, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH: KOL KATA () BEFORE , /AND , ! . '# . ) [BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM & SHRI C. D. RAO, AM] $ $ $ $ / I.T.A NO. 04/KOL/2011 %& '( %& '( %& '( %& '(/ // / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 SMT. SARITA AGARWAL VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, (PAN ADAPA 9660 K) CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA (*+ /APPELLANT ) (,-*+/ RESPONDENT ) FOR THE APPELLANT: SHRI SUBASH AGARWAL FOR THE RESPONDENT: SHRI S. K. ROY DATE OF HEARING: 22.09.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 22.09.2011 . / ORDER PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM ( , , , , ) THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS ARISING OUT OF REVISION ORDER OF CIT, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA PASSED U/S. 263 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961(HEREINA FTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) IN NO.CIT(C) -1/263/TECH/KOL/2009-10/9039-401 DATED 22/29.08.201 0. ASSESSMENT WAS FRAMED BY ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-XI, KOLKATA U/S. 143(3) R.W.S. 153B/ 153D OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 VIDE HIS ORDER DATED 28.12. 2007. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING BEFORE US, LD. COUNSEL F OR THE ASSESSEE PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. HE STATED THAT HE HAS INSTRUCTIONS FROM ASS ESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. LD. DR HAS NOT OBJECTED TO THIS PRAYER OF ASSESSEE. HENCE, WE PERMIT WITHDRAWAL AND DISMISS ASSESSEES APPEAL. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- . '# '#'# '# . ! , (C. D. RAO) (MAHAVIR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER ( #! #! #! #!) )) ) DATED : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2011 /0 %12 3 JD.(SR.P.S.) 2 ITA 04/K/2011 SMT. SARITA AGARWAL A.Y. 06-07 . 4 , 5 '6- COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1 . *+ / APPELLANT SMT. SARITA AGARWAL, 36/1, DEODAR STREE T, KOLKATA- 700 019 2 ,-*+ / RESPONDENT, CIT, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA. 3 . .% ( )/ THE CIT(A), KOLKATA 4. .% / CIT, KOLKATA 5 . => ,% / DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA - ,/ TRUE COPY, .%?/ BY ORDER, 2 /ASSTT. REGISTRAR .