M/s. Shankarlal Gordhandas & Sons, Baroda V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Baroda

ITA 3293/AHD/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4688 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 year(s) 2 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2020
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 10-12-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 15

Judgement Text

, B IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD ( CONVENED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT ) BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER S.NO APPEAL A.Y. APPELLANT (PAN NO.) RESPONDENT A.R. 1 ITA NO. 3293 /AHD/2014 2008-09 M/S. SHANKARLAL GORDHANDAS & SONS (AAHFS1947B) ITO, WARD - 3(2), BARODA SHRI MANISH SHAH 2 ITA NO.2090/ AHD/2015 2009-10 SHRI PRAFULCHANDRA J. AGRAWAL (AABPA3656P) ACIT, RANGE - 9, FIRST FLOOR, PRATYAKSH KAR BHAVAN, PANJARA POLE, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD - 15 SHRI S. N. DIVATIA 3 ITA NO.1546/ AHD/2018 2009-10 SHRI PRAFULCHANDRA J. AGRAWAL (AABPA3656P) ITO, WARD - 3(3)(4), 5 TH FLOOR, PRATYAKSH KAR BHAVAN, PANJARA POLE, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD SHRI S. N. DIVATIA REVENUE BY : SHRI R. R. MAKWANA, SR. D.R. / DATE OF HEARING 21/01/2021 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12/02/2021 / O R D E R PER BENCH : THE CAPTIONED THREE APPEALS ARISE FROM THE RESPECTI VE ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) (CIT(A)) AGA INST DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT YEARS. ITA NOS. 3293/AHD/14 & 2 ORS. - 2 - 2. THE CAPTIONED ASSESSEES HAVE SOUGHT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS LISTED ABOVE ON THE GROUND THAT THEY HAVE OPTED TO AVAIL B ENEFITS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 (VSV). WHEN THE MATTER WAS C ALLED FOR HEARING, THE LD. COUNSELS FOR THE ASSESSEE AT THE OUTSET HAV E SUBMITTED THAT THEY DO NOT SEEK TO PURSUE THE SAID APPEALS OWING TO EXERCI SE OF OPTION FOR AVAILING VSV SCHEME AND CONSEQUENTLY REQUESTED THAT THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEALS MAY PLEASE BE GRANTED. R EFERENCE WAS ALSO MADE TO WRITTEN REQUESTS IN THIS REGARD. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVE NUE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IN THE CIR CUMSTANCES NARRATED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN THE LIGHT OF ORAL/WRITTEN REQUESTS MADE ON BE HALF OF THE CAPTIONED PARTIES, ALL THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, IN THE EVENT, THE ASSESSEE FAILS TO AVAIL THE BENEF IT OF VSV SCHEME FOR ANY BONAFIDE REASONS, THEN THE ASSESSEE CONCERNED W ILL BE AT LIBERTY TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ORIGINAL APPEALS FOR HEARING BE FORE ITAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 5. IN THE RESULT, ALL CAPTIONED APPEALS ARE DISMISS ED AS WITHDRAWN. SD/- SD/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMAR K EDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 12/02/2021 TRUE COPY S. K. SINHA / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- / REVENUE 2 / ASSESSEE ! ! ' / CONCERNED CIT 4 ! ! '- / CIT (A) )*+,!-.. / ! ! /01 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 12/02/2021 ITA NOS. 3293/AHD/14 & 2 ORS. - 3 - 2,3456 / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / / /0! ! ! /01