PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH - SMC, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 343/DEL/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR. 2012-13 VANEETA NARANG VS. ITO E-36/305, JAWAHAR PARK WARD-43 (4) LAXMI NAGAR DELHI 110 092 NEW DELHI. PAN ADVPN6318A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. BEDOBANI, SR. D R PER BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ORDER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF LD.CIT(A)- 15, NEW DELHI DT. 27.10.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTI FYING THE DATE OF HEARING THROUGH REGISTERED POST. IT APPEARED ASSESS EE IS NO MORE INTEREST IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE THE A PPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE P ROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RUL ES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA ) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP) , I DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO A DVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS OR DER AND EXPLAINING THE ITA NO. 343/DEL/2017 VANEETA NARANAG VS. ITO PAGE 2 OF 2 REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED . 4. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT O N THE DATE OF HEARING ITSELF I.E. ON 2 ND MAY, 2017. SD/- ( BHAVNESH SAINI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 2 ND MAY, 2017 *VEENA* COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. PRINCIPAL CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR