SAMUH SAMAJ SANGATHAN, Ludhiana V. CIT(Exemption), Chandigarh

ITA 326/CHANDI/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8688 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 3 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-02-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Appeal Filed On: 21-10-2020
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 12AA

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरणआयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च瀃डीगढ़ 瀈यायपीठ च瀃डीगढ़ 瀈यायपीठच瀃डीगढ़ 瀈यायपीठ च瀃डीगढ़ 瀈यायपीठ ‘‘बी बीबी बी.’’, च瀃डीगढ़ च瀃डीगढ़च瀃डीगढ़ च瀃डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘B’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर आयकरआयकर आयकर अपील अपीलअपील अपील सं संसं सं./ ITA No. 326/CHD/2020 [Assessment Year 2020-21] Samuh Samaj Sangathan, 11368, St. No. 6, Pavitar Nagar, Haibowal Kalan, Ludhiana. बनाम VS The CIT (Exemptions), Chandigarh. 瀡थायी लेखा सं./PAN /TAN No: AAZTS1785R अपीलाथ牸/Appellant 灹瀄यथ牸/Respondent िनधा榁琇रती क琉 ओर से/Assessee by : None (Adjournment Application) राज瀡व क琉 ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Sarabjit Singh, CIT तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18.01.2022 उदघोषणा क琉 तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 17.02.2022 VIRTUAL HEARING आदेश आदेशआदेश आदेश/ORDER PER DIVA SINGH The present appeal has been filed by the assessee wherein the correctness of the order dated 22.09.2020 of CIT(Exemptions) Chandigarh passed u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act is assailed on the following ground : “By arbitrarily and wrongly disallowed Registration u/s 12A/AA. 2. At the time of hearing, an adjournment application was moved on behalf of the assessee pleading for time on account of illness of the C.A. Considering the material available on ITA 326 /CHD/2020 A.Y. 2020-21 Page 2 of 5 record, the request seeking time was rejected. The reasons for the said decision as borne out from the record are that the appeal is spilling over from 17.01.2022 on which date the Department had sought an adjournment. On the said date, it had been noticed that relevant facts necessary for adjudication were considered to be not made available by the assessee. Paragraph 5 and 7 of the impugned order was read out. When the same was read alongwith paras 3 and 4 of the statement of facts, it appeared the documents were sent as attachments on e-mail. Accordingly, considering the departmental request, the adjournment request was accepted requiring the department to be ready to address their arguments on the next date. The facts as noticed and pointed out at the time of hearing on 17.01.2022 highlighted for the benefit of the department were that the application filed by the assessee seeking registration u/s 12AA was filed electronically on 28.02.2020 was considered by the CIT(E) Chandigarh wherein it was noticed that the assessee was an ongoing entity in operation since 31.03.2009. Accordingly, a questionnaire was issued to the assessee on various issues including the submissions on facts to address the activities and substantiate whether these were in alignment with the aims and objects of the Trust. In the response made available by the assessee, certain shortcomings were noticed by CIT (E) including shortcoming in paragraph 5 of the impugned ITA 326 /CHD/2020 A.Y. 2020-21 Page 3 of 5 order. These were read out for the benefit of the Department on 17.01.2022. The said para reads as under : “5. In response, the applicant has replied online on ITBA. On perusal of the reply of the applicant, the additional queries were sent to the applicant on 16.09.2020 and the applicant has replied online through email on 21.09.2020. On perusal of the reply,it is observed that the applicant society has not submitted the certified copy of MOA and bye-laws duly certified by competent authority. In the absence of certified copy of MOA, the genuineness of activities of the society cannot be corroborated with the stated aims and objects of the society.” (emphasis supplied) 3. It was pointed out that these reasons were repeated in para 7 of the impugned order also as a result of which the application moved ultimately stood rejected. In the Statement of facts filed by the assessee alongwith the Grounds in the appeal Memo it was seen that the following facts are stated : 3. In response, the reply was submitted online on ITBA within time frame given. On perusal of the reply the additional queries were received on 16.09.2020 and the reply was submitted online through email on 21.09.2020. 4. The application for registration was denied on 22.09.2020 vide notice number :ITBA/EXM/S/EXM1/2020-21/1028033566(1), on the ground stating that applicant has not submitted certified copy of MOA and bye-laws duly certified by competent authority & Non receipt of Audited Financial Statements. However Certified Copy Of MOA & Bye Laws was attached in the email through which reply was submitted on 21.09.2020. We were not required by law to get our accounts Audited hence we submitted unaudited financial statements alongwith aforementioned reply on 21.09.2020. (emphasis supplied) 4. Accordingly, it was noticed that apparently the copy of the MOA and Bye-laws stated to have been attached in the e-mail ITA 326 /CHD/2020 A.Y. 2020-21 Page 4 of 5 were possibly not received by the department and thus, since as per facts, the relevant documents are available with the assessee, it was deemed appropriate to remand the issue back. 5. Thus, on these lines, in order to grant time to the department to study the case in the appeal, it was adjourned to the next date i.e. 18.01.2022. 6. Accordingly, in view of these facts available on record, adjournment application moved by the assessee was rejected and the department was heard. 7. Mr. Sarabjit Singh, CIT-DR considering the material available on record had no objection in the facts and circumstances for remanding the matter back to the CIT (Exemptions). 8. Accordingly, after going through the above record, in the light of the above peculiar facts and circumstances, the impugned order is set aside back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) with the direction to pass an order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee in its own interests is directed to ensure that the relevant copies are made available and any other deficiencies on facts and submissions pointed out by the CIT(E) Chandigarh be complied with fully and fairly. The opportunity so made available, it is hoped is utilized fairly and fully by the assessee ITA 326 /CHD/2020 A.Y. 2020-21 Page 5 of 5 as in the eventuality of abuse of the trust reposed, it is made clear that the CIT(E) shall be at liberty to pass an order on the basis of material available on record. Said order was pronounced at the time of virtual hearing itself via Webex. 9. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 17 th February,2022. Sd/- Sd/- (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (DIVA SINGH) लेखा लेखालेखा लेखा सद瀡य सद瀡यसद瀡य सद瀡य/ Accountant Member 瀈याियक 瀈याियक瀈याियक 瀈याियक सद瀡य सद瀡यसद瀡य सद瀡य/ Judicial Member “Poonam” आदेश क琉 灹ितिलिप अ灡ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ牸/ The Appellant 2. 灹瀄यथ牸/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु猴/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु猴 (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. िवभागीय 灹ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च瀃डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड榁 फाईल/ Guard File आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar