IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH E, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NOS.330 & 331/M/2020 ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/S. SAHAJ ANKUR DEVELOPERS, B-301, SORRENTO BUILDING, BESANT ROAD, SANTACRUZ (W), MUMBAI 400 054 PAN: ABWFS2944L VS. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), ROOM NO.1915, 19 TH FLOOR, AIR INDIA BUILDING, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI)- 400 021 (APPELLANT) (RE SPONDENT) PRESENT FOR: ASSESSEE BY : MS. NAMRATA KASALE, A.R. REVENUE BY : SHRI VIJAY KUMAR MENON, D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 24.06.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 24.06.2021 O R D E R PER RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE ABOVE TITLED APPEALS HAVE BEEN PREFERRED BY TH E ASSESSEE AGAINST DIFFERENT ORDERS DATED 25.10.2019 & 28.10.2019 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEA LS) [HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE CIT(A)] RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2011-12 & 2012-13 RESPECTIVELY. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE B ROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE BENCH THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS GONE INTO VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND FORM NO.3 HAS ALREADY BEEN ISSUED . THE LD. A.R., THEREFORE, PRAYED BEFORE THE BENCH THAT A PPEALS MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ITA NOS.330 & 331/M/2020 M/S. SAHAJ ANKUR DEVELOPERS 2 3. THE LD. D.R. FAIRLY CONCEDED TO THE WITHDRAWAL O F THE APPEALS. 4. ACCORDINGLY, WE ARE INCLINED TO DISMISS THE APPE ALS OF THE ASSESSEE. 5. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24.06.2021. SD/- SD/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) (RAJESH KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED: 24.06.2021. * KISHORE, SR. P.S. COPY TO: THE APPELLANT THE RESPONDENT THE CIT, CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE CIT (A) CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE DR CONCERNED BENCH //TRUE COPY// [ BY ORD ER DY /ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI.