The ACIT, (Exemptions), Circle-1, Ahmedabad V. State Examination Board, Gandhinagar

ITA 3271/AHD/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8229 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-05-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 06-12-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: VISHAL S VERMA A R; GEET MECWAN
• Keywords: Charitable institution; Deemed to accrue or arise in india
• Section: 12AA; 68; 63; 11; 139

Judgement Text

, ,LK ,LK,LK ,LK- -- -,E ,E,E ,E- -- -LH LHLH LH IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD OLHE VGEN] OLHE VGEN] OLHE VGEN] OLHE VGEN] YS[KK LNL; YS[KK LNL; YS[KK LNL; YS[KK LNL; , BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.3271/AHD/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) THE ACIT(EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE 1, AHMEDABAD. / VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD, NEAR GOVERNMENT LIBRARY, SECTOR 21, GANDHINAGAR 382 021 ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AACTS 9590 F ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( !' / RESPONDENT ) # / APPELLANT BY : SHRI PRASOON KABRA, SR. D.R. !' $ # / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI GEET MECWAN & VISHAL S. VERMA, A.R. % &' $ () / DATE OF HEARING 23/05/2018 *+,- $ () / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 31/05/2018 . / O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE APPELLATE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-GANDHINAGAR, AHMEDABAD [CIT(A) IN SHORT] VIDE APPEAL NO.CIT(A)/GNR/505/2015-16 DATED 29/09/2016 ARISING IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED UNDER S.143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS 'THE ACT') DATED 27/03/2015 RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2009-10. ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 2 - 2. THE GROUNDS RAISED BY THE REVENUE PER ITS APPEAL ARE AS UNDER: 1. WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE THE LD.CIT(A) IS JUSTIFIED IN ALLOWING THE ASSESSEES A PPEAL DELETING THE ADDITION OF RS.45,00,000/- BEING DEEMED INCOME. 2. WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE THE LD. CIT(A) IS JUSTIFIED IN HOLDING THAT THE APPELLANT H AS UTILIZED ACCUMULATED INCOME WITHIN THE PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS. 3. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, THE LD. CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE UPHELD THE ORDER OF THE AO. 4. IT IS, THEREFORE, PRAYED THAT THE ORDER OF THE L D. CIT(A) MAY BE SET ASIDE AND THAT OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER. 3. THE SOLITARY ISSUE RAISED BY THE REVENUE IN THIS APPEAL IS THAT LEARNED CIT(A) ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION MADE BY THE AO FOR RS.45,00,000/- UNDER PROVISION OF SECTION 11(3)(C) OF THE ACT. 4. THE BRIEFLY STATED FACTS ARE THAT THE ASSESSEE I N THE PRESENT CASE IS A TRUST AND ENGAGED IN THE ACTIVITY OF EDUCATION . THE ASSESSEE IN THE A.Y. 2003-04 ACCUMULATED A SUM OF RS.45,00,000/- U/ S 11(2) OF THE ACT BY WAY OF FILING FORM 10 FOR 5 YEARS WHICH IS ENDIN G ON FY 2007-08 CORRESPONDING TO AY 2008-09. THIS ACCUMULATED SUM W AS TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIXED ASSET AND/OR FOR ADJUSTME NT IN FEE STRUCTURE BEFORE 31-03-2008. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE UTILIZED T HE SAME IN THE F.Y. I.E. 2008-09 CORRESPONDING TO AY 2009-10 AFTER THE EXPIRY DATE I.E. 31.3.2008 (F.Y. 2007-08). THUS, THE ASSESSEE DURING THE YEAR TRANSFERRED A SU M OF RS.45,00,000/- FROM CAPITAL FUND ACCOUNT TO THE INCOME AND EXPENDI TURE ACCOUNT BUT CLAIMED DEDUCTION FOR THE SAME UNDER SECTION 11(3)( C) OF THE ACT. HOWEVER, THE AO WAS OF THE VIEW THAT THE AMOUNT TRA NSFERRED FROM ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 3 - CAPITAL FUND TO INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT FOR RS.45,00,000/- REPRESENTS THE DEEMED INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE AND TH EREFORE, SUCH DEEMED INCOME CANNOT BE ELIGIBLE U/S 11 OF THE ACT. BESIDES THE ABOVE, THE AO WAS ALSO OF THE VIEW THAT THE FUND ACCUMULATED WAS TO BE UTILIZED WITHIN 5 YEARS FROM THE A.Y. 2003-04 WHICH EXPIRED IN THE AY 2008-09. THUS ASSESSEE FAIL ED TO UTILIZE THE SAME WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME PERIOD I.E. F.Y. 200 7-08 CORRESPONDING TO A.Y. 2008-09. IN FACT, THE ASSESSEE HAS UTILIZED TH E ACCUMULATED FUND IN THE SUBSEQUENT FINANCIAL YEAR, WHICH IS UNDER CONSI DERATION I.E. 2008-09 CORRESPONDING TO A.Y. 2009-10. THUS, THE ASSESSEE F AILED TO COMPLY THE PROVISION OF SECTION 11(2) OF THE ACT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE REASONS THE AO SHOW-CAUSED THE ASSESSEE FOR ITS EXPLANATION. IN COMPLIANCE THERETO, THE ASSESSEE SU BMITTED THAT THE PROVISION OF SECTION 11(3)(C) OF THE ACT REQUIRES T O UTILIZE THE ACCUMULATED FUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED PERIOD OR IN THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXPIRY THEREOF. IN THE INSTANCE CASE, THE FUND WAS ACCUMULATED FOR 5 YEARS, WHICH CAME TO THE END IN T HE F.Y. 2007-08 CORRESPONDING TO A.Y. 2008-09 BUT THE ACCUMULATED F UND WAS UTILIZED FOR THE SPECIFIED PURPOSES IMMEDIATELY IN THE NEXT FINA NCIAL YEAR AS PERMITTED UNDER CLAUSE (C) OF SECTION 11(3) OF THE ACT. HOWEVER, THE AO DISREGARDED THE CONTENTION OF THE A SSESSEE ON ACCOUNT OF TWO REASONS, FIRSTLY, TRANSFER OF RS.45,00,000/- FROM CAPITAL FUND TO THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT REPRESENTS THE DEEME D INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE AND THEREFORE, IT IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR DEDU CTION U/S 11 OF THE ACT. ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 4 - SECONDLY, THE FUND ACCUMULATED SET APART WAS NOT UT ILIZED WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME I.E. 5 YEARS. ACCORDINGLY, THE AO TR EATED THE SUM OF RS.45,00,000/- AS DEEMED INCOME AND ADDED TO THE TO TAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. 5. AGGRIEVE, ASSESSEE PREFERRED AN APPEAL TO LD. CI T(A). THE ASSESSEE BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A) SUBMITTED THAT FUND ACCUMULATED U/S 11(2) OF THE ACT WAS UTILIZED FOR SPECIFIED PURPOSE S. THE ASSESSEE WAS TO UTILIZE SUCH FUND UP TO 31-03-2008 BUT THE SAME WAS UTILIZED IN THE IMMEDIATE NEXT YEAR I.E. 31-03-2009 CORRESPONDING T O AY 2009-10, WHICH HAS BEEN PERMITTED UNDER CLAUSE (C) OF SECTIO N 11(3) OF THE ACT. THE LD. CIT(A) AFTER CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSION OF THE ASSESSEE DELETED THE ADDITION MADE BY THE AO BY OBSERVING AS UNDER: I HAVE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE FACTS OF THE CASE, ASSESSMENT ORDER AND SUBMISSION FILED BY THE APPELLANT. THE UNDISPUTED F ACTS OF PRESENT APPEAL IS THAT APPELLANT HAS SHOWN TOTAL INCOME IN PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT AT RS.5,75,81,017/- WHICH INCLUDES RS.45,00 ,000/- BEING AMOUNT ACCUMULATED IN A.Y. 2003-04 AND TRANSFER FRO M CAPITAL FUND IN CURRENT YEAR. THUS, NET TOTAL INCOME FOR THE CURREN T YEAR IS RS.5,30,81,017/-. THE APPELLANT HAS SUBMITTED COMPU TATION OF TOTAL INCOME WHEREIN IT IS STATED THAT EXEMPTION UNDER SE CTION 11 BEING 15% OF INCOME IS AT RS.78,02,738/-. FURTHER, TOTAL EXPE NSES IN PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT IS OF RS.3,12,78,279/- OUT OF WHICH RS.43,3 5,054/- IS CLAIMED AGAINST ACCUMULATION MADE FOR EARLIER YEARS. THE AP PELLANT HAS ALSO CLAIMED ACCUMULATION UNDER SECTION 11(2) FOR RS.1,8 5,00,000/-. THUS, APPELLANT CLAIMED TOTAL EXPENSES EITHER CLAIMED UND ER SECTION 11 OR 11(2) IS OF RS.5,32,45,963/- (78,02,738 + 3,12,78,2 79 + 1,85,00,000 - 43,35,054) AND SUCH AMOUNT IS CLAIMED AGAINST NET T OTAL INCOME OF RS.5,30,81,017/- AND THUS, INCOME WAS SHOWN AT NIL. THE APPELLANT HAS ALSO CLAIMED THAT AMOUNT ACCUMULATED IN AY 2003-04 WAS OF RS.45,00,000/- AND SUCH AMOUNT IS TO BE USED FOR FE ES ADJUSTMENT AND PURCHASE OF FIXED ASSETS OR FOR FEES ADJUSTMENT AND IT HAS UTILIZED RS.1,64,946/- TOWARDS PURCHASE OF FIXED ASSETS IN A Y 2009-10 AND ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 5 - RS.43,35,054/- FOR FEE ADJUSTMENT IN VERY SAME YEAR . THUS, APPELLANT HAS CLAIMED THAT ENTIRE ACCUMULATED INCOME OF AY 20 03-04 WAS UTILIZED IN CURRENT YEAR. HOWEVER, THE AO HAS REFERRED TO PR OVISIONS OF SECTION 11(2) AND 11(3) AND CONTENDED THAT WHEN 85% OF INCO ME OF TRUST UNDER SECTION 11(1) IS NOT APPLIED FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSE BUT IS ACCUMULATED EITHER IN WHOLE OR PART, SUCH INCOME SHALL NOT BE D EEMED TO BE THE TOTAL INCOME OF PREVIOUS YEAR IN RECEIPT OF INCOME IF APP ELLANTS SUBMITS FORM 10 SPECIFYING THE PURPOSE OF ACCUMULATION. THE AO H AS STATED THAT AMOUNT SET APART OR ACCUMULATED IS REQUIRED TO BE U SED WITHIN FIVE YEARS. THE AO HAS ALSO REFERRED TO PROVISION OF SEC TION 11(3) AND CONTENDED THAT IF AMOUNT APPLIED U/S 11(2) IS NOT U TILIZED FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS ACCUMULATED WITHIN PRESCRIB ED PERIOD, IT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE THE INCOME OF APPELLANT FOR PREVIOUS Y EAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXPIRY OF PERIOD. ON THIS BASIS, AO C ONTENDED THAT APPELLANT HAS ACCUMULATED INCOME IN AY 2003-04 AND IS REQUIRED TO BE UTILIZED UPTO AY 2008-09 WHICH APPELLANT FAILED TO UTILIZE, HENCE, HE HAS TAXED RS.45,00,000/- AS DEEMED INCOME IN CURRENT AS SESSMENT YEAR. ON THE OTHER HAND, APPELLANT HAS REITERATED THE CONTEN TION AS RAISED BEFORE THE AO AND ARGUED THAT AMOUNT WAS UTILIZED AFTER TH E EXPIRY OF SAID FIVE YEARS BUT WAS UTILIZED IN THE IMMEDIATE YEAR AFTER THE EXPIRY OF SAID PERIOD AND AS PER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(3)(C) RS .45,00,000/- CANNOT BE TREATED AS DEEMED INCOME OF APPELLANT. ON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF ENTIRE FACTS, IT IS PER TINENT TO NOTE THAT PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(2) AND 11(3) READ AS UNDER : '[(2) 2[WHERE 3[EIGHTY-FIVE] PER CENT OF THE INCOME REFERRED TO IN CLAUSE (A) OR V CLAUSE (B) OF SUB-SECTION (1) READ WITH THE EXPLANATION TO THAT SUB-SECTION IS NOT APPLIED, OR IS NOT DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN APPLIED, TO CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PU RPOSES IN INDIA DURING THE PREVIOUS YEAR BUT IS ACCUMULATED OR SET APART, EITHER IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR APPLICATION TO SUCH PURPOS ES IN INDIA, SUCH INCOME SO ACCUMULATED OR SET APART SHALL NOT B E INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE PREVIOUS YEAR OF THE PERSON IN RECEIPT OF THE INCOME, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE C OMPLIED WITH, NAMELY:] [(A) SUCH PERSON FURNISHES A STATEMENT IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM AND IN THE PRESCRIBED 5 MANNER 6 TO THE ASSESSING O FFICER, STATING THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE INCOME IS BEING ACCUMULATED OR SET APART AND THE PERIOD FOR WHICH THE INCOME IS TO BE ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 6 - ACCUMULATED OR SET APART, WHICH SHALL IN NO CASE EX CEED FIVE YEARS; (B) THE MONEY SO ACCUMULATED 6 OR SET APART IS INVE STED OR DEPOSITED IN THE FORMS OR MODES SPECIFIED IN SUB-SE CTION (5); (C) THE STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN CLAUSE (A) IS FURN ISHED ON OR BEFORE THE DUE DATE SPECIFIED UNDER SUB-SECTION (1) OF SECTION 139 FOR FURNISHING THE RETURN OF INCOME FOR THE PREVIOUS YEAR. PROVIDED THAT IN COMPUTING THE PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS REFERRED TO IN CLAUSE (A), THE PERIOD DURING WHICH THE INCOME COUL D NOT BE APPLIED FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS SO ACCUMULA TED OR SET APART, DUE TO AN ORDER OR INJUNCTION OF ANY COURT, SHALL BE EXCLUDED.] 7[EXPLANATION ANY AMOUNT CREDITED OR PAID, OUT OF INCOME REFERRED TO IN CLAUSE (A) OR CLAUSE (B) OF SUB-SECT ION (1), READ WITH THE EXPLANATION TO THAT SUBSECTION, WHICH IS N OT APPLIED, BUT IS ACCUMULATED OR SET APART, TO ANY TRUST OR INSTIT UTION REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12AA OR TO ANY FUND OR INSTITUTION OR TRUST OR ANY UNIVERSITY OR OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OR ANY HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL INSTITUTION REFERRED TO IN SUB-CLAUSE (IV) OR SUB- CLAUSE (V) OR SUB-CLAUSE (VI) OR SUB-CLAUSE (VIA) O F CLAUSE (23C) OF SECTION 10, SHALL NOT BE TREATED AS APPLICATION OF INCOME FOR CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES, EITHER DURING THE PERIOD OF ACCUMULATION OR THEREAFTER.] [ANY INCOME REFERRED TO IN SUB-SECTION (2) WHICH - (A) IS APPLIED TO PURPOSES OTHER THAN CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES AS AFORESAID OR CEASES TO BE ACCUMULATED O R SET APART FOR APPLICATION THERETO, OR (B) CEASES TO REMAIN INVESTED OR DEPOSITED IN ANY OF TH E FORMS OR MODES SPECIFIED IN SUB SECTION (5), OR] (C) IS NOT UTILIZED10 FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS SO ACCUMULATED OR SET APART DURING THE PERIOD REFERRED TO IN CLAUSE (A) OF THAT SUB-SECTION OR IN THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXPIRY THEREOF, 11[(D) IS CREDITED OR PAID TO ANY TRUST OR INSTITUT ION REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12AA OR TO ANY FUND OR INSTITUTION OR TRUST ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 7 - OR ANY UNIVERSITY OR OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OR ANY HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL INSTITUTION REFERRED TO I N SUB- CLAUSE (IV) OR SUB-CLAUSE (V) OR SUB-CLAUSE (VI} OR SUB- CLAUSE (VIA) OF CLAUSE (23C) OF SECTION 10,]' THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(2)(A) CLEARLY STATES T HAT ASSESSEE CAN ACCUMULATE OR SET APART INCOME OF C URRENT YEAR FOR UTILIZATION SUBSEQUENT ASSESSMENT YEARS WHICH SHOUL D NOT EXCEED FIVE YEARS, PRESENT CASE, APPELLANT HAS ACCUMULATED INCO ME IN A.Y. 2003-04 FOR FIVE YEARS WHICH EXPIRES ON 31 ST MARCH, 2008. THE AO HAS NOT DISPUTED THE FACT THAT APPELLANT HAS NOT FILED PRE SCRIBED FORM FOR ACCUMULATION. FURTHER, PROVISION OF SECTION 11(3)(C ) STATES THAT ANY INCOME REFERRED SECTION 11(2) IF IT IS NOT UTILIZED FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS ACCUMULATED IN PERIOD OF FIVE YE ARS AS REFERRED IN SECTION 11(2)(A) OR IN THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWI NG THE EXPIRY, IT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE INCOME OF APPELLANT ON EXPIRY OF FI VE YEARS, IN THE PRESENT CASE APPELLANT HAS UTILIZED ACCUMULATED INC OME IN A.Y. 2009-10 AND AO HAS NOT DENIED THE FACT THAT SAME IS NOT USE D FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT WAS ACCUMULATED. THE ONLY DISPUTE IS REGAR DING THE YEAR OF UTILIZATION AS AO IS OF THE VIEW THAT ACCUMULATED I NCOME IS REQUIRED UPTO 31 ST MARCH, 2008, WHEREAS APPELLANT IS OF THE VIEW THAT ACCUMULATION IS REQUIRED TO BE USED UPTO 31/03/2009 . THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(3)(C) AS DISCUSSED HEREIN ABOVE CLEARLY STATES THAT ACCUMULATED INCOME CAN BE DEEMED INCOME ONLY IF IT IS NOT USED WITHIN PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS OR THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW ING THE EXPIRY AND IN PRESENT CASE APPELLANT HAS ALREADY UTILIZED ACCUMUL ATED INCOME IN THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXPIRY BEING A.Y. 20 09-10 AND SUCH UTILIZATION IS AS PER PROVISIONS OF THE LAW, HENCE, AO WAS NOT JUSTIFIED IN TREATING INCOME OF RS.45,00,000/- AS DEEMED INCO ME U/S 11(3) OF THE ACT. THIS GROUND OF APPEAL IS ALLOWED. BEING AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A) REVENUE IS IN SECOND APPEAL BEFORE US. BOTH LD. DR AND AR BEFORE US RELIED ON T HE ORDER OF AUTHORITIES BELOW AS FAVORABLE TO THEM. 6. WE HAVE HEARD RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IN THE INSTANCE CASE, THE ASSE SSEE HAS ACCUMULATED A ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 8 - SUM OF RS.45,00,000/- IN THE A.Y. 2003-04, WHICH WA S TO BE UTILIZED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF 5 YEARS I.E. 31-03-2008 FOR TH E SPECIFIED PURPOSES. BUT THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO UTILIZE THE SAME WITHIN THE PERIOD OF 5 YEARS THEREFORE, THE SAME WAS TREATED AS DEEMED INCOME BY THE AO ON ACCOUNT OF TWO REASONS AS DISCUSSED BELOW: I. TRANSFER OF RS.45,00,000/- FROM CAPITAL FUND ACCOUN T TO INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT REPRESENTS THE DEEMED INCOM E OF THE ASSESSEE THEREFORE, SAME CANNOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR DED UCTION U/S 11 OF THE ACT. II. THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO UTILIZE THE FUND ACCUMULATED WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME. AT IN THIS JUNCTURE, WE FIND IMPORTANT TO REPRODUCE THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE SECTION 11 OF THE ACT, WHICH READS AS UNDER: 46 INCOME 47 FROM PROPERTY HELD FOR CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PUR POSES. 48 11. (1) SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 60 TO 63 , THE FOLLOWING INCOME SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE PR EVIOUS YEAR OF THE PERSON IN RECEIPT OF THE INCOME 49 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 61 [(2) 62 [WHERE 63 [EIGHTY-FIVE] PER CENT OF THE INCOME REFERRED TO IN CLAUSE (A) OR CLAUSE (B) OF SUB-SECTION (1) READ WITH THE EXPL ANATION TO THAT SUB-SECTION IS NOT APPLIED, OR IS NOT DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN APPLI ED, TO CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES IN INDIA DURING THE PREVIOUS YEA R BUT IS ACCUMULATED OR SET APART, EITHER IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR APPLICATION TO SUCH PURPOSES IN INDIA, SUCH INCOME SO ACCUMULATED OR SET APART SHALL NOT B E INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE PREVIOUS YEAR OF THE PERSON IN RECEIP T OF THE INCOME, PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE COMPLIED WITH, NAMELY: ] (A) SUCH PERSON SPECIFIES, BY NOTICE IN WRITING GIVEN TO THE 64 [ASSESSING] OFFICER IN THE PRESCRIBED 65 MANNER 66 , THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE INCOME IS BEING ACCUMULATED OR SET APART AND THE PERIOD FOR W HICH THE INCOME IS TO BE ACCUMULATED OR SET APART, WHICH SHALL IN NO CASE EX CEED TEN YEARS; 67 [(B) THE MONEY SO ACCUMULATED 68 OR SET APART IS INVESTED OR DEPOSITED IN THE FORMS OR MODES SPECIFIED IN SUB-SECTION (5)]:] ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 9 - THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(2) OF THE ACT CLEARLY AUTHORIZE THE ASSESSEE TO ACCUMULATE THE FUND FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR THE SPECIFIED PERIOD. IN CASE ON HAND THERE IS NO ALLEGATION OF THE AO TH AT THE FUND ACCUMULATED HAS BEEN UTILIZED OTHER THAN THE PURPOS E FOR WHICH IT WAS ACCUMULATED. THEREFORE, IT CAN BE INFERRED THAT THE FUND ACCUMULATED HAS BEEN UTILIZED FOR THE SPECIFIED PURPOSES. THEREFORE , THERE IS NO QUESTION OF TREATING THE DEEMED INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE AND THER EFORE, WE HOLD THAT THE AO ERRED IN TREATING THE INCOME TRANSFER FROM C APITAL FUND ACCOUNT TO THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT AS DEEMED INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. SIMILARLY, WE ALSO NOTE THAT INDEED ASSESSEE WAS TO UTILIZE THE FUND WITHIN THE PERIOD OF 5 YEARS, WHICH ENDED ON 31-03-2008 BU T THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO DO SO AND UTILIZED THE SAME FOR SPECIFIED PURPOS E IN THE IMMEDIATE SUCCEEDING FINANCIAL YEAR. IN THIS REGARD, WE NOTE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(3) OF THE ACT CLEARLY PERMITS TO UTILIZ E THE FUNDS EITHER WITHIN THE SPECIFIED PERIOD OR IN THE NEXT YEAR IMM EDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXPIRY OF THE PERIOD AS DISCUSSED ABOVE. THE RELEVA NT EXTRACT OF THE SECTION READS AS UNDER : 72 [(3) ANY INCOME REFERRED TO IN SUB-SECTION (2) WHIC H (A) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 73 [(B) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (C) IS NOT UTILISED 74 FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS SO ACCUMULATED OR SET APART DURING THE PERIOD REFERRED TO IN CLAUSE (A) O F THAT SUB-SECTION OR IN THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXPIRY THEREOF IT IS UNDISPUTED FACT THAT THE FUND WAS UTILIZED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE SPECIFIED PURPOSE IN THE PREVIOUS YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXPIRY ITA NO.3271/AHD/2016 ACIT (EXEMPTION ) VS. STATE EXAMINATION BOARD ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 10 - OF THE YEAR UPTO WHICH THE FUND WAS ACCUMULATED. TH EREFORE, THERE REMAINS NO DOUBT THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS ENTITLED FOR CLAIMING THE DEDUCTION U/S 11 OF THE ACT. THUS, WE DO NOT FIND A NY REASON TO INTERFERE IN THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A) AND HENCE GROUND OF APPE AL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. 7. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSE D. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 31/05/2018 SD/- SD/- JKTIKY ;KNO JKTIKY ;KNO JKTIKY ;KNO JKTIKY ;KNO OLHE VGEN OLHE VGEN OLHE VGEN OLHE VGEN U;KF;D LNL; U;KF;D LNL; U;KF;D LNL; U;KF;D LNL; YKS[KK LN YKS[KK LN YKS[KK LN YKS[KK LN L; L; L; L; (RAJPAL YADAV) (WASEEM AHMED) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 31/05/2018 PRITI YADAV, SR.PS !'# $#! / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. !' / THE RESPONDENT. 3. /01( % 2( / CONCERNED CIT 4. % 2( ( ) / THE CIT(A)-GANDHINAGAR, AHMEDABAD. 5. 567 !(&01 , ) 01- , 8 / / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 79 :' / GUARD FILE. % & / BY ORDER, ' 5( !( //TRUE COPY// '/& () ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD