IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JODHPUR BENCH , JODHPUR (VIRTUAL COURT AT CHANDIGARH) BEFORE: SHRI. N.K.SAINI, VP & SHRI, R.L. NEGI, JM ITA NO. 403/JODH/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2015-16 SHUBHAM SONI, C/O- DIAMOND JEWELLERS, SURATGARH (RAJ) THE ITO, WARD-SURATGARH. PAN NO. FKVPS2812A APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA NO. 404/JODH/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2015-16 RAJAT SONI, C/O- DIAMOND JEWELLERS, SURATGARH (RAJ) THE ITO, WARD-SURATGARH. PAN NO. FTNPS4095C APPELLANT RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY : SHRI VIRENDRA JAIN, ADVOCATE REVENUE BY : MISS. KAJAL SINGH, JCIT-DR ! '# DATE OF HEARING : 27/04/2021 $%&'()# DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 27/04/2021 / ORDER PER BENCH: BOTH THESE APPEALS BY THE DIFFERENT ASSESSEES ARE D IRECTED AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF LD. CIT(A), BIKANER BOTH DATED 2 5/10/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2015-16. 2. IN BOTH THE ABOVE APPEALS THE ASSESSEES FURNISHE D SEPARATE APPLICATIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS. 2 ITA 403/JODH/2019 & ONE ANR SHUBHAM SONI VS ITO 3. LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEES SUBMITTED BEFORE US THAT ASSESSEES ARE WILLING TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHE ME-2020 AND NECESSARY FORMS ALONGWITH APPLICATIONS IN THIS REGARD HAD BEEN FILE D. 4. THE LD. DR DID NOT OBJECT IF THE ABOVE SAID APPE ALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE PRESENT CASES, SINCE THE ASSESSEES HAD EX PRESSED THEIR INTENTIONS OF NOT PURSUING THE APPEALS AND OPTING FOR SETTLING THE DI SPUTE IN THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 FRAMED BY THE LEGISLATURE IN THIS REGAR D. THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED, WITH THE LIBERTY GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEES TO GET TH E APPEALS RESTORED IN CASE THEY ARE UNABLE TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE UNDER VIVAD SE VI SHWAS SCHEME-2020. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEES ARE DISM ISSED AS WITHDRAWN. (ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 27/04/2021) SD/- SD/- (R.L. NEGI) (N.K. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT DATED : 27/04/2021 *RANJAN % +,-. -( / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. THE CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, JODHPUR 6. GUARD FILE