SHRI GHANSHYAM SHARMA, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2-3, JAIPUR

ITA 377/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6921 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-04-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 19-03-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA - @ ITA NO. 377/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 SHRI GHANSHYAM SHARMA E-5, NARVARPURI COLONY, OPPOSITE JAINIYON KI NASIYON, OUTSIDE GANGAPOLE, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO. ADVPS9366B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING: 26/03/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 01/04/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 22/01/2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- KINDLY REFER TO THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FIXED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE HONBLE BENCH ON 26/03/2021. ITA NO. 377/JP/2019 SHRI GHANSHYAM SHARMA VS. ITO 2 IN THE MATTER, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT FORM 3 IS ISSUED BY THE CIT IN RESPONSE TO APPLICATION IN FORM 1 & 2 UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME BY THE ASSESSEE, COPY OF FORM 3 ENCLOSED. IT IS THEREFORE, HUMBLY REQUESTED TO PLEASE ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL. INCONVENIENCE CAUSED IS EXTREMELY REGRETTED. THANKING YOU, YOURS FAITHFULLY, (MANISH AGARWAL) A/R 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 01/04/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 01/04/2021. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI GHANSHYAM SHARMA, JAIPUR. ITA NO. 377/JP/2019 SHRI GHANSHYAM SHARMA VS. ITO 3 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 377/JP/2019} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR