M/s Sri Lalitha Enterprises, Hyderabad V. THE CIT(CENTRAL), Hyderabad

ITA 381/VIZ/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2122 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-02-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 29-05-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A ARUNA SHRI G V N HARI; BHUPAL REDDY
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

ITA NOS.376 TO 384/VIZAG/2013 M/S. SRI LALITHA ENTERPRISES, PEDDAPURAM 1 , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM . , . , $ BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./I.T.A.NOS.376 TO 381/VIZAG/2013 / ASSESSMENT YEARS: (2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009 -10 RESPECTIVELY) M/S. SRI LALITHA ENTERPRISES PEDDAPURAM VS. CIT CENTRAL HYDERABAD [PAN : ABIFS 3078D ] ( % / APPELLANT) ( &'% / RESPONDENT) ./I.T.A.NOS.382 TO 384/VIZAG/2013 / ASSESSMENT YEARS: (2005-06, 2006-07 & 2009-10 RESPECTIVELY) M/S . SRI LALITHA ENTERPRISES INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. PEDDAPURAM VS. CIT CENTRAL HYDERABAD [PAN: AAKCS3233N ] ( % / APPELLANT) ( &'% / RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : SMT. A. ARUNA, FOR SHRI G.V.N. HARI, AR / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI BHUPAL REDDY, DR / DATE OF HEARING : 03.02.2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03.02.2016 ITA NOS.376 TO 384/VIZAG/2013 M/S. SRI LALITHA ENTERPRISES, PEDDAPURAM 2 / O R D E R PER BENCH: THESE 9 APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEES ARE DIRECTE D AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(CENTRAL), HYDERABAD DATED 28.3.2013 FO R THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008- 09, 2009-10 AND 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2009-10 RESPECTI VELY. 2. WHEN THESE APPEALS ARE CALLED FOR HEARING, THE LD . COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT CONSEQUENT TO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER U/S 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 NO ADDITION IS MADE BY THE A.O. AND REQUESTED THAT SHE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS. 3. THE LD. D.R. HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION. 4. THUS, THESE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED . 5. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSE SSEES ARE DISMISSED . THE ABOVE ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 3 RD FEB16. SD/- SD/- ( . ) ( . ) (G. MANJUNATHA) (V. DURGA RAO) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER ! /VISAKHAPATNAM: % /DATED : 3.2.2016 VG/SPS ITA NOS.376 TO 384/VIZAG/2013 M/S. SRI LALITHA ENTERPRISES, PEDDAPURAM 3 '! (! /COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / THE APPELLANT M/S. SRI LALITHA ENTERPRISES, C/ O DR.C.P. RAMASWAMI, ADVOCATE, FLAT NOS.102&303, GITANJALI APTS., PLOT N O.108, SRI NAGAR COLONY, HYDERABAD 2. / THE RESPONDENT CIT (CENTRAL), HYDERABAD 3. ) / THE CIT, RAJAHMUNDRY 4. ) ( ) / THE CIT(A), RAJAHMUNDRY 5. ! , , , , ! / DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM 6 . / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // /0 , (SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY) , , ! / ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM