIDED ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES FOR A CONS IDERATION/COMMISSION TO THE WILLING PARTIES. WHEN ENTIRE MODUS OPERANDI OF THESE ENTITIES IS THAT OF ONLY PROVIDING BOGUS AND ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES IN THE BO OKS AND IN FACT THE ACTUAL PURPOSE OF TRANSACTIONS IS THAT OF TAX AVOID ANCE AND INTRODUCTION OF UNACCOUNTED MONEY IN TO BOOKS, THERE IS NO SPECIFIC NEED TO MENTION EACH AND EVERY NAME OF THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTIONS I N THE STATEMENT ITSELF. THE SAME CAN BE EXTRACTED FROM THE BOOKS/DOCUMENTS MAIN TAINED BY SUCH ENTRY PROVIDERS. IT IS EVIDENT THAT ON PERUSAL OF THE BOOKS OF ACCOU NTS OF THE ASSESSEE, THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE INVESTIGATION WING OF THE DEPORTMENT ,MUMBAI, REGARDING THE BILLERS NAME AND AMOUNTS ARE MATCHED IN-TOTO AND VERBATIM. HENCE THE ASSESSEE'S ARGUMENT ON THIS LACKS ANY MER IT AND DESERVES TO BE REJECTED. FURTHER, RECKONING THE MODUS OPERANDI ENUNCIATED AB OVE, DETAILS AVAILABLE ON RECORD AND FINDINGS ON RECORD, IT IS NOT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND THE MANNER IN WHICH THE WHOLE TRANSACTION OF BOGUS LOANS HAVE TAK EN PLACE. THE LOGICAL COROLLARY THE ABOVE FACT LEADS TO THE CONCLUSION TH AT ACCOMMODATION ENTRY FOR 12 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. LOANS ARE TAKEN BY INVESTING THE ASSESSEE'S OWN UNA CCOUNTED CASH FOR WHICH THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT OFFERED ANY EXPLANATION REGARD ING ITS NATURE AND SOURCE. IN VIEW OF THE ASSESSEE'S FAILURE TO FURNISH PLAUSI BLE EXPLANATION WITH COGENT EVIDENCES, UNEXPLAINED LOANS AMOUNTING TO TO FURNIS H PLAUSIBLE EXPLANATION WITH COGENT EVIDENCES, UNEXPLAINED LOANS AMOUNTING TO RS. 10,45,00,000/- (M/S. MERIDIAN JEWELLERY PVT. LTD RS. 1,50,00,000/- , M/S ROSE GEMS RS. 2,45,00,000H M/S SANKHALA EXPORTS RS. 70,00,000/-, M/S LITTLE DIAM RS. 40,00,000/-, M/S MOULI GEMS RS. 2,00,00,000/-, M/S ROSE IMPEX RS. 3,00,00,000/-,M/S NICE DIAMONDS RS.40,00,0000/- ) T AKEN DURING THE YEAR IN RESPECT OF WHICH ASSESSEE HAS SOUGHT ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES IS DISALLOWED AND BROUGHT TO TAX. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ALSO HELD THA T INACCURATE PARTICULARS OF INCOME HAS BEEN FILED TO CONCEAL INCOME CHARGEABLE TO TAX AND PENALTY U/S.271(1)(C) IS SEPARATELY INITIATED. SINCE THE UNSECURED LOANS IN QUESTION HAVE BEEN HEL D TO BE MERE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES I.E. BOGUS IN VIEW OF THE CAT EGORICAL FINDINGS DISCUSSED ABOVE, THE INTEREST PAID ON THE SAME IS ALSO NOT AN ALLOWABLE EXPENSES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF INCOME TAX ACT. ACCORDINGLY THE I NTEREST DEBITED ON THIS ACCOUNT AMOUNTING TO RS. 98,30,414/- PAID TO PARTIE S BELONGING TO SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP (WHICH INCLUDES INTEREST PAID TO M/S. MARIDIAN JEWELLERY PVT. LTD, M/S ROSE GEMS, M/S SANKHALA EXPORTS, M/S LITTLE DIAM, M/S MOULI GEMS M/S ROSE IMPEX FOR THE LOAN TAKEN DURING THE F .Y.2012-13 AND OLD LOANS FROM M/S MAHALAXMI GEMS PVT. LTD,M/S LOOK AT ME REAL PVT. LTD, M/S A- 2 JEWELS) IS ALSO DISALLOWED AND ADDED BACK TO THE TOTAL INCOME. FURTHER, THE COMMISSION ELEMENT FOR PROCURING THE A CCOMMODATION BILLS IS ALSO TO BE CONSIDERED AND THE SAME NEED TO BE WORKED OUT AND ADDED BACK. IT IS KNOWN PRACTICE THAT ACCOMMODATION BILLS FOR BOGUS L OANS ARE OBTAINED BY GIVING A COMMISSION. AS DISCUSSED ABOVE IN THE PREC EDING PARA AND ADMITTED BY SHRI. BHANWARLAL JAIN, IN HIS STATEMENT , THE CO MMISSION RECEIVED BY HIM ON BOGUS LOAN ENTRY IS 0.2% PER MONTH I.E. 20 PAISE PE R RS. 100/-. IN THIS CASE, SINCE THERE IS NO ACTUAL LOAN, THE CO MMISSION PAID IS ALSO NOT ALLOWABLE AND IS BROUGHT TO TAX AND THE PERCENTAGE OF COMMISSION PAID IS TAKEN @ 0.2% PER MONTH. THUS COMMISSION PAID ON THE SE BOGUS LOANS -@ 0.2% ON PROPORTIONATE BASIS CONSIDERING THE PERIOD AMOUNTING TO RS. 20,20,000/-IS ALSO DISALLOW ED. ) SIMILARLY WITH REGARD TO THE PURCHASES FROM M/S. AN IKET ENTERPRISES OF RS. 63,17,640/- & FROM M/S. AKASH INTERNATIONAL OF RS. 27,63,372/- TOTALLING TO RS. 90,81,012/-, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE PRIMARY ONUS WAS/ IS ON THE ASSESSEE TO ESTABLISH THE GENUINENESS OF THE PURCHASE CLAIMED B Y IT IN WHICH THE ASSESSEE HAS MISERABLY FAILED. AS SUCH, AFTER CAREFULLY GOIN G THROUGH THE LEGAL INSTANCES DISCUSSED ABOVE ON THIS ISSUE, THE PURCHASE SHOWN F ROM THE ABOVE PARTY NAMELY M/S. ANIKET ENTERPRISES OF RS. 63,17,640/- & FROM M/ S. AKASH INTERNATIONAL OF RS. 27,63,372/- TOTALLING TO RS. 9 0,81,012/-, IS HELD TO BE BOGUS.THE SAME THEREFORE, IS BROUGHT TO TAX AND ADD ED TO THE TOTAL INCOME DECLARED. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ALSO HELD THAT INACCURA TE PARTICULARS OF INCOME HAS BEEN FLIED TO CONCEAL INCOME CHARGEABLE TO TAX AND PENALTY U/S. 271(1)(C) OF THE I.T. ACT IS SEPARATELY. 13 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 7. AGGRIEVED BY THE ASSESSMENT ORDER, THE ASSESSEE PREFERRED AN APPEAL BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A). BEFORE THE LD. CIT (A), THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED ELABORATE WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE ISSUE, WHICH HAS BEEN REPRODUCED AT PARA-11 ON PAGES 11 TO 17 OF THE LD. CIT(A)S ORDER. THE SUM AND SUBSTANCE OF ARGUME NTS OF THE ASSESSEE BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A) ARE THAT THE AO HAS MADE ADDITION TOWARDS UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM VARIOUS COMPANIES BELONGING TO MR. BHANWARLAL JAIN ONLY ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH IN CASE OF BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP OF COMPANIES WITHOUT BRINGIN G ON RECORD ANY FURTHER EVIDENCES TO LINK THOSE EVIDENC ES TO UNSECURED LOANS ENTRIES FOUND IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOU NT OF THE ASSESSEE SO AS TO TREAT THE SAID LOANS ARE ACCOMMOD ATION ENTRIES. THE ASSESSEE FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE AO COMPLETELY WENT WRONG TO REACH TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE ASSE SSEE IS ONE OF THE BENEFICIARIES OF ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES OF UN SECURED LOANS PROVIDED BY VARIOUS COMPANIES OF BHANWARLAL J AIN, WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACT THAT SAID LOANS HAVE BEEN TAKEN UNDER NORMAL BUSINESS CIRCUMSTANCES AND ALSO THESE LOANS ARE TAKEN ON NORMAL RATE OF INTEREST. THE ASSESSEE HAS PAID INTEREST AFTER DEDUCTING NECESSARY TDS APPLICABLE AS PER LAW . THESE 14 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. LOANS WERE REPAID IN NEXT FINANCIAL YEAR. ALL THESE EVIDENCES WERE PART OF ASSESSMENT RECORD. DURING THE COURSE O F SURVEY, IN GROUP CASES OF M/S POONAM GROUP, NO CONTRARY EVIDEN CE WAS FOUND TO LINK EVIDENCES GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH IN CASE OF BHANWARLAL JAIN TO THE CREDITS FOUND IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF THE ASSESSEE EXCEPT STATING THAT MR. BH ANWARLAL JAIN HAS ADMITTED IN HIS STATEMENT THAT HE IS INVOL VED IN PROVIDING BOGUS ENTRIES AND THE ASSESSEE IS ONE OF THE BENEFICIARY OF SUCH BOGUS ENTRIES. SIMILARLY, THE A O HAS MADE ADDITION TOWARDS PURCHASE WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE E XPLANATION FURNISHED BY THE ASSESSEE TO JUSTIFY THOSE PURCHASE S IN LIGHT OF VARIOUS EVIDENCES. 8. THE LD. CIT(A), AFTER CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSION S OF THE ASSESSEE AND ALSO BY RELIED UPON PLETHORA OF JUDICI AL PRECEDENTS, INCLUDING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE S UPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF SUMATI DAYAL (1995) 214 ITR 80 1(SC) HELD THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO PROVE THE IDENTITY, CREDITWORTHINESS AND GENUINENESS OF UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM CONCERNS OF BHANWARLAL JAIN AND THUS, THE AO H AS RIGHTLY MADE ADDITIONS TOWARDS UNSECURED LOANS U/S 68 OF TH E ACT. THE LD. CIT(A) HAS DISCUSSED THE ISSUE EXTENSIVELY IN H IS ORDER IN 15 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. LIGHT OF FACTS BROUGHT OUT BY THE AO IN HIS ASSESSM ENT ORDER. THE LD. CIT(A) ALSO DELIBERATED UPON THE EVIDENCES GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH IN CASE OF BHANWARLAL J AIN AND ALSO SURVEY IN THE CASE OF POONAM GROUP TO COME TO CONCL USION THAT TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE ASSESSEE AND COMPANIES BEL ONGING TO BHANWARLAL JAIN ARE BOGUS TRANSACTIONS WHICH ARE FA ILED THE TEST OF GENUINENESS IN LIGHT OF PROVISIONS OF SECTI ON 68 OF THE ACT. THE LD. CIT(A) HEAVILY RELIED UPON THE STATEM ENT OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN GIVEN DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH T O COME TO CONCLUSION THAT WHEN THE PERSON WHO GAVE LOAN ADMIT TED THE FACT THAT THESE ENTRIES ARE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES, NO MATTER WHATEVER DETAILS HAVE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE WHICH ARE ONLY SELF SERVING DOCUMENTS TO CIRCUMVENT THE FINDINGS OF THE FACT RECORDED BY THE AO DURING THE COURSE OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, THEREFORE, THE SAME CANNOT BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCES IN ORDER TO GIVE CLEAN CHIT TO THE ASSESS EE. ACCORDINGLY, THE LD. CIT(A) HAS CONFIRMED ADDITIONS MADE BY THE AO TOWARDS UNSECURED LOAN TAKEN FROM COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND OPERATED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. SI MILARLY, THE LD. CIT(A) HAS CONFIRMED ADDITIONS MADE BY THE AO T OWARDS INTEREST DEBITED IN THE PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT IN TH E NAME OF 16 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. VARIOUS PARTIES BELONGING TO THE BHANWARLAL JAIN GR OUP ON THE GROUND THAT ONCE UNSECURED LOANS HAVE BEEN TREATED AS BOGUS ENTRIES, CORRESPONDING INTEREST PAYMENT ON SUCH LOA N ALSO NEEDS TO BE TREATED AS BOGUS, ACCORDINGLY THERE IS NO ERROR IN THE FINDINGS OF THE AO WHILE MAKING ADDITIONS TOWAR DS INTEREST. LIKEWISE, THE LD. CIT(A) CONFIRMED THE ADDITIONS MA DE BY THE AO TOWARDS 0.2% COMMISSION EXPENDITURE INCURRED BY THE ASSESSEE TO OBTAIN UNSECURED LOANS FROM THE COMPANI ES CONTROLLED AND MANAGED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN ON T HE GROUND THAT SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN HAS CONSISTENTLY STATED I N HIS STATEMENT, DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH THAT HE HAD CHARGED COMMISSION AT TWO PAISE FOR RS.100 PER TRANSACTION ON LOAN AMOUNT AND THIS COMMISSION HAS NOT BEEN RECORDED IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF THE CONCERNS. INSOFAR AS, PUR CHASES FROM FIRMS CONTROLLED BY BHANWARLAL JAIN, THE LD. CIT(A) BY FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CA SE OF N. K. PROTEINS LTD. IN SLP 759 OF 2017, DATED 16/01/2017 AFFIRMED THE FINDINGS OF THE LD. AO IN CONFIRMING ALLEGED BO GUS PURCHASES ON THE GROUND THAT WHEN NOTICES U/S 133(6 ) WERE ISSUED TO THOSE PARTIES, ALL NOTICES WERE RETURNED BACK WITH REMARK NOT KNOWN. FURTHER, WHEN THE AO DEPUTED I NSPECTOR 17 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. ATTACHED TO THE OFFICE FOR VERIFICATION, THE INSPEC TOR GAVE REPORT THAT NONE OF THE PARTIES WERE AVAILABLE IN THE GIVE N ADDRESS. WHEN THE EVIDENCES GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF AS SESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, CLEARLY PROVED THE FACT THAT THOSE PAR TIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN THE GIVEN ADDRESS, THEN WHATEVER DOCUM ENTS WERE FURNISHED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE SELF-SERVING DOCUMENT S WHICH CANNOT BE GIVEN MUCH IMPORTANCE, THEREFORE, THERE I S NO ERROR IN THE FINDINGS OF THE AO IN MAKING ADDITION TOWARD S BOGUS PURCHASES. THE RELEVANT FINDINGS OF THE LD. CIT(A ) ARE AS UNDER:- 12.116 THE APPELLANT HAS RELIED ON VARIOUS JUDICIA L PRONOUNCEMENTS, DURING THE COURSE OF THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS. HOWEVER, MOST OF THE CASE LAWS RELIED UPON BY THE A PPELLANT DOESN'T RELATE TO ENTRY OPERATOR AND HENCE ARE DISTINGUISHA BLE ON FACTS, WHICH HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED ABOVE IN AN ELABORATE MAN NER. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE ARE VARIOUS BINDING PRECEDENTS OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURTS IN FAVOUR OF THE REVEN UE, WHICH HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED ABOVE, IN DETAILS IN THIS APPEL LATE ORDER. 12.117 IN THESE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN VIE W OF THE VARIOUS JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS DISCUSSED ABOVE, TH E DOCUMENTATION FILED BY THE APPELLANT LIKE CONFIRMAT ION, FINANCIALS, BANK STATEMENTS, INCOME-TAX RETURNS ETC. OF THE ENT RY PROVIDING CONCERNS OF THE BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP HAVE NO EVIDE NTIARY VALUE. THE I.T. DEPARTMENT HAS ALREADY HELD THAT THE VARIO US CONCERNS OF BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP ARE JUST DUMMY CONCERNS, WHICH HAVE BEEN FLOATED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ACCOMMODA TION ENTRIES. 12.118 TO SUM UP, THE APPELLANT HAS FAILED TO ESTA BLISH THE TRUE IDENTITY, CREDITWORTHINESS AND GENUINENESS OF THE UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM THE CONCERNS OF BHANWARLAL JAIN AND THUS, HAS RIGHTLY BEEN ADDED BACK U/S 68 OF THE ACT, BEING ACC OMMODATION 18 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. ENTRIES TAKEN FROM THE BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP. ACCORDI NGLY, IT IS HELD THAT THE UNEXPLAINED LOANS AMOUNTING TO RS. 10, 45,00,0007- (M/S. MERIDIAN JEWELLERY PVT. LTD RS. 1,50,00,0007- M /S. ROSE GEMS RS. 2,45,00,000/-, M/S SANKHALA EXPORTS RS. 70, 00,000/-, M/S. LITTLE DIAM RS. 40,00,000/-, M/S. MOULI GEMS RS. 2,00,00,000/-, M/S ROSE IMPEX RS. 3,00,00,000/-, M/S . NICE DIAMONDS RS. 40,00,000/-) TAKEN DURING THE YEAR UNDE R CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN RIGHTLY TAXED BY THE A.O. U/S 68 OF THE ACT, BEING PROVEN ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES. 12.119 I N VIEW OF THE ABOVE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCE S OF THE CASE, AS ALSO THE VARIOUS JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS, THE GROUND NO. 3 OF THE PRESENT APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. DECISION ON GROUND NO. 4 13.0 I HAVE CONSIDERED THE FACTS OF THE CASE, SUBM ISSIONS OF THE APPELLANT, THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE AO CONTAINED IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AND THE OTHER MATERIALS ON RECORD ON THIS ISS UE. 13.1 ON THIS ISSUE, IT MAY BE NOTED THAT I HAVE CO NFIRMED THE ADDITION MADE BY THE A.O. ON ACCOUNT OF UNSECURED LO ANS, WHICH HAVE BEEN HELD TO BE BOGUS AND MERE ACCOMMODATION E NTRIES. SINCE, THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF LOAN HAS BEEN HELD T O BE BOGUS IN NATURE, THE INTEREST PAID / PAYABLE ON THE SAME ALS O NEEDS TO BE DISALLOWED. 13.2 IT IS ALSO BROUGHT ON RECORD THAT A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE SEIZED MATERIAL FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE SEAR CH OPERATION ON THE BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP HAS REVEALED THAT EVEN THE INTEREST PORTION PAID THROUGH CHEQUE AND DULY RECORDED IN TH E BOOKS OF ACCOUNT AT BOTH THE ENDS, HAS ALSO BEEN SETTLED IN CASH. THUS, AGAINST THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST PAID BY THE BORROWER BY CHEQUE / RTGS, AN EQUIVALENT AMOUNT OF UNACCOUNTED CASH IS RE CEIVED BACK BY THE BORROWER FROM THE RESPECTIVE BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP CONCERN. 13.3 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HELD THAT THE INTEREST DEBI TED IN THE P&L ACCOUNT AMOUNTING TO RS. 98,30,414/- IN THE NAME OF VARIOUS PARTIES BELONGING TO THE BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP, ON THE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES OF LOANS HAS BEEN RIGHTLY DIS ALLOWED BY THE A.O. AND IS UPHELD. HENCE, THE GROUND NO. 4 OF THE P RESENT APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. 14.13 THUS, THE APPLICATION OF A RATE OF 20 PAISA PER RS. 100 PER MONTH, AS COMMISSION ON ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES O F LOANS / ADVANCES BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS DULY CORROBORAT ED BY THE SEIZED MATERIAL FOUND IN THE CASE OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. IT IS 19 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. CLEAR FROM THE MATERIAL ON RECORD THAT SHRI BHANWARL AL JAIN HAS CHARGED COMMISSION @ 0.2% PER MONTH IN CASH ON THE OUTSTANDING AMOUNT OF THE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES, FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD FOR WHICH SUCH ENTRY HAS REMAINED OUTSTANDING. IT NEEDS TO BE EMPHASIZED HERE THAT IT IS NOT THE CASE THAT SHRI B HANWARLAL JAIN HAS CHARGED COMMISSION ONLY AT THE TIME OF GIVING O F THE ACCOMMODATION ENTRY OF LOAN. THE FACT IS THAT SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN HAS CHARGED COMMISSION ON A REGULAR MONTHLY BASIS F OR THE ENTIRE PERIOD FOR WHICH THE LOAN ENTRY HAS REMAINED OUTSTA NDING WITH THE APPELLANT. 14.14 NEEDLESS TO EMPHASIZE HERE THAT THE ADDITIO N MADE BY THE A.O. ON ACCOUNT OF UNACCOUNTED COMMISSION EXPENS ES IS NOT A NOTIONAL DISALLOWANCE OR ADDITION, BUT IS BASED ON VOLUMINOUS INCRIMINATING SEIZED MATERIAL FOUND DURING THE COUR SE OF THE SEARCH OPERATION ON SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. DURING THE COURSE OF THE SEARCH OPERATION ON SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN, COMPLETE LEDGER A CCOUNT OF COMMISSION RECEIVED FROM EACH AND EVERY PARTY HAS B EEN RECORDED IN THE PARALLEL BOOKS OF ACCOUNT FOUND ON THE PEN-D RIVE. SUCH COMMISSION ACCOUNTS HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED IN DETAILS ABOVE AND HENCE THE SAME DISCUSSION IS NOT REPEATED HERE AGAIN. 14.15 IN THESE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, THERE IS NO REASON TO INTERFERE WITH THE ADDITION MADE BY THE A.O. IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ON ACCOUNT OF UNACCOUNTED COMMISSION EXPENSES INCURRED IN CASH BY THE APPELLANT ON THE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES O F LOANS AND THE SAME STANDS CONFIRMED IN ENTIRETY. DECISION ON GROUND NO. 6: 18.0 I HAVE CONSIDERED THE FACTS OF THE CASE, SUB MISSIONS OF THE APPELLANT, THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE AO CONTAINED IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AND THE OTHER MATERIALS ON RECORD ON THIS ISSUE. 18.1 DURING THE COURSE OF SURVEY ACTION ON THE POO NAM GROUP IT WAS FOUND THAT ELEVEN CONCERNS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF PROVIDING FICTITIOUS PURCHASE BILLS, HAVE IN FACT P ROVIDED BOGUS PURCHASE ENTRIES TO THE VARIOUS CONCERNS OF POONAM G ROUP. THESE 11 ENTRY OPERATING CONCERNS WERE FOUND TO BE MANAGE D AND CONTROLLED BY FOUR PERSONS NAMELY, SHRI TRILOK JAIN , SHRI KANAKRAJ PAREEKH, SHRI JITENDRA C. JAIN AND SHRI. MANOJ C. JA IN. DURING THE COURSE OF THE SURVEY ACTION, STATEMENTS WERE RECORD ED OF THE PERSONS MANAGING THE ENTRY OPERATING CONCERNS. THE RELEVANT EXTRACTS OF STATEMENT OF SHRI JITENDRA CHAMPALAL JA IN RECORDED ON 16 LH OCTOBER 2014 ARE REPRODUCED HEREUNDER:- 20 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 'Q10. WERE THE ABOVE RTGS PAYMENTS MADE TO YOU FOR ANY MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY YOU TO THE POONAM GROUP OF COM PANIES? ANS: THE RTGS WAS DONE AGAINST ANY MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY ME. IN FACT, I AM A COMMISSION AGENT AND NOT INVOLVED IN A NY SUPPLY OF ANY MATERIAL TO ANY COMPANY. I JUST RECEIVED THE RTGS AM OUNTS IN MY ACCOUNTS AND REMIT THE SAME TO THE ACCOUNTS WHICH T HE ABOVE MENTIONED AGENTS DIRECT ME TO DO SO. THERE HAS BEEN NO SUPPLY OF ANY MATERIAL OR SERVICES TO THE POONAM GROUP BY ME WHATSOEVER. Q.11. DO YOU HAVE A TIN NO? HAVE YOU BEEN REGISTERE D IN THE SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT? ANS: I DO NOT HAVE ANY TIN NO. NOR HAVE I BEEN REGIS TERED IN THE SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT. Q.14. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE TRANSACTIONS WHICH YOU HAVE CARRIED OUT WITH M/S. POONAM GROUP OF COMPANIES. ANS: I ONLY DO THE TRANSACTIONS IN THE POONAM GROUP AS DIRECTED BY MY BROKER, KANAKBHAI. I DO NOT CARRY OUT ANY GENUIN E BUSINESS TRANSACTION WITH THE POONAM GROUP OF COMPANIES. I ON LY GIVE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES TO THE POONAM GROUP AND VARIO US OTHER GROUPS WHICH ARE REFLECTED IN MY BANK ACCOUNTS. Q.16: PLEASE STATE WHEN YOU ARE DOING THE BUSINESS O F BILL/CHEQUE DISCOUNTING FOR M/S POONAM GROUP? ANS: I AM DOING THE BUSINESS OF CHEQUE DISCOUNTING F OR M/S POONAM GROUP FOR THE LAST 5-6 YEARS. 18.2 IN THE ABOVE STATEMENT, SHRI JITENDRA CHAMPA LAL JAIN HAS CLEARLY ADMITTED THAT HE IS JUST A COMMISSION A GENT AND NO MATERIAL HAS BEEN SUPPLIED TO THE CONCERNS OF POONA M GROUP. IT HAS BEEN FURTHER STATED BY HIM THAT HE HAS ONLY GIV EN ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES TO THE POONAM GROUP. FURTHER, SHRI JITENDRA CHAMPALAL JAIN HAS STATED THAT ALL THE ENT RIES REFLECTED IN THE BANK ACCOUNT ARE JUST ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES. 18.3 THE APPELLANT HAS TAKEN ACCOMMODATION ENTRY FOR PURCHASE FROM VARIOUS BOGUS BILLERS I.E. M/S. ANIKET ENTERPRISES OF RS. 63,17,640/- & FROM M/S. AKASH INTERNATIONAL OF RS. 2 7,63,3 72/- AND THUS ARE NOT GENUINE TRANSACTIONS. 18.4 I HAVE NOTED THAT THE INVESTIGATION WING, MUMB AI HAS UNAMBIGUOUSLY STATED THAT THE IMPUGNED PURCHASES AR E JUST ENTRIES 21 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. PROVIDED BY BOGUS BILLERS. FURTHER, THE A.O. HAS ISSU ED NOTICES U/S. 133(6) OF THE ACT TO THE VARIOUS PARTIES TO VERIFY T HEIR GENUINENESS. THESE NOTICES HAVE BEEN RETURNED BACK UNSERVED BY T HE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH REMARKS 'NOT KNOWN'. IN THESE CIRC UMSTANCES, AN INSPECTOR ATTACHED TO THE A.O. WAS DEPUTED TO MAK E FURTHER LOCAL ENQUIRIES WITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE-MENTIONED PARTIE S. THE LOCAL ENQUIRIES CONDUCTED BY THE INSPECTOR HAVE ALSO REVE ALED THAT NO SUCH PARTY / FIRM / COMPANYIS IN EXISTENCE AT THE A DDRESS GIVEN BY THE APPELLANT. 18.5 DURING THE COURSE OF THE APPELLATE PROCEEDIN GS, NO DETAILS OF THE STOCK REGISTER WERE FILED. FURTHER, T HERE IS NO RECORD EVIDENCING UTILIZATION OF THE SO CALLED BOGUS PURCH ASES. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT IS CLEAR THAT SUCH BOGUS PURCHASE S HAVE GONE TO REDUCE THE PROFITS OF THE APPELLANT BY THAT AMOUNT. IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, THE ENTIRE 100 % OF THE BOGUS PURCHASES DISALLOWED BY THE A.O. NEEDS TO BE CONFIRM ED .IN THIS REGARD, RELIANCE IS PLACED ON THE DECISION OF HON'B LE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF NK PROTEINS LTD. IN SLP 759 OF 2 017, DATED 16- 01-2017, WHEREIN IT WAS HELD THAT ONCE IT IS PROVED THAT THE PURCHASES ARE BOGUS, THEN THE ADDITION SHOULD BE MA DE FOR THE ENTIRE PURCHASES AND NOT FOR PROFIT ELEMENT EMBEDDE D IN SUCH PURCHASES. 18.6 THE VARIOUS JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS IN RELAT ION TO THE ENTRY OPERATOR HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED IN DETAI LS IN THE EARLIER PART OF THIS APPELLATE ORDER AND ARE NOT REPEATED H ERE AGAIN FOR THE SAKE OF BREVITY. 18.7 THUS, THE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES OF PURCHASES FROM M/S. ANIKET ENTERPRISES OF RS. 63.17.640/- & M/S. AKASH INTERNATIONAL OF RS. 27,63,372/-TOTALING TO RS. 90,81 ,012/- HAS BEEN RIGHTLY DISALLOWED BY THE A.O. AND ARE ACCORDINGLY C ONFIRMED. ACCORDINGLY, THIS GROUND OF APPEAL NO. 6 OF THE APPEL LANT IS DISMISSED. 9. THE FIRST ISSUE THAT CAME UP FOR OUR CONSIDERAT ION FROM ASSESSEES APPEAL IS ADDITIONS TOWARDS UNSECUR ED LOANS OF RS.10,45,00,000/- TAKEN FROM COMPANIES CONTROLLED A ND OPERATED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN AND HIS ASSOCIATES . THE LD. AR FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT LD. CIT(A) WAS E RRED IN 22 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. CONFIRMING ADDITIONS MADE BY THE AO TOWARDS UNSECUR ED LOAN TAKEN FROM COMPANIES BELONGING TO BHANWARLAL JAIN W ITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS PROVED ALL INGREDIENTS PROVIDED U/S 68 OF THE ACT. THE LD. AR FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED ENORMOUS DOCU MENTS IN ORDER TO PROVE THE IDENTITY, CREDITWORTHINESS OF TH E PARTIES AND GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS. IN FACT, THE AO NEVER DISPUTED IDENTITY OF LOAN CREDITORS. THE AO HAS CATEGORICALL Y ADMITTED THAT ASSESSEE HAS FILED VARIOUS DOCUMENTS INCLUDING CONFIRMATION LETTER, PAN, ITR ACKNOWLEDGMENT ALONG WITH FINANCIAL STATEMENT, BANK STATEMENT OF LOAN CREDITO RS AND ALSO AFFIDAVIT FROM DIRECTOR/PARTNER/PROPRIETOR OF THOSE COMPANIES/FIRMS TO PROVE THE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES. T HE LD. AR FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE ALSO FILED VARI OUS DETAILS IN ORDER TO PROVE GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS IN THE B ACKDROP OF ADMISSION OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN IN HIS STATEMENT RECORDED U/S 132(4) OF THE ACT AND SUBMITTED THAT SHRI BHANW ARLAL JAIN HAS FILED AN AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX AUTHOR ITIES ALONG WITH A LETTER RETRACTING HIS STATEMENT GIVEN U/S 13 2(4) OF THE ACT, THEREFORE, WHEN THE PERSON WHO GAVE THE STATEM ENT HAS 23 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. RETRACTED HIS STATEMENT WITH AN AFFIDAVIT, THEN THE STATEMENT RECORDED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH DOES NOT HAVE ANY EVIDENTIARY VALUE. THEREFORE, THE SAME CANNOT BE CO NSIDERED AS SACROSANCT TO COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE TRANS ACTIONS WERE BOGUS IN NATURE. THE LD. AR FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE SOLE BASIS FOR THE AO TO MAKE ADDITIONS TOWARDS UNS ECURED LOANS IS A STATEMENT OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN, WHICH WAS SUBSEQUENTLY RETRACTED BY HIM. FURTHER, IN SPITE OF SPECIFIC REQUEST, THE AO DECLINED TO PROVIDE THE STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE RELIED UPON AND ALSO DECLINED TO GIVE OPPORTUNITY T O CROSS EXAMINE THE PARTIES. THE LD. AR FURTHER SUBMITTED T HAT DURING THE COURSE OF SURVEY IN THE GROUP CASES OF ASSESSEE , NO INCRIMINATING MATERIAL WAS FOUND TO LINK CREDITS FO UND IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT OF THE ASSESSEE AND ALSO TO EVIDEN CES COLLECTED FROM SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP CASES DURING THE SE ARCH. THE AO AS WELL AS THE LD. CIT(A) WERE GIVEN MUCH IMPORT ANCE TO THE MODUS OPERANDI AND EVIDENCE COLLECTED DURING THE SE ARCH IN THE CASE SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN IGNORING THE EVIDENCE S FILED BY THE ASSESSEE DURING THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS. TH EREFORE, WHEN THE ASSESSEE DISCHARGED INITIAL BURDEN BY FILI NG ENORMOUS DOCUMENTS TO PROVE THE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRA NSACTIONS, 24 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES, ADDITIONS COULD NO T BE MADE U/S 68 OF THE ACT, ONLY ON THE BASIS OF EVIDENCES C OLLECTED FROM THIRD PARTYS INFORMATION. IN THIS REGARD, HE RELIE D UPON VARIOUS JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS. THE CASE WAS RELIED UPON BY TH E ASSESSEE ARE REPRODUCED HEREUNDER:- I. CIT VS. GOA SPONGE AND POWER LTD (13/02/2012) TAX APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2012 (HIGH COURT-BOMBAY) II. CIT VS. CREATIVE WORLD TELE FILMS LTD (2011) 333 IT R 100 (BORN-HIGH COURT) III. CIT VS. LOVELY EXPORTS (P) LTD (2008) 216 CTR 195 ( SC) IV. CIT VS. STELLER INVESTMENT LTD (2001) 251 ITR 263 ( SC) (CIVIL APPEAL) V. CIT VS. NAV BHARAT DUOLEX LTD (2013) 35 TAXMANN.COM289 (ALL-HIGH COURT) VI. CIT VS. JAYDEE SECURITIES & FINANCE LTD (2013) 32 TAXMANN.COM91 (ALL-HIGH COURT) VII. ACIT VS. VENKATESHWARLSPAT PVT LTD (2009) 319 ITR 3 93 (CHHATISGARH-HIGH COURT) VIII. MOD CREATIONS PVT LTD VS. /TO (2013) 354 ITR 282 (D EL- HIGH COURT) IX. CIT VS. AL ANAM AGRO FOODS (P.) LTD (2013) 38 TAXMANN.CORN 375 (ALL-HIGH COURT) X. CIT VS. DWARKADHISH INVESTMENT (P) LTD (2011) 330 I TR 298 (DEL-HIGH COURT) XI. CIT VS. NAMASTEY CHEMICALS PVT LTD (2013) 33 TAXMANN.COM271 (GUJ-HIGH COURT) XII. CIT VS. PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL LTD (2013) 356 ITR 65 (MP-HIGH COURT) 25 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. XIII. CIT VS. SHREE RAMA MULTI TECH LTD (2013) 34 TAXMANN.COM177 (GUJ-HC) XIV. CIT VS. NIKUNJ EXIMP ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD (2013) 35 TAXRNANN.COM384 (BOM) XV. CIT VS. SAMIR BIO- TECH PVT LTD (2010) 325 ITR 294 (DEL- HIGH COURT) 10. THE LD. DR ON THE OTHER HAND STRONGLY SUPPORTE D THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) AND SUBMITTED THAT THE AO A S WELL AS THE LD. CIT(A) BROUGHT OUT CLEAR FACTS TO THE EFFECT TH AT THE ASSESSEE IS ONE OF THE BENEFICIARIES OF ACCOMMODATION ENTRIE S PROVIDED BY BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP COMPANIES. THE ASSESSEE NEITH ER CONTROVERTED FINDINGS OF THE AO AS WELL AS THE LD. CIT(A) NOR FILED ANY VALID EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT UNSECURED LO ANS TAKEN FROM THE ABOVE COMPANIES ARE GENUINENESS TRANSACTIO NS. MERE FURNISHING CERTAIN PAPER DOCUMENTS INCLUDING BANK S TATEMENTS WOULD NOT SUFFICIENT ENOUGH TO COME OUT OF SHADOW O F PROVISIONS OF SECTION 68 OF THE ACT, WHEN THE EVIDE NCES COLLECTED DURING THE SEARCH AS WELL AS SURVEY CLEARLY SHOWS T HAT TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE NOT GENUINE TR ANSACTIONS, THEREFORE, THERE IS NO ERROR IN THE FINDINGS RECORD ED BY THE LOWER AUTHORITIES. ACCORDINGLY, ADDITIONS MADE BY THE AO SHOULD BE UPHELD. 26 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 11. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES, PERUSED THE MA TERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD AND GONE GROUND THROUGH THE ORD ERS OF AUTHORITIES BELOW. THE SOLITARY ISSUE THAT NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED UNDER GIVEN FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE IS WHETHER UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM CERTAIN COMPANIES CONTRO LLED AND MANAGED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN IS UNEXPLAINED CASH CREDIT, WHICH COMES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 68 OF T HE ACT OR NOT. THE AO HAS MADE ADDITIONS OF RS.10,45,00,000/- TOWARDS UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM CERTAIN COMPANIES CONTRO LLED AND MANAGED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN U/S 68 OF THE ACT, ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO FILE NECESSA RY DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO PROVE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRANSACT IONS AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES. THE AO HAS EXTENSI VELY DISCUSSED THE ISSUE IN HIS ASSESSMENT ORDER IN LIGH T OF FACTS GATHER DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH IN CASE OF BHANW ARLAL JAIN GROUP OF CASES AND SURVEY IN THE CASE OF ASSESSEES GROUP CONCERN. ACCORDINGLY, THE AO, OPINED THAT ALTHOUGH THE ASSESSEE HAS FURNISHED VARIOUS DOCUMENTS INCLUDING CONFIRMATIONS FROM THE LOAN CREDITORS AND THEIR ITR ACKNOWLEDGMENT, BUT FAILED TO PROVE THE GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES IN ORDER TO 27 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. COME OUT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 68 OF THE ACT. T HE AO FURTHER WAS OF THE OPINION THAT MERE FURNISHING CERTAIN PAP ER DOCUMENTS IS NOT SUFFICIENT ENOUGH IN LIGHT OF VARI OUS FACTS GATHERED BY THE DEPARTMENT DURING THE COURSE OF SEA RCH. THE AO FURTHER WAS OF THE OPINION THAT PAYMENT THROUGH PROPER BANKING CHANNEL AND INTEREST PAYMENT TO THOSE UNSEC URED LOANS IS NOT SACROSANCT BECAUSE ALL THESE SHELL COMPANIES/HAWALA OPERATORS WOULD KEEP NECESSARY PAP ER DOCUMENT IN ORDER TO GIVE COLOUR OF GENUINENESS TO THEIR TRANSACTIONS. THEREFORE, HE OPINED THAT THE TRANSAC TIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE FAILED TO PASS THE TEST OF GENUINENESS AND ACCORDINGLY MADE ADDITIONS U/S 68 OF THE ACT. 12. THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 68 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH THE CASES, WHERE ANY SUM FOUND CREDITED IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT OF THE ASSESSEE IN ANY FINANCIAL YEAR, AND THE ASSESSE E OFFERS NO EXPLANATION ABOUT THE NATURE AND SOURCE THEREOF OR EXPLANATION OFFERED BY THE ASSESSEE IS NOT IN THE OPINION OF TH E AO SATISFACTORY, THEN THE SUM SO CREDITED MAY BE CHARG ED TO INCOME TAX AS THE INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE OF THAT PR EVIOUS YEAR. A PLAIN READING OF SECTION 68 MAKES IT VERY CLEAR T HAT IN ORDER TO FIX ANY CREDIT WITHIN THE AMBIT OF SECTION 68 OF TH E ACT, THE AO 28 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. NEEDS TO EXAMINE THREE INGREDIENTS I.E. IDENTITY, G ENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES. I F THE ASSESSEE PROVES ALL INGREDIENTS PROVIDED U/S 68 OF THE ACT, THEN THE ONUS SHIFTS TO THE AO TO PROVE OTHERWISE. IN THIS LEGAL BACKGROUND, IF YOU EXAMINE THE IDENTITY OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIGHT O F FINDINGS RECORDED BY THE AO IN HIS ASSESSMENT ORDER, ONE HAS TO EXAMINE WHETHER THE ASSESSEE HAS DISCHARGED BURDEN CASTE UPON IT U/S 68 OF THE ACT IN RESPECT OF UNSECURED L OAN RECEIVED FROM CERTAIN COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND MANAGED BY SH RI BHANWARLAL JAIN. THE AO NEVER DISPUTED THE FACT THA T THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED VARIOUS EVIDENCES TO PROVE IDENT ITY OF THE LOAN CREDITORS. THE AO HAS CATEGORICALLY ADMITTED T HAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED VARIOUS DETAILS INCLUDING PAN CA RD, ITR ACKNOWLEDGMENT, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, BANK STATEMEN TS, CONFIRMATION LETTERS AND AFFIDAVIT FROM THE PARTIES FROM WHOM LOAN HAS BEEN TAKEN. THE AO HAS DISPUTED THE GENUIN ENESS OF TRANSACTIONS AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES. THE SOLE BASIS FOR THE AO TO DOUBT THE GENUINENESS OF TRANSA CTION IS SEARCH CONDUCTED IN THE CASES OF BHANWARLAL JAIN BY THE DGIT(INV.), MUMBAI UNIT, WHERE CERTAIN INCRIMINATIN G MATERIAL FOUND AND SEIZED AS PER WHICH BHANWARLAL JAIN AND H IS 29 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. ASSOCIATES WERE INVOLVED IN PROVIDING ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES AND THE ASSESSEE IS ONE OF THE BENEFICIARIES OF SUC H ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES. THE AO HAS TAKEN NOTE OF STA TEMENT RECORDED BY THE DEPARTMENT FROM SHRI BHANWARLAL JAI N AND HIS ASSOCIATES. THE AO HAS TAKEN NOTE TO SURVEY PROCEED INGS CONDUCTED IN THE GROUP CASES OF ASSESSEE AND STATEM ENT RECORDED FROM DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE ASSESS EE GROUP CASES. EXCEPT THIS, NO CONTRARY EVIDENCES HAS BEEN BROUGHT ON RECORD BY THE AO TO DISPROVE THE CLAIM OF THE ASSES SEE THAT THESE ARE GENUINE TRANSACTIONS AND UNSECURED LOAN T AKEN UNDER NORMAL BUSINESS CIRCUMSTANCES. THEREFORE, UND ER THESE FACTUAL MATRIX, WE HAVE TO EXAMINE WHETHER THE CRED ITS FOUND IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE HIT BY TH E PROVISIONS OF SECTION 68 OF THE ACT OR NOT. THE SOLE BASIS FOR THE AO TO MAKE ADDITIONS IS STATEMENT OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN RECORDED U/S 132(4) OF THE ACT, WHERE HE WAS ADMITTED THAT H E IS INVOLVED IN PROVIDING BOGUS UNSECURED LOANS ENTRIES TO VARIOUS BENEFICIARIES. THE STATEMENT GIVEN BY SHRI BHANWARL A JAIN HAS BEEN RETRACTED BY HIMSELF BY FILING AFFIDAVITS BEFO RE THE INCOME TAX AUTHORITIES. THEREFORE, THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE AO TO GO ONLY ON THE BASIS OF STATEMENT OF SHRI BHANWARLAL J AIN SO AS TO 30 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. TREAT UNSECURED LOAN TAKEN BY THE ASSESSEE FROM THE FIRM AND COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND MANAGED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN AND HIS ASSOCIATES. 13. HAVING SAID SO, LET US EXAMINE WHAT IS THE BAS IS FOR THE AO TO ARRIVE AT CONCLUSION THAT THE TRANSACTION S BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE NOT GENUINE AND WHICH ARE HIT BY TH E PROVISIONS OF SECTION 68 OF THE ACT. THE AO NEVER BROUGHT OUT ANY FURTHER FACTS TO LINK CREDITS FOUND IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT S OF THE ASSESSEE TO THE EVIDENCES FOUND DURING THE COURSE O F SEARCH IN THE CASE OF SHRI BHANWARAL JAIN EXCEPT STATEMENT OF SHRI BHANWARAL JAIN. EVEN DURING THE COURSE OF SURVEY IN GROUP CASES OF ASSESSEE, NO INCRIMINATING MATERIAL WAS FO UND WHICH CAN BE LINKED TO EVIDENCES COLLECTED DURING THE COU RSE OF SEARCH IN CASE OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. FURTHER, DURING TH E COURSE OF SURVEY IN ASSESSEES GROUP CASES, THE DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES HAVE CATEGORICALLY ADMITTED THAT THEY HAVE PERSONAL LY VISITED OFFICE OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN GROUP COMPANIES FOR ARRANGING LOANS. THE AO DID NOT CONTROVERT THIS FACT BY BRING ING ANY OTHER EVIDENCES. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE ASSESSEE HAS FILE D COMPLETE DETAILS INCLUDING CONFIRMATIONS FROM LOAN CREDITORS , THEIR PAN DETAILS, MASTER DATA, AFFIDAVIT FROM THE DIRECTORS/ PARTNERS/ 31 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. PROPRIETORS OF THOSE COMPANIES, INCOME TAX ACKNOWLE DGMENTS RECEIPTS ALONG WITH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, BANK STAT EMENTS OF LOAN CREDITORS IN ORDER TO PROVE THE IDENTITY, GENU INENESS OF TRANSACTION AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES.. W E, FURTHER, NOTED THAT ALL THESE LOANS HAVE BEEN TAKEN THROUGH PROPER BANKING CHANNELS. THE ASSESSEE HAS PAID INTEREST AF TER DEDUCTING APPLICABLE TDS AS PER THE LAW. THESE LOAN S HAVE BEEN REPAID DURING NEXT FINANCIAL YEAR. ALL THESE D OCUMENTS ARE PART OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS. THE AO HAS NEVER DI SPUTED THESE FACTUAL ASPECTS. THEREFORE, ONCE THE ASSESSEE HAS DISCHARGED ITS INITIAL BURDEN BY FILING NECESSARY E VIDENCES IN ORDER TO PROVE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTION S AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES, THEN THERE IS NO R EASON FOR AO TO SUSPECT THE TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES ONL Y ON THE GROUND THAT THE PERSON WHO GAVE UNSECURED LOAN HAD ADMITTED IN HIS STATEMENT U/S 132(4) OF THE ACT THAT THESE T RANSACTIONS ARE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES, MORE PARTICULARLY WHEN T HE PERSON WHO GAVE THE STATEMENT RETRACTED HIS STATEMENT BY F ILING AFFIDAVIT. FURTHER, THE AO FAILED TO CARRY OUT FURT HER ENQUIRIES IN LIGHT OF EVIDENCES GATHERED DURING THE COURSE OF SE ARCH AND SURVEY TO ESTABLISH THE FACT THAT IN FACT THESE TRA NSACTIONS ARE 32 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. NON-GENUINE, BUT MERELY RELIED UPON THE STATEMENT O F SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN TO MAKE ADDITIONS U/S 68 OF THE ACT . NO DOUBT, THE AO IS HAVING EVERY RIGHT TO SUSPECT THE TRANSAC TIONS BUT, THAT BY ITSELF WOULD NOT GIVE RISE AN OCCASION FOR THE AO TO MAKE ADDITIONS U/S 68 OF THE ACT, WHEN THE EVIDENCES FIL ED BY THE ASSESSEE CLEARLY PROVES THE FACTS THAT THESE TRANSA CTIONS WERE GENUINE TRANSACTIONS WHICH ARE UNDERTAKEN UNDER NOR MAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESS CIRCUMSTANCES. THEREFORE, WE AR E OF THE CONSIDERED VIEW THAT THE AO WAS ERRED IN MAKING ADD ITIONS TOWARDS UNSECURED LOAN TAKEN FROM COMPANIES CONTROL LED AND MANAGED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN U/S 68 OF THE ACT. 14. COMING TO THE CASES RELIED UPON BY THE ASSESSE E, THE ASSESSEE HAS RELIED UPON VARIOUS JUDICIAL PRECEDENC E INCLUDING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CA SE OF CIT VS LOVELY EXPORT PVT. LTD. (2008) 216 CTR 195. THE CAS E LAWS RELIED UPON BY THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DEALT AS UNDER :- CIT VS. GOA SPONGE AND POWER LTD (13/02/2012) TAX A PPEAL NO. 16 OF 2012 (HIGH COURT-BOMBAY) 'ONCE THE AUTHORITIES HAVE GOT ALL THE DETAI LS, INCLUDING THE NAME AND ADDRESSES OF THE SHAREHOLDERS, THEIR PAN/GIR NUMBER , SO ALSO THE NAME OF THE BANK FROM WHICH THE ALLEGED INVESTORS RECEIVED MONEY A S SHARE APPLICATION, THEN, IT CANNOT BE TERMED AS 'BOGUS'. THE CONTROVERSY IS COVERED BY THE JUDGEMENTS RENDERED B Y THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF LOVELY EXPORTS PVT LTD, VS. CIT, (2008) 216 CTR (SC) 195, AS ALSO BY THIS COURT IN CIT VS. CREATIVE WORLD TELE FILMS LTD, (2011) 333 ITR 100 (BOM). IN SUCH CIRCUM STANCES, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE TRIBUNAL'S FINDING THAT THERE IS NO JUSTI FICATION IN THE ADDITION MADE UNDER 33 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. SECTION 68 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,, 1961 NEI THER SUFFERS FROM ANY PERVERSITY NOR GIVES RISE TO ANY SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW.' CIT VS. CREATIVE WORLD TELE FILMS LTD (2011) 333 IT R 100 (BORN-HIGH COURT) 'THE QUESTION SOUGHT TO BE RAISED IN THE AP PEAL WAS ALSO RAISED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AND THE TRIBUNAL WAS PLEASED TO FOLL OW THE JUDGMENT OF THE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. LOVELY EXPORTS (P) LTD. (2 008) 216 CTR (SC) 195. WHEREIN THE APEX COURT OBSERVED THAT IF THE SHARE AP PLICATION MONEY IS RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE-COMPANY FROM ALLEGED BOGUS SHAREHO LDERS, W HOSE NAMES ARE GIVEN TO THE AO, THEN THE DEPARTMENT CAN ALWAYS PR OCEED AGAINST THEM AND IF NECESSARY REOPEN THEIR INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENTS. IN THE CASE IN HAND, IT IS NOT DISPUTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD GIVEN THE DETA ILS OF NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE SHAREHOLDER, THEIR PAN/GIR NUMBER AND HAD ALS O GIVEN THE CHEQUE NUMBER, NAME OF THE BANK. IT WAS EXPECTED ON THE PART OF TH E AO TO MAKE PROPER INVESTIGATION AND REACH THE SHAREHOLDERS. THE AO DID NOTHING EXCEPT ISSUING SUMMONS WHICH WERE ULTIMATELY RETURNED BACK WIT H AN ENDORSEMENT 'NOT TRACEABLE IN OUR CONSIDERED VIEW, THE AO OUGHT TO HAVE FOUND OUT THEIR DETAILS THROUGH PAN CARDS, BANK ACCOUNT DETAILS OR FROM THEIR BANKERS SO AS TO REACH THE SHAREHOLDERS SINCE ALL THE RELEVANT MATERIAL DETAILS AND PARTICULARS WERE GIVEN BY THE ASSESSEE TO THE AO. IN THE ABOVE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE VIEW TAKEN BY THE TRIBUNAL CANNOT BE FAULTED.' CIT VS. LOVELY EXPORTS (P) LTD (2008) 216 CTR 195 ( SC) 'IF THE SHARE APPLICATION MONEY IS RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE COMPANY FROM ALLEGED BOGUS SHAREHOLDERS, WHOSE NAMES ARE GIVEN TO THE AO , THEN THE DEPARTMENT IS FREE TO PROCEED TO REOPEN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AS SESSMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, BUT IT CANNOT BE REGARDED AS UNDISCLOSED INCOME OF ASSESSEE COMPANY.' CIT VS. STELLER INVESTMENT LTD (2001) 251 ITR 263 ( SC) (CIVIL APPEAL) 'THAT THE INCREASE IN SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL OF THE RESPONDENT COMPANY COULD NOT BE A DEVICE OF CONVERTING BLACK MONEY INTO WHITE W ITH THE HELP OF FORMATION OF AN INVESTMENT COMPANY, ON THE ROUND THAT, EVEN IF IT BE ASSUMED THAT THE SUBSCRIBERS TO THE INCREASED CAPITAL WERE NOT GENUINE, TINDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES COULD THE AMOUNT OF SHARE CAPITAL BE REGARDE D AS UN DISCLOSED INCOME, AN APPEAL WAS TAKEN BY THE DEPARTMENT TO THE SU PREME COURT. THE SUPREME COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL HOLDING THAT THE T RIBUNAL HAD COME TO A CONCLUSION ON FACTS AND NO INTERFERENCE WAS CALL ED FOR.' CIT VS. NAV BHARAT DUOLEX LTD (2013) 35 TAXMANN.COM 289 (ALL-HIGH COURT) 'WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE ARGUMENTS OF THE COUNSEL FO R THE PARTIES. CIT(A) FOUND THAT FIVE COMPANIES SUBSCRIBING THE EQUITY SH ARES AMOUNTING TO RS. 25,00.000/- WERE IDENTIFIED AND THEY HAD SUBMI TTED THEIR BANK STATEMENTS, CASH EXTRACTS AND RETURNS FILING RECEIPTS. AS SUCH I DENTITY OF THE SHARE APPLICANT COMPANIES AND PURCHASE OF SHARE HAD BEEN PROV ED BY THE ASSESSEE. SUPREME COURT IN THE CASES OF CIT V. STELLER INVEST MENTS LTD. [2001] 251 ITR 263 AND LOVELY EXPORTS CASE (SUPRA), HAS HELD THAT THE ID ENTITY OF THE SHAREHOLDER ALONE 34 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. IS REQUIRED TO BE PROVED, IN CASE OF THE CA PITAL CONTRIBUTED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS. ACCORDINGLY CIT(A) AND THE TRIBUN AL HAS NOT COMMITTED ANY ILLEGALITY IN ALLOWING THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. WE DO NOT FIND ANY ILLEGALITY IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE CIT(A) AND THE TRIBUNAL.' CIT VS. JAYDEE SECURITIES & FINANCE LTD (2013) 32 T AXMANN.COM91 (ALL- HIGH COURT) 'THE TRIBUNAL RECORDED FINDINGS THAT THE ASSE SSEE HAD PRODUCED THE RETURN OF INCOME FILED BY THE RELEVANT SHAREHOLDERS WHO HAD P AID SHARE APPLICATION MONEY. THE ASSESSEE HAD ALSO PRODUCED THE CONFIRMATIO N OF SHARE HOLDERS INDICATING THE DETAILS OF ADDRESSES, PAN AND PARTICULARS OF CHEQUES THROUGH WHICH THE AMOUNT WAS PAID TOWARDS THE SHARE APPLICATION MONEY. THE TRIBUNAL THEREAFTER RELIED UPON THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT IN C IT V. LOVELY EXPORTS (P.) LTD WHEREIN IT WAS HELD THAT IF THE ASSESSEE PROD UCES THE NAMES, ADDRESSES, PAN DETAILS OF THE SHARE HOLDERS THEN THE ONUS ON T HE ASSESSEE TO PROVE THE SOURCE O F SHARE APPLICATION MONEY STANDS DISCHARGED. IF THE ASSESSING AUTHORITY WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF TH E SHAREHOLDERS, IT WAS OPEN TO THE ASSESSING AUTHORITY TO VERIFY THE SAME IN THE HANDS OF THE SHAREHOLDERS CONCERNED, THE TRIBUNAL HAS RELIED UPON AN ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CASE O F CIT V. DIVINE LEASING & FINANCE LTD . IN VIEW OF THE DECISION 'OF THE SUPREME COURT, WE DISMISS THE APPEALS WITH OBSERVAT IONS THAT THE DEPARTMENT IS FREE TO PROCEED TO REOPEN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AS SESSMENTS OF THE SHAREHOLDERS WHOSE NAMES AND DETAILS WERE GIVEN TO THE ASSES SING OFFICER.' ACIT VS. VENKATESHWARLSPAT PVT LTD (2009) 319 ITR 3 93 (CHHATISGARH- HIGH COURT) 'IF THE SHARE APPLICATIONS ARE RECEIVED BY THE ASSE SSEE FROM ALLEGED BOGUS SHAREHOLDERS, WHOSE NAMES ARE GIVEN TO THE ASSESSIN G OFFICER, THEN THE DEPARTMENT IS FREE TO PROCEED TO REOPEN THEI R INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, BUT IT CANNOT BE REGARDED AS T HE UNDISCLOSED INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE.' MOD CREATIONS PVT LTD VS. /TO (2013) 354 ITR 282 (D EL-HIGH COURT) 'HELD, ALLOWING THE APPEAL, (I) THAT THE ASS ESSEE HAD DISCHARGED THE INITIAL ONUS PLACED ON IT. IN THE EVENT THE REVENUE STILL H AD A DOUBT WITH REGARD TO THE GENUINENESS OF THE TRANSACTIONS IN ISSUE OR A S REGARDS THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE CREDITORS, IT WOULD HAVE HAD TO DISCHARGE THE ONUS WHICH HAD SHIFTED ON TO IT. A BALD ASSERTION BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER THAT THE CREDITS WERE A CIRCULAR ROUTE ADOPTED BY THE ASSESSEE TO PLOUGH BACK ITS OWN UNDISCLOSED INCOME INTO ITS ACCOUNTS, COULD BE OF N O AVAIL. THE REVENUE WAS REQUIRED TO PROVE THIS ALLEGATION. AN ALLEGATION BY ITSELF WHICH IS BASED ON ASSUMPTION WILL NOT PASS MUSTER IN LAW. THE REVENUE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BRID GE THE GAP BETWEEN THE SUSPICIONS AND PROOF IN ORDER TO BRING HOME THIS AL LEGATION. THE TRIBUNAL WITHOUT ADVERTING TO THE PRINCIPLE LAID STRESS ON THE FACT THAT DESPITE OPPORTUNITIES, THE ASSESSEE AND/OR THE CREDITORS HAD NOT PROVED THE GENUINENESS OF THE TRANSACTION. BASED ON THIS IT CONSTRUED THE IN TENTIONS OF THE ASSESSEE AS BEING MALA FIDE. THE TRIBUNAL OUGHT TO HAVE ANALYSED THE MATERIAL RATHER THAN BE BURDENED BY THE FACT THAT SOME OF THE CREDITORS HAD CHOSEN NOT TO MAKE A PERSONAL 35 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. APPEARANCE BEFORE THE ASSESSING OFFICER. IF THE ASS ESSING OFFICER HAD ANY DOUBT ABOUT THE MATERIAL PLACED ON RECORD, WHICH WAS LARGELY BANK STATEMENTS OF THE CREDITORS AND THEIR INCOME-TAX RETURNS, IT COUL D GATHER THE NECE SARY INFORMATION FROM THE SOURCES TO WHICH THE INFORMATION WA S ATTRIBUTABLE......IF IT HAD ANY DOUBTS WITH REGARD TO THEIR CREDITWORTHINESS, THE REVENUE COULD ALWAYS BRING THE SUM IN QUESTION TO TAX IN THE HANDS OF THE CR EDITORS OR SUB- CREDITORS.' CIT VS. AL ANAM AGRO FOODS (P.) LTD (2013) 38 TAXMA NN.CORN 375 (ALL- HIGH COURT) TRIBUNAL, H O WE V E R , H E LD THAT SINCE IDE NTITY O F S H A R E H O LD E R S S TO O D P R O V E D O N RECORD, AMOUNT OF SHARE APPLIC ATION MONEY COULD NOT BE ADDED TO INCOME OF ASSESSEE. ACCORDING TO TRIBUNAL, IN SUCH A CASE AMOUNT COULD BE TAXED IN HANDS OF PERSONS WHO HAD INVESTED' CIT VS. DWARKADHISH INVESTMENT (P) LTD (2011) 330 I TR 298 (DEL-HIGH COURT) 'JUST BECAUSE THE CREDITORS/SHARE APPLICANTS C OULD NOT BE FOUND AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN, IT WOULD NOT GIVE THE REVENUE THE RIGHT TO INVOKE S. 68 REVENUE HAS ALL THE POWER AND WHEREWITHAL TO TRACE ANY PERSONMOREOVER, IT IS SETTLED LAW THAT THE ASSESSEE NEED NOT TO PROV E THE 'SOURCE OF SOURCE' IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE TRIBUNAL HAS CONFIRMED THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) DELETING THE IMPUGNED ADDITION HOLDING T HAT THE ASSESSEE H AS BEEN ABLE TO PROVE THE IDENTITY OF THE SHARE APPLICANTS AND THE SHARE APPLICATION MONEY HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY WAY OF ACCOUNT PAYEE CHEQUES.' CIT VS. NAMASTEY CHEMICALS PVT LTD (2013) 33 TAXMAN N.COM271 (GUJ- HIGH COURT) 'IN THE PRESENT CASE ALSO, THE RESPONDENT AS SESSEE HAS RECEIVED SHARE APPLICATION MONEY FROM DIFFERENT SUB SCRIBERS. IT W AS FOUND THAT LARGE NUMBER OF SUBSCRIBERS HAD RESPONDED TO THE LETTERS ISSUED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER OR SUMMONS ISSUED BY HIM AND SUBMITTED THEIR AFF IDAVITS. IN SO ME CASES SUCH REPLIES WERE NOT RECEIVED THROUGH POSTS. RS. 9 LACS REPRESENTED THOSE ASSESSEES WHO DENIED HAVING MADE ANY INVESTMEN T ALTOGETHER. THE ISSUE THUS WOULD FALL SQUARELY WITHIN THE AMBIT OF THE JUDGM ENT OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF LOVELY EXPORTS (SUPRA). NO ERROR OF LAW CAN BE STATED TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED BY THE TRIBUNAL. TAX APPEAL IS THE REFORE DISMISSED.' CIT VS. PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL LTD (2013) 356 ITR 65 (MP-HIGH COURT) ' HELD , DISMISSING THE APPEALS , THAT IT THE ASSESSEE HAD RECEIVED SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE PUBLIC OR RIGHTS ISSUE T HROUGH BANKING CHANNELS AND FURNISHED COMPLETE DETAILS OF THE SHAREHOLDERS, NO ADDITION COULD BE MADE TINDER SECTION 68 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, IN TH E ABSENCE OF ANY POSITIVE MATERIAL OR EVIDENCE TO INDICATE THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS WERE BENAMIDARS OR FICTITIOUS PERSONS OR THAT ANY PART O F THE SHARE CAPIT AL REPRESENTED THE COMPANY'S OWN INCOME FROM UNDISCLOSED SOURCES. IT WAS NOBODY 'S CASE THAT THE NON-RESIDENT INDIAN COMPANY WAS A BOGUS OR NON-EXISTENT CO MPANY OR THAT THE AMOUNT SUBSCRIBED BY THE COMPANY BY WAY OF SHARE SU BSCRIPTION WAS IN FACT THE MONEY OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE HAD ESTAB LISHED THE IDENTITY OF THE 36 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. INVESTOR WHO HAD PROVIDED THE SHARE SUBSCRIPTION AN D THAT THE TRANSACTION WAS GENUINE. THOUGH THE ASSESSEE'S CONTENTION WAS THAT THE CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE CREDITOR WAS ALSO ESTABLISHED, IN THIS CASE, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE IDENTITY OF THE INVESTOR ALONE WAS TO BE SEEN. THUS, THE ADDITI ON WAS RIGHTLY DELETED.' CIT VS. SHREE RAMA MULTI TECH LTD (2013) 34 TAXMANN .COM177 (GUJ-HC) 'IT IS NOTED THAT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) AS WELL AS THE TRIBUNAL HAVE DULY CONSIDERED ISSUE AND HAVING FOUND COMPLETE DET AILS OF THE RECEIPTS OF SHARE APPLICATION MONEY, ALONGWITH THE FORM NAMES A ND ADDRESSES, PAN AND OTHER REQUISITE DETAILS, THEY FOUND COMPLETE ABSENCE OF T HE GROUNDS NOTED FOR INVOKING THE PROVISION OF SECTION 68. MOREOVER, BOTH RIG HTLY HAD APPLIED THE DECISION OF CIT VS. LOVELY EXPORTS (P) LTD TO THE CASE OF THE A SSESSEE. THEREFORE, NO REASON WAS FOUND IN ABSENCE OF ANY ILLEGALITY MUCH LESS ANY PERVERSITY TOO TO INTERFERE WITH THE ORDER OF THE BOTH THESE AUTHORITIES , WHO HAD CONCURRENTLY HELD THE DUE DETAILS HAVING BEEN PROVED. THE ASSESSEE COMPAN Y HAD PRESENTED THE NECESSARY WORTH PROOF BEFORE BOTH THE AUTHORIT IES AND IT WAS NOT EXPECTED BY THE ASSESSEE COMPANY TO FURTHER PROVE THE SOURC E OF THE DECEASED.' CIT VS. NIKUNJ EXIMP ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD (2013) 35 TAXRNANN.COM384 (BOM) 'WHETHER MERELY BECAUSE SUPPLIERS HAD NOT APP EARED BEFORE ASSESSING OFFICER OR COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), IT COU LD NOT BE C ONCLUDED THAT PURCHASES WERE NOT MADE BY ASSESSEE - HELD, YES.... FURTHER, THERE WERE CONFIRMATION LETTERS FILED BY THE SUPPLIERS, COPIES OF INVOICES FO R PURCHASES AS WELL AS COPIES OF BANK STATEMENT ALL OF WHICH WOULD INDICATE T HAT THE PURCHASES WERE IN FACT MADE. IN OUR VIEW, MERELY BECAUSE THE SUPPLI ERS HAVE NOT APPEARED BEFORE THE ASSESSING OFFICER OR THE CIT(A), ONE CANN OT CONCLUDE THAT THE PURCHASES WERE NOT MADE BY THE RESPONDENT- ASSESSEE' CIT VS. SAMIR BIO- TECH PVT LTD (2010) 325 ITR 294 (DEL-HIGH COURT) 'IDENTITIES OF THE SUBSCRIBERS ARE NOT IN DO UBT. THE TRANSACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN UNDERTAKEN THROUGH BANKING CHANNELS INASMU CH AS THE APPLICATION MONEY FOR THE SHARES WAS GIVEN THROUGH ACCOUNT PAYEE CHEQ UES. THE CREDITWORTHINESS HAS ALSO BEEN ESTABLISHED, AS INDICATED BY THE TRIBU NAL. THE SUBSCRIBERS HAVE GIVEN THEIR COMPLETE DETAILS WITH REGARD TO THEIR TAX RET URNS AND ASSESSMENTS. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE DEPARTMENT COULD NOT DRAW AN ADV ERSE INFERENCE AGAINST THE ASSESSEE ONLY BECAUSE THE SUB SCRIBERS DID NOT INITIALLY RESPOND TO THE SUMMONS. THE SUBSCRIBERS, HOWEVER, SUBSEQUENTLY GAVE THEIR CONFIRMATION LETTERS AS WOULD BE APPARENT FROM THE IMPUGNED O RDER. THE IDENTITY OF THE SUBSCRIBERS STANDS ESTABLISHED AND IT IS ALSO A FAC T THAT THEY HAVE SHOWN THE SAID AMOUNTS IN THEIR AUDITED BALANCE SHEETS AND HAVE ALSO FILED RETURNS BEFORE THE IT AUTHORITIES. THE DECISION OF THE TRIB UNAL DELETING THE ADDITION CANNOT BEFAULTED. 37 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 15. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO RELIED UPON VARIOUS DE CISION OF THE CO-ORDINATE BENCH OF ITAT, MUMBAI. WE FIND THAT THE COORDINATE BENCH OF ITAT MUMBAI, IN NUMBER OF CASES HAS CONSIDERED AN IDENTICAL ISSUE IN LIGHT OF SEARCH AN D SEIZURE OPERATIONS AS WELL AS SURVEY CONDUCTED BY THE DEPAR TMENT IN LIGHT OF STATEMENT OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN RECORDED DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH U/S 132(4) OF THE ACT. THE TRIBUNA L AFTER CONSIDERING THE RELEVANT FACTS AND ALSO CONSIDERING THE RETRACTED STATEMENTS FILED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT ONE DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE TO PROVE THE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS AND CREDI TWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES ARE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED THE FACT THA T THE TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE GENUINE WHICH ARE UNDERTAKEN UNDER NORMAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESS, NO REA SON FOR THE AO TO MAKE ADDITIONS U/S 68 OF THE ACT. 16. WE FURTHER NOTED THAT IN MOST OF THE CA SES, THE TRIBUNAL HAS CONSIDERED THE COMPANIES CONTROLLED AN D OPERATED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN IN LIGHT OF OBSERVATIONS MA DE BY THE AO TO MAKE ADDITION U/S 68 OF THE ACT. WE FURTHER N OTED THAT THE COORDINATE BENCH OF ITAT, MUMBAI, IN THE CASE O F SHRI SUMIT J. JAIN VS ACIT IN ITA NO.145/MUM/2017 HAD AN 38 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. OCCASION TO CONSIDER IDENTICAL ISSUE IN LIGHT OF UN SECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND MANAGED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. THE COORDINATE BENCH, AFTER CONSID ERING THE RELEVANT FACTS, HAS HELD THAT WHEN ASSESSEE HAS FIL ED VARIOUS DOCUMENTS TO PROVE THREE INGREDIENTS PROVIDED U/S 6 8 OF THE ACT, THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE AO TO MAKE ADDITION S TOWARDS U/S 68 OF THE ACT ONLY ON THE BASIS OF STATEMENT OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. THE RELEVANT FINDINGS OF THE TRIBU NAL ARE AS UNDER:- 3. I HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PER USED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. THE FACTS IN BRIEF AR E THAT THE ASSESSEE AN INDIVIDUAL ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF B UILDER AND DEVELOPER DECLARED LOSS OF RS. 1,29,68,736 IN HIS R ETURN ON 15.09.2009. THE ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED U/S 143(3) OF THE ACT ON 30.11.2011 ASSESSING THE LOSS AT RS. 1,13,73 ,448. THE ASSESSEE CARRIED THE MATTER IN APPEAL BEFORE THE LE ARNED CIT(A) WHEREIN VIDE ORDER DATED 03.02.2014, PART RELIEF WA S GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEE. LATER ON, THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE WAS RE- OPENED U/S 147 ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS RECEIVED ACCOMMODATION ENTRY OF UNSECURED LOAN FROM M/S. LAXMI TRADING COMPANY, M/S. MOULI GEMS, M/S. MINAL GEMS, M/S. NAMAN EXPORTS AND M/S. PRIME STAR, PERTAINING TO BHAWARLAL JAIN GROUP. AS PER THE ASSESSEE, DURING T HE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCES PERTA INING TO LOAN FROM AFOREMENTIONED PARTIES LIKE CONFIRMATION, BANK STATEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RETURN OF INCOME OF LOAN, BANK STATEMENT OF THE ASSESSEE REFLECTING THE AMOUN TS AND GENUINENESS OF TRANSACTIONS WERE FILED. HOWEVER, TH E LEARNED ASSESSING OFFICER TREATED THE LOAN AS UNEXPLAINED C ASH CREDIT ON THE PLEA THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT PRODUCE THE PARTIES. THEREAFTER, THE LEARNED ASSESSING OFFICER COMPUTED THE PEAK OF UNSECURE LOAN AMOUNTING TO RS. 1,91,00,000 AND MADE ADDITION OF RS. 40,00,000 U/S 68 OF THE ACT. ON APPEAL, BEFO RE THE LEARNED CIT(A), THE ADDITION SO MADE WAS DIRECTED T O BE DELETED. THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIB UNAL. 39 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 4. IF THE OBSERVATIONS MADE IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER LEADING TO THE ADDITION AND THE CONCLUSION ARRIVED AT IN TH E IMPUGNED ORDER, IF KEPT IN JUXTAPOSITION, AND ANALYSED THERE IS A FACTUAL FINDING IN PARA-5.3 THAT THE ASSESSEE DISCHARGED TH E PRIMARY ONUS AS THE LENDER HAD RESPONDED TO NOTICES ISSUED U/S 133(6) OF THE ACT CONFIRMING THE TRANSACTION. THE LEARNED ASSESSING OFFICER DID NOT CONTROVERT THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSE E. THE LOANS WERE TAKEN THROUGH BANKING CHANNEL AND THE RECEIPT OF TAKING THE LOAN HAS BEEN DULY EXAMINED IN PARA-5.3 (PAGE-1 3) OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER. THE LOANS WERE DULY REFLECTED IN TH E LOANS AND ADVANCES COLUMN IN THE BALANCE SHEET AND THERE IS F URTHER FACTUAL RECORDING THAT THERE WAS NEITHER ANY CASH D EPOSIT NOR ANY WITHDRAWAL IN ANY BANK ACCOUNT CASTIGATING THE SAME AS ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES. IT IS FURTHER NOTED THAT THE ASSESSEE DULY PAID THE INTEREST ON THE LOAN AMOUNT AND DEDUC TED. COPY OF FORM NO.16A WAS ALSO FILED AND THE LEARNED ASSES SING OFFICER HAS NOT BROUGHT ON RECORD ANY EVIDENCE / RE ASON TO DISBELIEVE THE EVIDENCE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. I AM SATISFIED WITH THE REASONING OF THE LEARNED CIT(A) THAT THE A DDITION WAS MERELY MADE ON THE BASIS OF PRESUMPTION THAT ALL TH E FIVE CONCERNS FROM WHOM LOAN WAS TAKEN WERE MANAGED AND CONTROLLED BY SHRI BHAWARLAL JAIN. THE STATEMENT WA S ALSO RECORDED WHEREIN THERE IS NO MENTION THAT ANY ACCOM MODATION ENTRY WAS OBTAINED. RATHER, THE CASE OF THE ASSESSE E IS FORTIFIED BY THE REPLY TO QUESTION NO.40 AND 41 WHEREIN IT HA S BEEN TENDERED THAT THE LOAN WAS ADVANCED AND INTEREST @ 9% P.A. WAS CHARGED. THE NAME OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOWHERE ME NTIONED IN THE LIST OF SUSPICIOUS DEALER / PERSON. THUS, I FIND NO INFIRMITY IN THE CONCLUSION OF THE LEARNED CIT(A), RESULTING INTO DISMISSAL OF THE IMPUGNED GROUND RAISED BY THE REVENUE. 5. THE NEXT GROUND PERTAINED TO DELETION OF ADDITIO N OF RS. 5,78,278, MADE ON ACCOUNT OF INTEREST EXPENDITURE O N ALLEGED BOGUS LOANS. THE LEARNED D.R. DEFENDED THE ADDITION , WHEREAS, THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE INVITED MY ATT ENTION TO THE FINDING RECORDED IN PARA-6.1 OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER. ON A PERUSAL OF RECORD AND THE ASSERTIONS MADE BY THE RE SPECTIVE COUNSELS. THERE IS A FINDING IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER THAT THE ASSESSEE DULY PRODUCED THE BANK STATEMENT FROM WHER E INTERESTS WERE PAID ALSO COPIES OF FORM NO.16A EVID ENCING THE TDS MADE AND DEPOSITED INTO THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT WITH RESPECT TO PAYMENT OF INTEREST. SINCE IN EARLIER PA RAS OF THIS ORDER SINCE I HAVE UPHELD THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED CIT(A), THEREFORE, THE ISSUE OF INTEREST IS CONSEQUENTIAL I N NATURE, THEREFORE, THE CONCLUSION DRAWN IN THE IMPUGNED ORD ER IS UPHELD. 40 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 17. COMING TO THE CASES RELIED UPON BY THE LD. DR IN LIGHT OF VARIOUS CASE LAWS DISCUSSED BY THE AO AS W ELL AS THE LD. CIT(A). WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE CASES RELIED UPO N BY THE LD. DR AS WELL AS THE LD. CIT(A) IN LIGHT OF FACTS OF P RESENT CASE AND WE FOUND THAT THE CASE LAWS CONSIDERED BY LOWER AUT HORITIES WERE RENDERED UNDER DIFFERENT SET OF FACTS WHICH CA NNOT BE APPLIED TO THE FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE. ACCORDING LY, THE CASES RELIED UPON BY THE LD. DR ARE REJECTED. 18. IN THIS VIEW OF THE MATTER AND CONSIDERING THE RATIO OF CASE LAWS DISCUSSED HEREINABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONS IDERED VIEW THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS DISCHARGED INITIAL BURDEN BY FILING VARIOUS DOCUMENTS TO PROVE IDENTITY, GENUINENESS OF TRANSAC TIONS AND CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE PARTIES. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED VIEW THAT THE AO WAS ERRED IN MAKING ADD ITIONS TOWARDS UNSECURED LOAN U/S 68 OF THE ACT. THE LD. C IT(A) WITHOUT APPRECIATING THESE FACTS SIMPLY CONFIRMED T HE ADDITION MADE BY THE AO. HENCE, WE REVERSE THE FINDINGS OF T HE LD. CIT(A) AND DIRECT THE AO TO DELETE THE ADDITIONS MA DE TOWARDS UNSECURED LOANS U/S 68 OF THE ACT. 19. THE NEXT ISSUE CAME UP FOR OUR CONSIDERATION I S DISALLOWANCE OF INTEREST AND ESTIMATION OF COMMISSI ON ON 41 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. UNSECURED LOANS OBTAINED FROM COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND OPERATED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN. THE AO HAS DISALL OWED INTEREST PAID ON UNSECURED LOANS ON THE GROUND THAT ONCE LOANS HAVE BEEN TREATED AS BOGUS ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES, T HEN ANY INTEREST PAID ON SUCH UNSECURED LOANS ALSO NEEDS TO BE TREATED AS BOGUS AND ACCORDINGLY DISALLOWED TOTAL INTEREST PAID ON UNSECURED LOANS. SIMILARLY, THE AO HAS ESTIMATED 0 .2% COMMISSION ON TOTAL UNSECURED LOANS TAKEN FROM COMP ANIES ON THE BASIS OF STATEMENT OF SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN WHER E HE HAD ADMITTED THAT HE CHARGED 0.2% COMMISSION ON ALL ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES. WE NOTED THAT THE ISSUE OF U NSECURED LOANS HAS BEEN DECIDED IN PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS, WHE RE WE HELD THAT THE TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE GENUI NE WHICH CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS UNEXPLAINED CASH CREDIT U/S 68 OF THE ACT, CONSEQUENTLY, ADDITIONS MADE TOWARDS DISALLOWA NCE OF INTEREST AND ESTIMATION OF COMMISSION ON SUCH UNSEC URED LOANS IS ALSO NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT O F DISCUSSIONS IN THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF T HE CONSIDERED VIEW THAT THE AO AS WELL AS THE LD. CIT( A) WAS ERRED IN MAKING ADDITIONS TOWARDS INTEREST ON UNSECURED L OANS AND COMMISSION ON SUCH UNSECURED LOANS. ACCORDINGLY, WE DIRECT 42 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. THE AO TO DELETE THE ADDITIONS MADE TOWARDS DISALLO WANCE OF INTEREST AND ESTIMATION OF COMMISSION. 20. THE NEXT ISSUE THAT CAME UP FOR OUR CONSIDERAT ION FROM ASSESSEES APPEAL IS ADDITIONS TOWARDS ALLEGED BOGUS PURCHASES FROM M/S ANKIT ENTEPRISES AND M/S AKASH INTERNATIONAL. THE AO HAS MADE ADDITIONS TOWARDS PU RCHASES ON THE GROUND THAT ALTHOUGH THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED BASIC EVIDENCES INCLUDING CONFIRMATIONS FROM THE PARTIES, BUT WHEN NOTICE U/S 133(6) WERE ISSUED, SUCH NOTICES WERE RE TURNED UNSERVED WITH A REMARK ADDRESS NOT KNOWN. THE AO FURTHER OBSERVED THAT WHEN NOTICES WERE RETURNED UNSERVED, INSPECTOR ATTACHED TO THE OFFICE WAS DEPUTED TO MAKE FURTHER LOCAL ENQUIRIES WITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED PARTIE S. THE ENQUIRIES CONDUCTED BY THE INSPECTOR HAVE ALSO REVE ALED THAT NO SUCH PARTIES/FIRM/COMPANIES ARE IN EXISTENCE AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS A CONTENTION OF THE AS SESSEE THAT IT HAS FILED ENTIRE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCES OF THE VENDO R SUCH AS INVOICES, LEDGER CONFIRMATIONS, BANK STATEMENTS, DE LIVERY CHALLANS TO PROVE GENUINENESS OF THE PURCHASES. THE AO NEITHER POINTED OUT ANY DISCREPANCY IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT S OR EVIDENCES FILED BY THE ASSESSEE NOR MADE OUT A CASE OF SALES 43 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. OUTSIDE THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS. THE SOLE BASIS OF AL LEGING THE PURCHASE TRANSACTION TO BE ACCOMMODATION ENTRIES IS STATEMENT OF VARIOUS PARTIES. BUT, IN SPITE OF SPECIFIC REQUE ST, THE AO DECLINED TO PROVIDE THE STATEMENT AND EVIDENCES REL IED UPON AND ALSO DENIED OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS EXAMINES THOSE PARTIES. THE ASSESSEE FURTHER CONTENDED THAT IN ABSENCE OF A NY INCORRECTNESS IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS AND SALES MA DE OUTSIDE THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT, NO ADVERSE INFERENCE COULD BE DRAWN SO AS TO TREAT THE PURCHASES FROM CERTAIN PARTIES ARE BOGUS WHEN ASSESSEE HAS FURNISHED COMPLETE DETAILS INCLUDING CONFIRMATIONS FROM THE PARTIES. 21. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH PARTIES, PERUSED THE MAT ERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD AND GONE THROUGH ORDERS OF THE AUTHORITIES BELOW. IT IS AN ADMITTED FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED COMPLETE INFORMATION INCLUDING PURCHASE BILLS, PAYM ENT PROOF, AGAINST SUCH PURCHASES THROUGH PROPER BANKING CHANN ELS AND ALSO CONFIRMATIONS FROM THE PARTIES. IT IS ALSO AN ADMITTED FACT THAT WHEN THE AO ISSUED NOTICE U/S 133(6), SUCH NOT ICES WERE RETURNED UNSERVED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES. THE AO OBSERVED THAT THE REPORT OF INSPECTOR ATTACHED TO THE OFFICE OF THE AO ALSO CONFIRMED THE FACT THAT PARTIES WERE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE GIVEN 44 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. ADDRESSES. UNDER THESE FACTUAL BACKGROUNDS, THE ISS UE NEEDS TO BE EXAMINED WHETHER THE PURCHASES FROM ABOVE TWO PA RTIES CAN BE CONSIDERED AS BOGUS AND IF AT ALL PURCHASES ARE BOGUS WHAT IS THE ADDITIONS TO BE MADE U/S 69C OF THE ACT. THE AO CLAIMS THAT THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO PROVE THE PURCHASES WIT H NECESSARY EVIDENCES. IT IS CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE THAT IT HAS FILED COMPLETE DETAILS OF PURCHASES INCLUDING CONFIRMATIONS FROM T HE PARTIES. WE FIND THAT THE AO NEITHER CARRIED OUT FULL ENQUIR Y TO REACH TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE PURCHASES FROM ABOVE PARTIE S ARE BOGUS PURCHASES NOR MADE OUT A CASE OF DISCREPANCY IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS. WHEN THE AO HAS NOT POINTED OUT ANY DISCR EPANCIES IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OR STOCK DETAILS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE MERELY FOR THE REASON THAT NOTICES ISSUED U/S 133(6 ) WERE RETURNED UNSERVED, NO ADVERSE INFERENCE COULD NOT B E DRAWN AGAINST THE ASSESSEE, WHEN ASSESSEE HAS FILED SUFFI CIENT MATERIAL IN ORDER TO PROVE THE PURCHASES FROM THE A BOVE PARTIES, NO DOUBT, IT IS AN ADMITTED FACT THAT THE PARTIES W ERE NEVER RESPONDED TO NOTICE U/S 133(6), BUT THAT BY ITSELF WOULD NOT BE A GROUND FOR HOLDING THE PURCHASES AS BOGUS IN NATU RE, THAT TOO WHEN MATERIALS FURNISHED BY THE ASSESSEE PROVES OTH ERWISE. THE ASSESSEE HAS DONE ITS AT BEST AND FILED WHATEVE R 45 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. INFORMATION AVAILABLE WITH IT. THE APPEARANCE OF TH E PARTIES IS NOT WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE ASSESSEE. FURTHER, WH EN THE PARTIES ARE NOT APPEARED BEFORE THE AO IN RESPONSE TO NOTICES, THEN SEPARATE PROCEDURE IS PROVIDED UNDER THE ACT T O DEAL WITH THOSE PARTIES. FOR THIS PURPOSE, THE ASSESSEE CANNO T BE BLAMED OR MADE RESPONSIBLE FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF PARTIES A ND ALSO PURCHASE FROM THE PARTIES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS B OGUS WHEN THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED ALL OTHER EVIDENCES TO PROVE THE PURCHASES FROM THE PARTIES. IN THIS CASE, THE ASSES SEE FILED COMPLETE DETAILS INCLUDING CONFIRMATIONS FROM THE P ARTIES. THE AO NEVER DISPUTED THIS FACT. THE AO ALSO ACCEPTED S ALE DECLARED BY THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDER ED VIEW THAT IT IS DIFFICULT TO ACCEPT THE ARGUMENTS OF THE AO T HAT PURCHASES FROM ABOVE PARTIES ARE BOGUS IN NATURE. 22. HAVING SAID SO, LET US EXAMINE WHAT IS THE AMO UNT OF ADDITIONS REQUIRED TO BE MADE WHEN BOTH PARTIES FAI LED TO CONCLUSIVELY PROVE THE PURCHASES IN THEIR FAVOUR. W E FIND THAT THIS ISSUE IS RECURRING ISSUE WHICH IS SUBJECT MATT ER OF DELIBERATIONS BY THE CO-ORDINATE BENCH OF ITAT, MUM BAI, IN NUMBER OF CASES. THE TRIBUNAL, AFTER CONSIDERING TH E RELEVANT FACTS AND ALSO TAKING NOTE OF NATURE OF BUSINESS CA RRIED OUT BY 46 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. THE PARTIES CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT WHEN BOTH P ARTIES ARE FAILED TO PROVE THEIR CONTENTION, THEN ONLY PROFIT ELEMENT EMBEDDED IN THOSE PURCHASES NEEDS TO BE TAXED IN OR DER TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES. THE HONBLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LD. VIJAY PROTEINS VS CIT (2015) 58 TAXMANN.COM 44(GUJ.) HAD TAKEN SIMILAR VIEW IN LIGH T OF FACTS BROUGHT BY THE PARTIES AND HELD THAT WHERE PURCHASE S ARE CONSIDERED TO BE BOGUS, THEN ONLY PROFIT ELEMENT EM BEDDED NEED TO BE TAXED. IN THESE CASES, THE ASSESSEE IS I N THE BUSINESS OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT. THE PROFIT ELEMENT OF R EAL ESTATE BUSINESS IS IN THE RANGE OF 8 TO 15% DEPENDING UPON THE TYPE OF PROJECTS AND PLACES WHERE PROJECT IS EXECUTED BY TH E PARTIES. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE AND ALSO CONSISTENT WITH VIEW TAKEN BY THE COORDINA TE BENCH IN THE NUMBER OF CASES IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE , WE DEEM IT APPROPRIATE TO DIRECT THE AO TO ESTIMATE 12.5% PROF IT ON ALLEGED BOGUS PURCHASES. ACCORDINGLY, WE DIRECT THE AO TO E STIMATE 12.5% PROFIT ON TOTAL ALLEGED BOGUS PURCHASES. 23. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR AY 2013-14 IS PARTLY ALLOWED. 47 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. ITA NO.2687/MUM/2018 & 2689/MUM2018 24. THE FACTS AND ISSUES INVOLVED IN THESE TWO APP EALS IS IDENTICAL TO THE FIRST ISSUE WHICH WE HAVE CONSIDER ED IN ITA NO.2688/MUM/2018 FOR AY 2013-14. THE REASONS GIVEN BY US IN PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS SHALL MUTATIS MUTANDIS APPL IES TO THIS APPEAL ALSO. THEREFORE, FOR DETAILED REASONS GIVEN IN PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS, WE DIRECT THE AO TO DELETE ADDITIONS MA DE TOWARDS UNSECURED LOANS U/S 68 OF THE ACT AND CONSEQUENT DISALLOWANCE OF INTEREST ON UNSECURED LOAN AND ESTI MATED COMMISSION PAYMENT ON SUCH UNSECURED LOANS. 25. IN THE RESULT, BOTH APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESS EE ARE ALLOWED. ITA NOS.2690 TO 2694/MUM/2018 & ITA NOS. 3226 TO 3229/MUM /2018 26. THE FACTS AND ISSUES INVOLVED IN THESE AP PEALS ARE ALSO IDENTICAL TO THE FACTS AND ISSUE WHICH WE HAVE ALRE ADY CONSIDERED IN ITA NO.2688/MUM/2018. THE REASONS GIV EN BY US IN PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS SHALL MUTATIS MUTANDIS A PPLY TO THESE APPEALS ALSO. THEREFORE, FOR THE DETAILED REA SONS GIVEN IN PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS IN ITA NO.2688/MUM/2018, WE DI RECT THE AO TO DELETE THE ADDITIONS MADE TOWARDS UNSECUR ED LOANS 48 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. TAKEN FROM COMPANIES CONTROLLED AND MANAGED BY SHRI BHANWARLAL JAIN AND CONSEQUENT DISALLOWANCE OF INTE REST PAID ON SUCH UNSECURED LOANS AND ALSO ADDITION TOWARDS E STIMATION AT 0.2% COMMISSION ON SUCH UNSECURED LOANS. 27. FINALLY, I. ITA NO.2688/MUM/2018 IS PARTLY ALLOWED. II. ITA NO.2687/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. III. ITA NO. 2689/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. IV. ITA NO.2692/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. V. ITA NO.2693/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. VI. ITA NO.2694/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. VII. ITANO.3226/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. VIII. ITANO.3227/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. IX. ITANO.3228/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. X. ITANO.3229/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. XI. ITANO.2690/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. XII. ITANO.2691/MUM/2018 IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON .03/05/2019. SD/- SD/- ( RAVISH SOOD ) (G. MANJUNATHA) #!$ /JUDICIAL MEMBER %!$ / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI; & DATED :03/05/2019 F{X~{T? P.S / /. .. !'&#'()*)+' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 49 M/S PABAL HOUSING PVT. LTD & ORS. 1. '( )* / THE APPELLANT (RESPECTIVE ASSESSEE) 2. +, )* / THE RESPONDENT. 3. -- . ( '( ) / THE CIT, MUMBAI. 4. -- . / CIT(A)- , MUMBAI, 5. 0 1+2 , -'(#'23 , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 1 45 / GUARD FILE. !' / BY ORDER, / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI