CONWOOD REALITY PVT. LTD., MUMBAI V. DCIT 12(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 3830/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1393 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-08-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 31-05-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: CHOUDHARY ARUNKUMAR SINGH
• Keywords: Revised return; Set aside
• Section: 143(3); 142(1); 14A; 250; 143(2); 68

Judgement Text

1 ITA 3830/MUM/2018 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH C, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI PAWAN SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA NO. 3830/MUM/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14) CONWOOD REALITY PVT LTD YASHODHAM, D.B. HOUSE GEN A.K. VAIDYA MARG GOREGAON (E), MUMBAI-400 063 PAN :AADC2510Q VS THE DY.CIT-12(1)(2), MUMBAI APPELLANT RESPONDEDNT APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI CHOUDHARY ARUNKUMAR SINGH DATE OF HEARING 27-08-2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 30-08-2019 O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JM : THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE OR DER OF CIT(A)-20, MUMBAI DATED 29-03-2018, WHICH IN TURN ARISES FROM ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31-03-2016 PASSED U/S 143(3) FOR AY 2013-14. THE A SSESSEE HAS RAISED THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS OF APPEAL:- THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS OF APPEAL ARE WITHOUT PREJUD ICE TO ONE ANOTHER;- 1. THE CIT(A) ERRED IN REJECTING THE APPEAL SINCE THE APPEAL WAS FILED MANUALLY IN PAPER FORM ON 28.04.2016 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2016 PA SSED UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 BY TH E DCIT 12(1)(2), MUMBAI. 2 ITA 3830/MUM/2018 2. IT WAS FURTHER STATED THAT SINCE THE APPEAL W AS FILED AFTER 01.03.2016 HENCE AS PER THE NOTIFICATION NO. S.O.637(E) DATED 1 ST MARCH,2016 ISSUED BY CBDT, NEW DELHI, MANDATES COMPULSORY E-FILING OF APPEALS. THE HONORABLE GT (A )-20 ALSO MENTIONED THAT AJETTER DATED 22.03.2018 WAS ISSUED ASKING THE APPELLANT TO SUBMI T A REPLY BY 28.03.2018 WHY THIS MANUALLY FILED APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE TREATED VOID AB INITIO. 3. THE APPELLANT HUMBLY STATES THAT THE ABOVE LET TER AS MENTIONED BY THE CIT(A)-20 ISSUED ON 22.03.2018 WAS NOT RECEIVED BY THEM & HENCE PRAY S THAT THIS ORDER BE SET ASIDE & THE APPELLANT BE GIVEN A WEEK TO E-FILE THE APPEAL. 2. THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE THAT ASSESSEE IS A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF REAL ESTATE DEVE LOPMENT, FILED ITS RETURN OF INCOME FOR AY 2013-14 ON 30-10-2013 DECLARING TO TAL INCOME AT A LOSS OF RS.17.59 CRORES. SUBSEQUENTLY REVISED RETURN WA S FILED ON 31-03-2015 REVISING THE TOTAL LOSS TO RS.3.68 CRORES. THE RET URN OF INCOME WAS SELECTED FOR SCRUTINY. THE AO, AFTER SERVING STATUTORY NOTI CES U/S 143(2) AND 142(1) COMPLETED THE ASSESSMENT U/S 143(3) ON 31-03-2016. THE AO MADE DISALLOWANCE U/S 36(1)(III) OF RS.1.05 CRORES, DISA LLOWANCE U/S 14A OF RS.61.52 LAKHS, DISALLOWANCE U/S 36(1)(VA) OF RS.89 ,544 AND ADDIT6ION U/S 68 OF RS.3.77 CRORES. AGGRIEVED BY VARIOUS ADDITIONS / DISALLOWANCES IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER, ASSESSEE FILED APPEAL BEFORE CIT( A) ON 28-04-2016. THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE WAS NOT ADMITTED BY LD.CIT(A) ON THE GROUND THAT AS PER RULE 45A OF INCOME-TAX RULES, 1962, IT WAS MANDATO RILY REQUIRED TO FILE APPEAL ELECTRONICALLY W.E.F. 01-03-2016. FURTHER A GGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF LD.CIT(A), THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEA L BEFORE US. 3. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, WHEN TH E MATTER WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING. PERUSAL OF RECORD REVEALS THAT ASS ESSEE WAS SERVED WITH THE 3 ITA 3830/MUM/2018 NOTICE OF HEARING OF APPEAL ON 03-07-2019. THEREFO RE, WE ARE LEFT WITH NO OPTION EXCEPT TO HEAR THE LD.DR FOR THE REVENUE AND DECIDE THE APPEAL ON THE BASIS OF MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. 4. THE LD.DR SUPPORTED THE ORDER OF CIT(A) AND SUBM ITTED THAT ASSESSEE WAS REQUIRED TO FILE APPEAL IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT AS PER RULE 45 OF I.T. RULES. THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO FILE APPEAL ELECTRONICALLY, THEREFORE, THE LD.CIT(A) DISMISSED THE APPEAL. 5. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE SUBMISSION AND PERUSED TH E ORDER OF LD.CIT(A). WE HAVE NOTED THAT THE ASSESSMENT ORDER WAS PASSED ON 31-03- 2016. THE ASSESSEE FILED APPEAL BEFORE LD.CIT(A) O N 28-04-2016 MANUALLY. THE LD.CIT(A) ISSUED SHOW CAUSE NOTICE TO THE ASSES SEE FOR NOT FILING APPEAL ELECTRONICALLY. THE LD.CIT(A) RECORDED THAT THE AS SESSEE WAS GIVEN OPPORTUNITY AND TO SUBMIT REPLY ON 28-03-2018. NO REPLY WAS RECEIVED. THE LD.CIT(A) DISMISSED THE APPEAL BY TREATING IT AS NO N EST. WE HAVE NOTED THAT IN THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE HAS SPECIFIC ALLY STATED THAT NOTICE ISSUED ON 22-03-2018 WAS NOT RECEIVED BY THEM AND, THEREFORE, THEY COULD NOT COMPLY WITH THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE LD.CIT(A). CONSIDERING THE FACT THAT RULE 45 OF I.T. RULES WAS AMENDED W.E.F. 01-03- 2016. MOREOVER, THERE IS NO MANDATE OR CORRESPONDI NG AMENDMENT IN SECTION 249 / 250 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961. MOREOVER, T HE RULE IS MADE TO 4 ITA 3830/MUM/2018 FACILITATE THE ASSESSEE AND NOT TO CONDEMN THE PART Y FROM GRANTING OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE FACT THAT ASSESSEE HAS FILED APPEAL WELL WITHIN TIME THOUGH MANUALLY, WE RESTORE THE APPEAL TO THE FILE OF THE LD.CIT(A) TO DECIDE THE APPEAL ON MERIT. THE A SSESSEE IS DIRECTED TO FILE APPEAL ELECTRONICALLY. THE LD.CIT(A) IS FURTHER DI RECTED TO CONSIDER THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE ON MERIT AND DECIDE THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS TREATED AS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 30-08-2019. SD/- SD/- (R.C. SHARMA) (PAWAN SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIALMEMBER MUMBAI, DT : 30 TH AUGUST, 2019 PK/- COPY TO : 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR /TRUE COPY/ BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI