Vinod Jain, Delhi V. ITO WARD- 36(1), New Delhi

ITA 3434/DEL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3103 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 4 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-08-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 21-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI C.M. GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.3434/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Vinod Jain, T-73, Jain Colony, Uttam Nagar, West Delhi, New Delhi. PAN: AJVPJ7467J Vs. ITO, Ward-36(1), New Delhi. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri V. Rajakumar, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 23.08.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 26.08.2022 ORDER PER C.M. GARG, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 10.12.2018 of the CIT(A)-12, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee read as under:- “On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the following actions of the Ld. CIT (Appeals) are most arbitrary, erroneous and untenable in: i. deciding the appeal against the assessee without providing due, reasonable and adequate opportunity of hearing; ITA No.3434/Del/2019 2 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 26.08.2022. Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (C.M. GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 26 th August, 2022. dk Copy forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi