G. Shivender Reddy, Hyderabad, Hyderabad V. ITO, Ward-4(4), Hyderabad, Hyderabad

ITA 387/HYD/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 111 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3932 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-02-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB-B
• Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2020
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 03-03-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A C ROUTDR
• Assessee Lawyers: N O N E

Judgement Text

ITA NO 387 OF 2017G SHIVENDER REDDY HYDERABAD. PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD B SMC BENCH, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.387/HYD/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2008-09 SHRI SHIVENDER REDDY GUTHA, HYDERABAD PAN:ACWPG4534F VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2) HYDERABAD (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: N O N E REVENUE BY : SRI A.C. ROUT,DR DATE OF HEARING: 25/02/2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 28/02/2020 ORDER THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR THE A.Y 2008-09 AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A)-5, HYDERABAD, DATED 30.11. 2016. 2. THIS APPEAL CAME UP FOR HEARING FOR THE FIRST TI ME ON 22.06.2017 AND THE ASSESSEE WAS REPRESENTED BY HIS COUNSEL SHRI A.V. RAGHURAM. THEREAFTER, THE MATTER CAME UP FOR H EARING ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS AND THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED AT T HE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUNSEL FROM TIME TO TIME TILL 26.07 .2018. ON 6.2.2019, THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, SHR I A.V.RAGHURAM FILED A LETTER WITHDRAWING HIS VAKALAT NAMA AND THE REGISTRY HAS ISSUED NOTICE TO THE ASSESSEE THROUGH RPAD ALONG WITH LETTER OF THE AR. NONE APPEARED FOR THE ASSES SEE ON 19.11.2019 AND THEREFORE, ANOTHER NOTICE WAS ISSUED BY RPAD. ON 8.1.2020, THE ASSESSEE WAS PRESENT BY HIMSELF AN D REQUESTED TIME TO ENGAGE A COUNSEL AND THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 25.02.2020 I.E TODAY. HOWEVER, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR HIS ITA NO 387 OF 2017G SHIVENDER REDDY HYDERABAD. PAGE 2 OF 2 REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL TODAY W HEN THE MATTER CAME UP FOR HEARING. THEREFORE, IT IS PRESUM ED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE HIS APPEAL. FU RTHER, THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO NOT FILED ANY WRITTEN SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF HIS CASE. THEREFORE, I SEE NO REASON TO INTERFERE W ITH THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A) ON MERIT ALSO. 3. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28 TH FEBRUARY, 2020. SD/- HYDERABAD, DATED 28 TH FEBRUARY, 2020. VINODAN/SPS COPY TO: 1 SRI SHIVENDER REDDY GUTHA, H.NO.8-2-293/82/A171, PLOT NO.171 ROAD NO.13, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD 500033 2 ITO WARD 4(4) (NOW ASSESSED WITH ITO WARD 14(1) I T TOWERS, AC GUARDS, HYDERABAD 500004 3 CIT (A)-5 HYDERABAD 4 PR. CIT 1 HYDERABAD 5 THE DR, ITAT HYDERABAD 6 GUARD FILE BY ORDER (P. MADHAVI DEVI) JUDICIAL MEMBER