SOS Kinderdorf International, Delhi V. DIT(E), Delhi

ITA 3654/DEL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: 365420114 RSA 2010
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-01-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 18-01-2012
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 30-07-2010
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S MOHANTHY
• Section: 12A

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G: NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.NO.3654/DEL/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR : N.A. SOS KINDERDORF INTERNATIONAL, DIRECTOR OF INCOME-T AX (EXEMPTIONS), 101, LAWYER CHAMBER BLOCK, VS. DELHI. DELHI HIGH COURT, DELHI. PAN: AANCS5212Q (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. S. MOHANTHY, D R O R D E R PER K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI, PASSED UNDER SEC. 1 2AA(1)(B) READ WITH SEC. 12A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT). 2. THIS CASE WAS INITIALLY FIXED FOR HEARING ON 30. 09.2010 AND ON THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUNSEL THE CASE WAS ADJO URNED TO 30.11.2010. THE BENCH DID NOT FUNCTION ON 30.11.2010 AND THEN THE C ASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 15.02.2011. AGAIN, ON THE REQUEST OF AS SESSEES COUNSEL THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 6.07.2011. SINCE THE BENCH DID NO T FUNCTION ON 6.07.2011, THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 18.01.2012, FOR WHICH NOT ICE OF HEARING WAS 2 ISSUED ON 16.11.2011 AT THE ASSESSEES ADDRESS GIVE N IN COLUMN 10 OF FORM NO.36. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BE HALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS PLACED BEFORE T HE BENCH. MS. S. MOHANTHY, SR. DR APPEARED FOR THE REVENUE. 4. FROM THE ABOVE, IT IS EVIDENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE PROSECUTION OF THIS APPEAL. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX AP PELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. M ULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 I TR 480 (MP), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSE SSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENC H IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASON ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 5. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT O N 18 TH JANUARY, 2012. SD/- SD/- (DIVA SINGH) (K.D. RANJAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 18 TH JANUARY, 2012. 3 ITA NO.3654/DEL/2010 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR BY ORDER *MG DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT.