, .. , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , SMC B BENCH, CHENNAI . , ! BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.360/MDS/2017 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10) SMT. L. RAJAM, NO.77/2, BLOCK-W, 1 ST STREET, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI 600 040. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BUSINESS WARD XIV(1), CHENNAI PAN: AGEPR3811L ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SUPRIYOPAL, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 13.06.2017 ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13.06.2017 / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEA LS)-7, CHENNAI DATED 31.05.2016 IN ITA NO.44/CIT(A)-7/2011 -12 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 PASSED U/S.250(6) R.W.S.143 (3) OF THE ACT. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD INTIMATIN G THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 13 .06.2017. HOWEVER, ON 13.06.2017, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE 2 ITA NO.360/MDS/2017 ASSESSEE, NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS RECEI VED. FURTHER THE APPEAL IS BARRED BY 189 DAYS AND CONDONATION PE TITION IS ALSO NOT FILED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, IM OF THE CONSIDERED OP INION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COU RT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), I DISM ISS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. THE REGISTRY IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO DISP ATCH THIS ORDER TO THE ASSESSEE WITHIN A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS FROM THIS DA Y. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 13 TH JUNE, 2017. SD/- ( . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER '# /CHENNAI, $% /DATED 13 TH JUNE, 2017 JR % '( )( /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. , ( )/CIT(A) 4. , /CIT 5. (-. / /DR 6. .0 /GF